From my personal experience when I had both formats, I totally agree with that premise.
Peter, I've just put in the equivalent of two dozen pricey and not so pricey changes to my vinyl playback, and really gone to town on optimisation. The Stacore platform being the most visible and significant change.
My cdp, only a half dozen changes.
And so, from a start where my analog and digital cost the same, my vinyl playback is now 2x cost outlay of my cdp. I've gone as far as I can w my analog short of starting again and investing in a GP Monaco or Vyger. So, yes I've done my best to optimise both sources.
I'm serious. It could be the best two dacs are the MSB Select II and the MSB Reference.
I believe I have the answer to the question I posed to Paul yesterday: Paul prefers digital not for convenience and not for any business strategy reason but because he truly believes that digital is the best sounding source medium for his listening preferences.
Peter, I cant see any argument that listening position, speaker set up etc would make any difference here. Thats crazy.
But get noise supression right, and your digital will transform (power cables, grounding, dedicated lines, balanced power, fuses all make more difference to my digital than my analog).
Get vibration isolation right, and your analog will transform (Stacore and Rollerblocks under tt and phono count for more than under cdp).
Since Ive gone to town on both sources I feel Ive optimised both, and am more source agnostic than Ive ever been before.
But LP measuring better? Have you ever seen the crooked graph of a 1 kHz sine wave from LP? It's an embarrassing sight, frankly. You can argue that it doesn't matter, and perhaps that is true. You can also argue that LP sounds better. But LP measuring better? That's a joke.
So how I hear that Select II??? Any local owners???
Hi Marc,
Actually I don’t think it is crazy at all that one could have different speaker positioning and seating preference for an analogue versus digital setup.
If you do a room sweep with an LP (with your analogue rig) and a digital file (with your dac), you could see quite different results. This will likely occur for sure at the bottom end and also at the highest end (probably elsewhere too). Since bass is so linked to speaker positioning then you could easily have optimum positions dependent on source. Without over complicating things, the reduced channel separation of analogue may also mean that you prefer staging with your speakers in one position more for one format over the other.
I believe MSB will be at AXPONA. That'll be a good opportunity. Let me know if you're truly interested, and we can schedule a private listening time with them, and you can bring your music, etc.
Or, if you want to get out of the cold, you can come to San Diego, where we have a few systems with SELECT that we can use for demos
cheers,
Alex
I could see this also. In fact, I could see moving speaker toe-in very slightly to account for slight tonal balance shifts between cartridges. But, who would ever be willing to make such adjustments? I presume most of us would simply rather enjoy the different presentations each different component presents to the listener.
One of my audio buddies here just mentioned to our audio group that he has made recent changes to his system so that a digital and an analog recording of the same performance now sound virtually identical through his system. I had always thought these recordings were mastered differently. I find this pretty interesting and look forward to hearing the comparison one day.
How do you know you are not missing anything?
I believe MSB will be at AXPONA. That'll be a good opportunity. Let me know if you're truly interested, and we can schedule a private listening time with them, and you can bring your music, etc.
Or, if you want to get out of the cold, you can come to San Diego, where we have a few systems with SELECT that we can use for demos
cheers,
Alex
Marc, I'm not asking about what number or cost of specific improvements one has made to one format over the other. I take Paul's comments to mean that the room, speaker/listening seat positioning, ancillary gear, acoustic treatments, etc. etc. are developed in such a way to optimize one format over the other.
I'm not asking about specific improvements to only one source component or the other. Paul seems to imply that it is a much greater system wide optimization that is necessary to get the best out of each format, and that the choices one makes are different, perhaps radically, depending on whether he wants to optimize digital or analog.
Am I missing what Paul means with his assertion?
Alex, I am planning a trip to San Diego in early May. I'll contact you as I would enjoy meeting you and hearing your demo rooms.
. . . I loved your comment about about PM "secretly sacrificing some sound quality to secure convenience and consistency". With all due respect, how would you have any idea what PM is thinking / feeling and is secretly sacrificing? IMHO, totally speculative / presumptive on your part, with no basis in fact or anything else for that matter except for your profound analogue / anti digital bias.
Thanks for the clarification but I believe your previous posts send a very mixed message.
But I need to reiterate that this debate is all about nothing. People like what they like regardless of contrarion personal preferences. No one is changing anyone's mind.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |