Yes, I have seen and read the marketing copy Shunyata has produced for this to celebrate this great "discovery". It is one single anecdote generated by one single electro cardiologist, who also happens to be an audiophile. But, as has been observed elsewhere, one audiophile, in this case one cardiologist, heard/saw a difference with his lab equipment. Therefore, all the textbooks on physics, electronics, electrical codes, etc. need to be rewritten to recognize this great new "discovery" and addition to the basic knowledge base for all mankind.
Fortunately, science does not work that way. When this one doctor submits this for peer review and it is replicated and survives, maybe it will have some useful impact. Has this momentous "finding" been published in any reputable professional journal? If not, that speaks volumes. I will just wait for all that dust to settle, thank you, without insisting that my current electro cardiologist get on board with it. In the mean time, you will excuse me if I relegate this to the category of the sustainable nuclear fusion reaction allegedly produced by two PhDs in the lab several decades ago. That, though highly publicized, was revealed as a total fraud and scandal. Many other claimed, but isolated, hypotheses in many fields have similarly not passed muster. Is this any different? Time will tell.
But, in this case "science" from this one anecdote is the audiophile's friend. Here we have the imprimatur of one doctor, and we know they are all infallible, to attest that Shunyata works wonders on his lab equipment, as well as his stereo. So, obviously we need no controlled, unbiased tests of actual audibility to conclude that we all need this in our audio systems right away!