Geardaddy, I contend you'll find if you open up a Troy or an Entreq, you'll find more similarities than differences. Plates/wiring of Silver and Copper interspersed/packed w/minerals/chemicals. I have no way to prove this, both companies are never going to agree to opening their boxes. But it's a valid assumption. There may be differences in composition, but the bulk will be similar. Tbh, they are both trying to mimic the ground post buried dozens of feet down into the earth to the water table if we could all ground our systems out into the garden.
Troy has marketed itself as chassis-, Entreq as signal-grounding. Now it seems both companies are claiming they do both.
So in more ways than they are not, I believe they are interchangeable/equivalent tech, but of course one will be more attractive sounding than another in any particular system.
Surely you're not arguing that they are different like analog v digital, SS v tubes?
Troy has marketed itself as chassis-, Entreq as signal-grounding. Now it seems both companies are claiming they do both.
So in more ways than they are not, I believe they are interchangeable/equivalent tech, but of course one will be more attractive sounding than another in any particular system.
Surely you're not arguing that they are different like analog v digital, SS v tubes?