A thread within a thread! Who'd have thunk it? Let's do cable elevators next!
If you want to close your eyes and get good performance, then better use balanced interconnects. The moment you use this antiquated scheme known as unbalanced, then you better learn a whole host of parameters before even dreaming about matching CD's performance let alone high-res music.
No problem Steve.....I guess my attempt at a bit of humour didn't pass muster. Sorry about that.not sure I agree John. I was merely answering a question about going with balanced cables . Do you have a problem with that?
Physics and electronics of audio are without emotion. If they damn your system performance, they damn your system performance. You can't curse your way out of that by insulting me Tom. Hogwash claim? How about sharing some data as I did to demonstrate that?That has got to be the biggest claim of hogwash I have ever heard of. I would venture to say that you have just insulted more than half of our membership that uses unbalanced. The way you stated that was fact, when in fact it is situation, system and gear dependant.
Tom
First, noise is not binary. It has spectrum and amplitude. Second, who says it is clear to untrained listener? I have lost count of how many times my wife or son come up to me and ask, "what is that noise?" I ask, "what noise?" They say, "can't you hear it?" My answer sadly is "no." And then find out that they were exactly right. There was noise but these old ears could not hear it.Also, one shouldn't need to provide measurements on noise. There either is noise or there isn't. That should be rather clear, even to the untrained listener.
Physics and electronics of audio are without emotion. If they damn your system performance, they damn your system performance. You can't curse your way out of that by insulting me Tom. Hogwash claim? How about sharing some data as I did to demonstrate that?
If you read the post you see that if you are using short cables with heavy, low resistance shield, the problem would be minimized. Since many systems are in this sort, those folks should not feel slighted.
First, noise is not binary. It has spectrum and amplitude. Second, who says it is clear to untrained listener? I have lost count of how many times my wife or son come up to me and ask, "what is that noise?" I ask, "what noise?" They say, "can't you hear it?" My answer sadly is "no." And then find out that they were exactly right. There was no noise and these old ears could not hear it.
Second, even the best and quietest rooms have noise. Here is an article I wrote on that: http://www.madronadigital.com/Library/RoomDynamicRange.html
Sample data from listening rooms of different people:
Solid line shows threshold of hearing for a young person without hearing loss. In other words, present company excluded . Notice that the average system has noise floor well above listening threshold. Only the best room measured was below this.
Even the best recording spaces struggle to keep noise inaudible:
The above measurements were made with all HVAC turned off.
You have data like this, please come back. Otherwise personal outrage is not appreciated.
I'm not debating nor am I changing parameters. I am merely stating what Lamm does. He does not use balanced cables. There is no noise in my system and life is good. I really don't care about the measurements as my room is silent
Good morning Mike (British Colombia),
Balanced connections are used by all musicians recordists artists singers opera lovers classical performers orchestral diapasons of the world.
@ home the same exact people live; in large mansions with multiple rooms for different activities and of grandiose aspirations.
Our dreams are becoming reality more each day that goes buy...because we make it happen...we aim and we shoot @ the target...with the arrow travelling all the distance necessary @ the required speed, unaffected by wind turbulence, and with tangential accuracy.
What connection's type are you using yourself @ home, and two do you think it matters for most users...professional and amateur hi-res music lovers from all classes of our society starting @ lo-end to mid-end passing by hi-end and ultimately reaching ultra hi-end...supreme apotheosis of the state-of-the-affair.
Brief, what sounds best from the bottom to the top. It depends? Would you rather be blindfolded and hear the music or be deaf and watch the movie?
Simply put; when we hear the cries of our firstborn, and that we look in his/her eyes...what strongest connection do we get from one another?
Are you using unbalanced connections @ home? What is your measured evaluation from your estimate opinion? :b
Hey Tom, this thread could well represent the state of high end audio!
I can imagine the transparency of the system would have some bearing in this matter. If everything is clouded over with tube distortions anyways, it's probably very difficult to detect a difference.
That's one heck of an (erroneous) assumption. Noise and THD are two very different things. One you can hear when the music is playing (maybe) the other exists when no music is playing at all.
Generally, the room is going to much noisier than the equipment anyways.
Physics and electronics of audio are without emotion. If they damn your system performance, they damn your system performance. You can't curse your way out of that by insulting me Tom. Hogwash claim? How about sharing some data as I did to demonstrate that?
If you read the post you see that if you are using short cables with heavy, low resistance shield, the problem would be minimized. Since many systems are in this sort, those folks should not feel slighted.
First, noise is not binary. It has spectrum and amplitude. Second, who says it is clear to untrained listener? I have lost count of how many times my wife or son come up to me and ask, "what is that noise?" I ask, "what noise?" They say, "can't you hear it?" My answer sadly is "no." And then find out that they were exactly right. There was noise but these old ears could not hear it.
Second, even the best and quietest rooms have noise. Here is an article I wrote on that: http://www.madronadigital.com/Library/RoomDynamicRange.html
Sample data from listening rooms of different people:
Solid line shows threshold of hearing for a young person without hearing loss. In other words, present company excluded . Notice that the average system has noise floor well above listening threshold. Only the best room measured was below this.
Even the best recording spaces struggle to keep noise inaudible:
The above measurements were made with all HVAC turned off.
You have data like this, please come back. Otherwise personal outrage is not appreciated.