The obvious alternatives are to buy two Emperors, try different component combinations to seek the best, or just ignore the issue.
Because my Tidal Sunrays are gone I am able to insert two Tripoint signatures in my Kondo/Genesis set up. My experiences so far are that individual components benefit most if they are connected to just one binding post (sorry Lloyd). This was one of the reasons I ordered the Tripoint emperor with eight binding posts. According to Miquel the emperor beats even a combination of more than two Troy signatures.
Hi , in your twin Troy Sig set up how many Thor SE Grounding cables are you employing . Is the first upgrade to the bigger grounding cable the best bang for buck , or is the effect cumulative on adding further Thor ground cables ? Look forward with interest to hearing your impressions on the E !
Jazzhead, the Thor PC option, I think, must be decided when you order and is quite expensive. At Miguel's strong recommendation, I bought the bullet. The Troy SEs are an incredible improvement and I have two more on order.
In my early review of the original Troy, I tried many other cheaper grounding cables but none were in the league of the Tripoint Silvers. Now their Troy SEs make the Silver sound second rate.
All of this causes me to say I am merely validating all that Miguel has said.
I should further note that I am flying down to listen to the Emperor sometime around the end of the year and once Miguel can assure me that he has a Troy Signature to which I can compare the Emperor.
Geardaddy, I'll pick up your toys and put them calmly back in your pram. I have no desire to get on to the AE guys, arguing on this forum is enough for me, thanks. Maybe you can tell me what comments you object to. I never said Troy isn't different from Entreq, I said my contention is they have similarities, both approximating to an uber version of the ground post in 20' of soil model. I wouldn't be surprised if Troy has more expensive materials/unobtanium inside it, but it seems logical that they are designed along similar principles. How is this an attack on Troy?
And, btw, if you don't get it already, Tripoint and Entreq are BOTH benefitting from these combative comments. It's all publicity - there's no such thing as bad publicity.
Now, I'm going to take a nap in the chicken coop. Ciao...
Guys, I think we should be looking for common ground rather than debate which system is better or the best. I use the Tripoint Signature myself and I am very happy with it. I have never heard the Entreq which doesn't mean this system is flawed in any way nor necessarily inferior to Tripoint. Remember, hifi systems are complex so what's not to say that Entreq may work better in one system and the Tripoint in another? It reminds me of people trying to argue whether a Ferrari is better or a Porsche. This argument is truly endless and rather pointless as each generation of new product outdoes the previous generation of the other... and you gotta compare straight line performance or lap time around the track or in the wet vs dry Silverstone vs Monaco etc...Musical and system performance is even harder to measure objectively. The key however is in recognizing that perhaps there is real merit in what both Entreq and Tripoint are doing for high end audio. I personally applaud both brands without reservations nor judgement.
Hi Spiritofmusic,
Total agree with you! I am taking a system wide approach - I have earthing sorted out for now with my Tripoint signature. Next, I plan to evaluate various Troy and Dalby Earthing cables to see if these truly do make a significant difference in my system and worth the money. I also plan to try some VertexAQ products to see if their Grounding components will work well in conjunction with my Tripoint system with additional benefits. I also have a VertexAQ Hirez Taga on order as well which will get passive filtration via my Lessloss Firewall- Hope to have this in place by Christmas.
Finally, I would like to compare Stillpoints isolation philosophy vs VertexAQs Leading Edge Platform which drains vibrations/noise into the platform labyrinth as opposed to isolating.
Honestly, I don't really care what I use. If it improves my system substantially, I am game. Lets hope we have succeeded in taking the first steps towards world peace!!!
Verbiage from a 2012 review. Now that better measurement tools are out there, we can start to demonstrate an actual effect of all our voodoo tweaks. For the record, I also use the Kemp Electroniks products. I am an unabashed tweaker. It is ironically the true cutting edge in audio although it has its dangers....
"There would be more. As we still had the Blue Horizon Noise Analyser on hand, we could not resists to conduct an actual measurement. This analyzer makes that pretty easy. Just plug its captive power cord into any wall outlet, listen to the noise emitted through the little speaker and read the display. In our case the latter showed a fat 600 out of an abysmal 999 to point at a pretty noisy mains. As reported in our review of the Noise Analyser <http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/bluehorizon/1.html>, for some inexplicable reason we also have a radio station freeloading on our mains spur which is perfectly audible over the Analyser’s speaker. If the Linebacker really worked as advertised, we should be able to get a lower reading. With our homebrew adapter cable we connected the Analyser to the Linebacker’s female Oyaide. And guess what? The reading dropped to a respectable 160, meaning a lot of HF noise had gotten filtered out for the remaining noise to measure safely within the ‘okay’ green zone. This substantiated a good deal of the Linebacker’s audible improvement. What remained was the radio reception. Was this then already the conclusion?"
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/prana/2.html
DRC, the joy/madness continues for those after uber grounding solutions. May I ask how much the Dalby Pearl, Celestial and Reuben Reference ground cables cost? I mean the base level Dalby ground cable is £5k/$8k. Do you feel these will be a step beyond Troy's own top Thor cables?
I'm waiting for the time when, prob on AE, a rich and brave soul kits out his system w/TWO Emperors (so individual components don't share ground posts), TWO Emperor AC conditioners to power up to a dozen components w/no compromise, and a slew of 10-20 Troy Thor or top Dalby earth cables.
I don't doubt the effects will be staggering, and the price of this uber grounding rig will prob equate to the cost of the core components themselves combined. I wonder when the law of diminishing returns applies to grounding?
I certainly can't bleat about this, my cables/power/grounding/isolation bill equates to the same cash I've spent on my core component rig of tt/cdp/amps/spkrs.
I disagree. There should be active trash talking. I am going to ask the Universe (or myself) to send me an Emporer with a full loom of Thor SE grounding cables....
I like your approach. I know everyone on the AE forums is ranting about the Pranawire Linebacker stuff. Have you heard it? I use a device that has some similarities (Mosaic Audio Suspension bridge) and have been pleased with the results. The Vertex platforms look like an amagamum of approaches. I use mechanical grounding of my equipment (ala Starsound Sistrum racks) and have a dedicated room with grounded walls, etc. The Troy will my final addition. In talking with both Miguel and Robert at Starsound, they suggested grounding the actual racks rather than the equipment chassis to provide an enhanced sink or grounding plane. Anyone else trying this?
Hi there.
Would be interested to know which Kemp products you use and how well they have worked.