I looked for this ^ on PrimePhonic but could not find it.
I knew little of Klaus Tennstedt other than he was highly regarded, and had a residency with the LPO in the 80s.
I did a little reading up on him - one of the things about streaming services is they often give you a 'potted' history of conductor, performer, orchestra, etc.
Tennstedt had an interesting life, with much adversity, ill health and frailty. He didn't get an easy trot.
In any event I did manage to track this down, a 1976 recording with Symphonie Orchester des Bayerischen Rundfunks, which interested me.
Released in 1985 by Profil.
In Primephonic there is something of a scathing review reproduced (but not adopted) from TiVo, which frankly I thought abit tough. Anyway the final paragraph reads as follows:
Like the 1982 Eighth, Tennstedt's 1976 recording of Bruckner's Third with the Symphonie Orchester des Bayerischen Rundfunks is intensely charismatic, a wonderful quality in Mahler, whose music is about yearning and striving, but it has nothing to do with Bruckner, whose music is about being and becoming. With his brave Bavarians beside him, Tennstedt leads a mounted assault on Bruckner's Third, sweeping through themes and over developments to take the final climax with sheer sonic power. But it's entirely beside the point. For all the charismatic intensity of Tennstedt's interpretation, Bruckner's Third is not about getting from here to there, but about being here, there, and everywhere -- and the more Tennstedt strives, the less he succeeds. Profil's radio broadcast sound is a bit rough, but very evocative.”
Ok - I'll give him that the sound quality wasn't the absolute best - but then again - its 1976 and a 1985 CD.
As for the performance - I thought charismatic was a decent enough good descriptor - I liked it - it was full of passion and feeling. It was a very powerful 3rd to be sure - needed a much better system than mine to really experience that.
I'll give the reviewer that it wasn't perhaps the most subtle thing in the world, but I enjoyed it.
Edit: PS - WTF this actually means I have no idea: "
Mahler, whose music is about yearning and striving, but it has nothing to do with Bruckner, whose music is about being and becoming."
This sort of reviewing I find particularly annoying
. What exactly
being and becoming is, that
yearning and striving isn't? (even if I accepted the proposition it was an accurate characterization of Mahler, which I don't - Mahler wrote an awful lot of music, and had at least 3 distinct periods to his composition, which are to my ears at least quite distinct).
Anyways - rant over...