Micro:
Thanks for your response.
Playing devil's advocate here, I am not sure I understand how you can say that no measurements or technical data can correlate to sound quality. I am NOT
saying they do, but how would you know unless you had a sampling of scores of cables with their measurements and listening tests?
I don't think L,C,R are irrelevant, and I have never heard anyone say that before, they are an important part of the equation, but of course, only one part of the story.
Here is an example of technical claims without any data I am aware of:
"Imagine an interconnect cable that has 2.5pf, in an industry where our competitors boast about their double digit pico-farads (pf) Never has the industry seen anything like this before! The legendary Zero Gold was known for its extremely low capacitance and ultra wide bandwidth. The new Zero Evolution has an increase of 75% bandwidth over the Zero Gold, and a 300% increase over any other high-end audio cable in the world today. The Grandmaster Series has the largest bandwidth ever! Ever!"
Largest bandwidth ever? How can they make these claims if they have not tested their cable against every other cable on the market?
Do you see what I am getting at?
Andre,
When I say there is no measurement that can correlate the sound characteristics of high-end cables with their technical data I am surely referring to facts that are of public knowledge, not of some imaginary or non documented research kept hidden from the reviewers and consumers.
I understand your point and what you dislike. But try to write a marketing leaflet for an high-end cable, or if you do not want to do it, please nominate a single manufacturer of top sounding high-end cables that produces what you consider as being exemplary technical literature.
BTW, I also still have some top Kimber cables - KS3038 and KS1136. I would love to know, in pure technical terms, why they sound so different from their copper equivalents.