That’s very kind of you, we all do what we can, but there are certainly many more costly and better setups and especially more perfect rooms than mine (including yours), which is all contributing its part. What I can say is, that frequent flipping of components stopped long ago in my case by hearing (after a certain level was reached), how little of the finally essential things this “slightly different or better” contributed in comparison to those other measures.
I fully understand, that huge previous investments are not easy to drop. If you stay with the existing cabling, with the other measures you still can get rid of the grid and room related HF noise and with component guards, you can clean the gear. With the Allocator you have at least one part of the power network, delivering the high resolution and you block HF noise exchanging over power cabling.
Regarding the Sch. cabling, as far as I understood the overall context...in terms of HF noise, you'd close the gap where with different cabling you'd still continue to constantly collect the HF noise over the cabling and try to cancel it out as good as possible by the following measures (in this case: component guards). The resolution, speed, bass control and coherence of the cabling within the frequency range, resulting from the rest of their design, is another chapter.
But any of those high class setups you all have, for sure have an own synergy as they are and it’s always good to know when to stop. The question is: should you some time try the cabling if you’re not willing to buy them in case they do what they promise? We all answered this for ourselves a few times already in the one or other way I guess ;-)
I really appreciate the openness and how the different experiences of folks here can be followed.
