Zero Distortion: Altec Assault and the Magic of Misho (Audio Antiquary)

Maril555

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2014
388
346
370

Folsom

VIP/Donor
Oct 25, 2015
6,031
1,504
550
Eastern WA
Where did you get 9.5 from?

That’s the min length for 30hz to be affectively effected by a horn. Below that it’s not a horn, 30hz goes back into omnidirectional. You get it by dividing the sound wavelength by 4.

However a lot of horns are longer than 1/4 of the wavelength which can make them more directional, higher sensitivity.
 

Folsom

VIP/Donor
Oct 25, 2015
6,031
1,504
550
Eastern WA
Also horn loading for 80hz FLH starts at 3.5ft, so midbass is perfectly possible with a bit box, like some I suspect Ked has posted.
 

Solypsa

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2017
1,811
1,401
275
Seattle
www.solypsa.com
I suspect most of the 'normal' sized 'mid bass' flh transition from controlled directivity to omni well before their LF crossover point. I think the argument for u / h frame open baffle subs makes sense here.

In any case controlled directivity speakers pushing into low bass territory are not known to be 'easy' to get right ( huge horn systems or danley type for example)

Is this an example of early audio scientists stumbling onto a good topology or did they know more ;)
 

kodomo

Well-Known Member
Apr 26, 2017
1,004
1,615
330
First lets sort out the mystery of Altec horn loading midbass with measurements;
828G loads around 180hz
816A about 180hz as well
dual 515's in 817 loads around 120-140hz
dual 515's in 210a again loads around 180hz
altecresponses.jpeg


These are roughly where there is actually horn loading. Altecs use horn, direct radiator and bass reflex all at the same time in some of them.

Also, please also note not all horn loading is the same. As you can see from the examples some short horns are seemingly loading as low as my large horn. Please check the efficiency gain. Having those large throats does not let you load like you would like. Although I have an 12" driver, I do not have 12" throat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: christoph

kodomo

Well-Known Member
Apr 26, 2017
1,004
1,615
330
Here is the detail for my mid-bass throat

If you are interested in horns at all, please buy and read;
High Quality Horn Loudspeaker Systems
by Bjørn Kolbrek and Thomas Dunker
https://www.lean-business.co.uk/esh...-bjørn-kolbrek-and-thomas-dunker-p-3317.html
 

Attachments

  • Tractrix-100 - fi 174mmSmall.jpg
    Tractrix-100 - fi 174mmSmall.jpg
    17.7 KB · Views: 19

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,652
13,688
2,710
London
First lets sort out the mystery of Altec horn loading midbass with measurements;
828G loads around 180hz
816A about 180hz as well
dual 515's in 817 loads around 120-140hz
dual 515's in 210a again loads around 180hz
View attachment 64061


These are roughly where there is actually horn loading. Altecs use horn, direct radiator and bass reflex all at the same time in some of them.

Also, please also note not all horn loading is the same. As you can see from the examples some short horns are seemingly loading as low as my large horn. Please check the efficiency gain. Having those large throats does not let you load like you would like. Although I have an 12" driver, I do not have 12" throat.

So figure 3 is showing 100 db at 100 Hz?
 

kodomo

Well-Known Member
Apr 26, 2017
1,004
1,615
330

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,652
13,688
2,710
London

kodomo

Well-Known Member
Apr 26, 2017
1,004
1,615
330
Where is the horn gain stopping

I have written that and also attached the measurements! You can even see port tuning frequencies, there is impedance along the spl...
 

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,652
13,688
2,710
London
From figure 3, what I am seeing is, the top line (horn cabinet) is averaging around 105 db and going down to 100 db at 100Hz, and flatlining at 100 db till 60ish Hz, after which it drops off (must be the Fc of the horn).

You can never turn the vents off, shown on the bottom line, and they must be contributing, but they take over alone (no horn) towards the bottom and are giving 90db at 20Hz, as per the graph.
 
Last edited:

kodomo

Well-Known Member
Apr 26, 2017
1,004
1,615
330
From figure 3, what I am seeing is, the top line (horn cabinet) is averaging around 105 db and going down to 100 db at 100Hz, and flatlining at 100 db till 60ish Hz, after which it drops off (must be the Fc of the horn).

You can never turn the vents off, shown on the bottom line, and they must be contributing, but they take over alone (no horn) towards the bottom and are giving 90db at 20Hz, as per the graph.

You can see the rising responses, showing where horn provides the gain. If you just read the numbers I wrote and correlate them, it may have been easy to see, maybe I could not explain myself.

For ex. the figure 3, you can see the rising response from 100hz where horn loading starts and loads fully at about 140hz. This is horn loaded from about 140hz.

You can also find the tuning of the port out of the impedance graphics. It resides in the low point between the two peaks. Sealed has one peak, vented has two peaks. In a very basic sense, the low peak is related to the vent and the higher one is mostly about the damping of the box. So figure 3 seems to have port tuning frequency around 50hz.

Dear Ked, you are serious about sound reproduction maybe it is time to read on some theory to have a foundation and correlate what you hear to what is going on. You have listened to a lot of hifi equipment, I hope you also visit some music studio control rooms and meet engineers to have a balanced view. The way to a great start could be reading this book;
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8619 2.JPG
    IMG_8619 2.JPG
    224.9 KB · Views: 24

LL21

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2010
14,430
2,518
1,448
From figure 3, what I am seeing is, the top line (horn cabinet) is averaging around 105 db and going down to 100 db at 100Hz, and flatlining at 100 db till 60ish Hz, after which it drops off (must be the Fc of the horn).

You can never turn the vents off, shown on the bottom line, and they must be contributing, but they take over alone (no horn) towards the bottom and are giving 90db at 20Hz, as per the graph.
You've probably seen this, but was looking at subs and saw that Funk Audio custom makes these dual 15" FLHs and thought you might be interested...

https://www.funkaudio.ca/store/p46/15.H_Horn_subwoofer_Custom_order.html
 

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,652
13,688
2,710
London
You've probably seen this, but was looking at subs and saw that Funk Audio custom makes these dual 15" FLHs and thought you might be interested...

https://www.funkaudio.ca/store/p46/15.H_Horn_subwoofer_Custom_order.html

Thanks. Just to clarify the 15 inch dual woofer front loaded horns I was writing about are for Midbass. These are for the next level down. this is one 15 for the lower bass. Leif has made himself one 21 inch. There are other solutions as well including the open baffle type multiwoofer with a slit in the middle of the plane that Western electric had demoed at Munich last year. But all those require space.
 

LL21

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2010
14,430
2,518
1,448
Thanks. Just to clarify the 15 inch dual woofer front loaded horns I was writing about are for Midbass. These are for the next level down. this is one 15 for the lower bass. Leif has made himself one 21 inch. There are other solutions as well including the open baffle type multiwoofer with a slit in the middle of the plane that Western electric had demoed at Munich last year. But all those require space.
Got it. Would you also consider dual FLH for low bass?
 

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,652
13,688
2,710
London
Got it. Would you also consider dual FLH for low bass?

It is not as important to me. I don't think I am adamant on a type of solution there. It should roll over properly from the Midbass horn, and give sufficient weight, ambience, detail. I have heard good Midbass with a big front loaded horn, sealed subs, and there are also cheap horn loaded DIY alternatives the size of a small fridge to be kept in the corner. All could work.
 

LL21

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2010
14,430
2,518
1,448
It is not as important to me. I don't think I am adamant on a type of solution there. It should roll over properly from the Midbass horn, and give sufficient weight, ambience, detail. I have heard good Midbass with a big front loaded horn, sealed subs, and there are also cheap horn loaded DIY alternatives the size of a small fridge to be kept in the corner. All could work.
Thanks. Good to know.
 

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,652
13,688
2,710
London
Thanks. Good to know.

The main thing for me is the dual woofer FLH for the Midbass. That is what integrates the speaker and is the Achilles heel of most, in fact nearly all speakers. The upper mids, highs, and lower bass can be managed to preferences. Want density and roll off? Easy. Want clean extended highs? Equally easy. And so on.
 

LL21

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2010
14,430
2,518
1,448
The main thing for me is the dual woofer FLH for the Midbass. That is what integrates the speaker and is the Achilles heel of most, in fact nearly all speakers. The upper mids, highs, and lower bass can be managed to preferences. Want density and roll off? Easy. Want clean extended highs? Equally easy. And so on.
Will bear that in mind.
 

marmota

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2016
260
247
275
The main thing for me is the dual woofer FLH for the Midbass. That is what integrates the speaker and is the Achilles heel of most, in fact nearly all speakers. The upper mids, highs, and lower bass can be managed to preferences. Want density and roll off? Easy. Want clean extended highs? Equally easy. And so on.

Very interesting comment, some speaker designers such as Troels Gravesen say that it takes quite a lot of surface area to achieve a full bodied, real sounding pair of speakers. IE: he uses 8' midranges down to 160hz + 15' woofer, 6.5' midranges never lower than 200hz, you get the point. Maybe is the huge surface area + high efficiency what makes the sound compelling and not the partial horn loading? With a huge Onken style cabinet and the right drivers (ie: 15' Supravox 400 EXC field coil or AE TD18H) and some room gain it should be possible to achieve a sensitivity around 100db, and you wouldn't need subs.

Btw this is just a random thought, I'm not knocking down the FLH, just regurgitating some ideas, of course the FLH would be more even more efficient, but would take some serious real state compared to the already huge (around 400l cabinet) Onken style speakers.
 
Last edited:

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing