The best 5 speakers that you have had

emoonie

VIP/Donor
Aug 16, 2021
39
53
150
64
Monterey CA
Thanks Ron. Have also been fascinated with your thread as the culmination continues:)
 

Gregadd

WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
10,579
1,794
1,850
Metro DC
I am like the guy who kept marrying and divorcing the same woman.
.1 Martin Llogan CLS1
2. Martin Logan CLS 1
3. Martin Logan CLS1
4. Magnepan MG1
5. Martin Logan Aerius (Yes I married her little sister)
6. Vandersteen 2ce
 

Argonaut

Well-Known Member
Jul 30, 2013
2,425
1,655
530
N/A
I am like the guy who kept marrying and divorcing the same woman.
.1 Martin Llogan CLS1
2. Martin Logan CLS 1
3. Martin Logan CLS1
4. Magnepan MG1
5. Martin Logan Aerius (Yes I married her little sister)
6. Vandersteen 2ce
Have you considered CLX’s ?
 

Gregadd

WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
10,579
1,794
1,850
Metro DC
I no longer have the space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fishfood

Vinylleroy

Member
Jul 8, 2022
16
7
8
31
Martin Logan CLS 1 with 2 Vandersteen subs, driven by Primare 928 monos.
Martin Logan Statement E2 driven by 2 Krell FPB 600 C
MBL 101 E with Martin Logan Statement E2 sub-woofer towers, driven by MBL 9011 amps.
Back to full set of Martin Logan Statement E2 driven by MBL 9011 amps.
Honorable mention to my most used speakers, a pair of very smooth and forgiving Sonus Faber Cremona Auditors with Vandersteen subs, driven by Primare 928 monos, playing TV sound trough a OPPO. All speakers are still around ! :rolleyes:
Hi Lagonda,

I'm in a bit of a split off what to do. And you might be capable of giving me the right advise when I look at your speakers. ;-)

Currently i'm running a set of Elipson 1303 FT speakers with my Unison Research S6MKII tube amp. Looks like a bit of a weird combination when you look at the sensitivity of the speakers, but it sounds great. I'm running these for +/- 7 years now and I'm starting to look at different speakers, as the Elipson's are from the '80s. I learned that I'm not all for the 'new high-end sound' with lightning fast details, but more of a musical sound lover. Whatever that means.... but you might get what I mean. ;-)

So, at the moment I can buy a set of SF Cremona's (not the M) speakers, but I'm also waiting for the keys of our new home. I think i'll move in may. Ideally I would wait for me to move to my new home so I could try-out the cremona's there, but at the same time I think the Cremona's will be gone/sold in may and I won't be able to buy them anymore.

You can't fix this challenge for me but I'm curious to know how good you think the Cremona's are, eventhough you are using the Auditors. Could you tell me more about them?

Thank you in advance.

Leroy
 

Lagonda

VIP/Donor
Feb 3, 2014
3,515
4,827
1,255
Denmark
Hi Lagonda,

I'm in a bit of a split off what to do. And you might be capable of giving me the right advise when I look at your speakers. ;-)

Currently i'm running a set of Elipson 1303 FT speakers with my Unison Research S6MKII tube amp. Looks like a bit of a weird combination when you look at the sensitivity of the speakers, but it sounds great. I'm running these for +/- 7 years now and I'm starting to look at different speakers, as the Elipson's are from the '80s. I learned that I'm not all for the 'new high-end sound' with lightning fast details, but more of a musical sound lover. Whatever that means.... but you might get what I mean. ;-)

So, at the moment I can buy a set of SF Cremona's (not the M) speakers, but I'm also waiting for the keys of our new home. I think i'll move in may. Ideally I would wait for me to move to my new home so I could try-out the cremona's there, but at the same time I think the Cremona's will be gone/sold in may and I won't be able to buy them anymore.

You can't fix this challenge for me but I'm curious to know how good you think the Cremona's are, eventhough you are using the Auditors. Could you tell me more about them?

Thank you in advance.

Leroy
The Cremonas are forgiving in the treble, nice on voices, you can play badly recorded pop and rock without hurting your ears. I like them a lot, i play my Auditors with subwoofers. I bought a pair of Cremona M floorstanders for my mother, they have a decent bass output in a fairly large room, and are just beautiful to look at, a little more sparkling in the treble, but still pleasant. Both have fantastic tone on violin pieces ! :) I can not tell you how your tube amplifier will handle the Cremonas, i have used good 80- 150 Watt solid state amplifiers on mine.
 
Last edited:

Vinylleroy

Member
Jul 8, 2022
16
7
8
31
The Cremonas are forgiving in the treble, nice on voices, you can play badly recorded pop and rock without hurting your ears. I like them a lot, i play my Auditors with subwoofers. I bought a pair of Cremona M floorstanders for my mother, they have a decent bass output in a fairly large room, and are just beautiful to look at, a little more sparkling in the treble, but still pleasant. Both have fantastic tone on violin pieces ! :)
Thank you for your reply.
You never felt the urge to get the Cremona instead of the Auditors? I read that the Cremona is more of the 'old SF sound' and that the M has more push in the mid-high and high field.
 

Lagonda

VIP/Donor
Feb 3, 2014
3,515
4,827
1,255
Denmark
Thank you for your reply.
You never felt the urge to get the Cremona instead of the Auditors? I read that the Cremona is more of the 'old SF sound' and that the M has more push in the mid-high and high field.
I have the early Cremona Auditors stand speakers, and use them as part of my TV room setup, the subs are integrated into my equipment "rack" , full range Cremona are to big in that position for me. I think the M designation is for the later model with a different tweeter and crossover, they come in a full range and stand model too, they look almost identical. 3741C2C5-727C-4381-AC61-42820E25149A.jpeg A5D9E0AB-3791-4EFC-A9DB-14FF67CE7731.jpeg 0CE8BB11-33DE-4DE8-8DAF-963E461026C5.jpeg
 
Last edited:

thomask

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2018
1,623
1,539
275
64
Washington State, US
I have the early Cremona Auditors stand speakers, and use them as part of my TV room setup, the subs are integrated into my equipment "rack" , full range Cremona are to big in that position for me. I think the M designation is for the later model with a different tweeter and crossover, they come in a full range and stand model too, they look almost identical. View attachment 105419 View attachment 105420 View attachment 105421
I look forward to listening to MBL 101 after 15 years hiatus tomorrow at Seoul Audio Show.

Cremona sounds musical to my memory.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lagonda

Lagonda

VIP/Donor
Feb 3, 2014
3,515
4,827
1,255
Denmark
I look forward to listen to MBL 101 after 15 years hiatus tomorrow at Seoul Audio Show.

Cremona sounds musical to my memory.
I love the sound of my MBL 101's, i feel a little guilty not using them at the moment, but i need the big room for the Statements now. I will maybe set them up in a 40"x17" room i have above my garage, but not having double sets of quality amplifiers is a limiting factor at this moment. :( If my listening room had a more symmetrical layout in both ends, i would have set them up in each end, with amplifiers in the middle !:rolleyes:
 

jonathanhorwich

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2010
68
47
923
Chicago
1. Levinson HQD system (despite faults magical midrange and highs)
2. Dunlavy SC IVa (brilliantly coherent speaker only missing the transparency of modern speakers)
3. TAD Reference One's (amazing speaker)
4. Quad 57s (by Electrostatic Solutions and still own them as midrange reference)
5. Horning Eufrodites (my studio reference as highly detailed, fast, efficient and tonally neutral)
 

thomask

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2018
1,623
1,539
275
64
Washington State, US
1. Levinson HQD system (despite faults magical midrange and highs)
2. Dunlavy SC IVa (brilliantly coherent speaker only missing the transparency of modern speakers)
3. TAD Reference One's (amazing speaker)
4. Quad 57s (by Electrostatic Solutions and still own them as midrange reference)
5. Horning Eufrodites (my studio reference as highly detailed, fast, efficient and tonally neutral)
I had listened to other speakers than Levinson HQD.

Could you give more detailed idea how Levinson sounds.
 

jonathanhorwich

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2010
68
47
923
Chicago
The HQD I had used 6 mono ML-2 Levinson Class A amps on lows, mids, and highs. The general sound of the mids (two Quad 57s on each channel) and highs (Decca tweeters) was magical. But the bass was Harley subwoofers which were huge, slow, and somewhat muddy. With great subs as we have today it would have made a huge difference. The system did not image as well as the best and of course did not have huge dynamics. But tonally it killed. And had a big sound unlike a single pair of Quad 57s. All in all, magical, despite limitations as above.
 

213Cobra

Well-Known Member
Aug 27, 2018
328
344
148
69
Los Angeles, CA
1/ Zu Definition 6
2/ Zu Druid 6
3/ Zu Definition 4
4/ BBC LS3/5A "doubled" ala the Absolute Sound Double Advent System from 1975
5/ Tie between Quad ESL "57" and KLH Nine

Honorable Mention: ProAc EBS

Phil
 
  • Like
Reactions: thomask

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing