Taiko Audio
Great report and thank you for your time spent doing this especially with you kit which is held in such high esteem in the Audiophile world, I was leaning towards buying the Sotm switch with the clock option (not the upgraded caps and silver wiring version though for the reasons you and several people have previously pointed out) and a Cybershaft clock, but i think I will simply save some money and just by an Etherregen, I was also seriously considering buying the M12 Gold but then I would not be able to use my Sablon ethernet cable that I purchased recently and found to be outstanding,
Time to push the button and buy a Etherregen which by all accounts seems a rare true bargain.
Best wishes
RGMD11
Hi Emile,
which was the best sounding configuration with the ER:
Copper B-side to Fiber A-side
or
Copper and Fiber both connected to the A-side?
Thanks
Matt
Hi Emile,Around 200 hours.
I am planning to replace the above-mentioned 13m Supra Cat8 with a fiber optic cable to see any further improvement over my current setup.
Hi Emile, thanks for your advice.Hi vhs,
Thanks for sharing, do take the effort to try different SFP modules when testing fiber optics, the ER performs very poorly with the Startech SFP1000ZXST SFPs which are my preferred modules in any other scenario! Are those Double Crowns btw?
What network card are you using in The Extreme ?
Intel or Startech ?
Hi Emaile. Thanks for a great report.Audiophile switch comparisons:
"Signal" path from main switch to Extreme:
1) 1 meter audiophile RJ45 copper cable -> Startech FMC -> 10 meter fiber cable -> Startech FMC -> Telegartner MFP8 Gold II RJ45-M12 copper cable -> Telegartner GOLD M12 switch -> Telegartner MFP8 Gold II M12-RJ45 copper cable -> Extreme
Hi Emaile. Thanks for a great report.
In the other 4 cases, you connect the switch to Extreme using fiber, but with the M12, you had a somewhat convoluted setup (a) with copper - fiber - copper to M12 and (b) use copper to Extreme instead of fiber.
Can you throw some light on why pls?
Clarity and transparency are reduced versus a fiber connection, but this is easily remedied by preceding it with 2 Startech FMCs with a fiber cable in between. Interestingly reversing this setup, M12 GOLD -> copper -> FMC -> fiber -> Extreme does not work well at all
Hi vhs,
Thanks for sharing, do take the effort to try different SFP modules when testing fiber optics, the ER performs very poorly with the Startech SFP1000ZXST SFPs which are my preferred modules in any other scenario! Are those Double Crowns btw?
Hi Matt,
The copper B-side is 100Mbit, I have the Telegartner M12 MAGIC switch here which also runs at a 100Mbit speed. Both of these, though "pleasant" sounding, come with reduced levels of detail, ambient retrieval, dynamics and envelopment. Anecdotally I have spend some time testing 10Gbit networking which do take these type of traits up another notch, but unfortunately have not managed to find a way around a certain associated mechanical quality. Years ago, before our servers even existed, I used to reduce my networking speeds to 100Mbit (fiber) to get a less "digital" sound, most certainly a valid way to get better sound from say a mac mini, or an Intel Nuc. To answer your question directly, both fiber and copper connected to the A-side running at 1Gb.
Having explored these options, I do feel it to be my duty to repeat, the sheer magnitude of what can be gained here, IMHO, is still below what powercords, usb cables or proper vibration control can do for your sound when using the Extreme.
But we have to take into account that the impact of these switches is inferior to that of other components in systems with the Extreme.
What an excellent report, Emile. Thank you. Much appreciated. I had to finally register here, so I can post.
Interesting that you start your discussion talking about glare. I have noticed that certain type of network injected noise could be perceived as glare. This is typically a digital curtain between you and the music. In some cases it is something that people may like, even prefer. It’s also interesting what happens when this digital curtain / glare disappears. All of a sudden you realize what the instruments really sound like, but one may be too attached to the glare-y sound and may even prefer it. It is indeed a way to tweak your system.
One of my takeaways from Emile’s report is how dependent the network tweaking is on the local environment. It’s very important to keep in mind the context of his tests. And people should be careful how they read his report. He did not say that the etherREGEN is better than the SOTM. He said that the etherREGEN “was initially disappointing” but in a very specific scenario it sounded really good (and better than the SOTM combination he has tried). He also said that he has “done a brief check with a low power server prototype with no SFP port present running an audiophile Linux variant, and the results are very different”. You have to keep those things in mind. I hope the person who commented earlier that he changed his purchasing decision based on that report has an Extreme server or is planning to buy one. There are other reports that can be found comparing switches with different results in a different context.
I have been playing a lot with my home network recently. As some others have reported, replacing the all-in-one cable modem/router/firewall/etc. box the cable companies in the US provide with a dedicated cable modem and a dedicated router powered by good linear power supplies helps a lot. It makes a bigger difference than my etherREGEN switch.
I know Uptone was engineering the etherREGEN switch to be insusceptible to upstream devices and were thinking that the power supply would probably not matter. That’s what all DAC’s manufacturers would tell you too - it’s an asynchronous signal with galvanic isolation and reclocking, so the upstream device does not matter. Well, probably everyone reading this thread knows better. It is a similar story with the etherREGEN - although they created an excellent product that I like a lot, I found my system even more susceptible to upstream devices than before. The added resolution makes my system more sensitive on upstream network devices so they need good attention too. And powering the etherREGEN with a better than the stock power supply is an obvious improvement.
Back to my home network experiments. Modding the cable modem and routers (i.e. replacing the crappy caps in the power section) also helps. Better DC cables also help. Vibration control helps too.
I was doing an A/B comparison the other day by changing the DC power cable on my cable modem. I had two cables of the same length, materials, geometry and connectors, both broken in. One was shielded and the other one was not. I streamed a Qobuz track, switched the DC cable to my cable modem, and listened to the same track again. You could easily hear the effects of a shield on the DC cable to my cable modem! This was mind blowing. And to be honest, if someone else told me that I would not believe it! I would be like the guy with the white hat from another forum talking about measurements and expectation bias. BUT... I was able to clearly hear the difference from a shield on a DC cable connecting my cable modem.
I played with different routers and WiFi access points. And yes, they sound differently. Using a router without build-in WiFi between the cable modem and the etherREGEN removed a lot of that digital glare. From that experience I feel like the noise generated by the WiFi routers have big contribution to the digital glare. I am using Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X (and the SFP version) routers currently. I like those devices a lot. They have 12V DC input (unlike some of the bigger Ubiquiti devices), so they are easy to power up with LPS. They have a lot of functionality in a really small box with a really simple and nice PCB layout. And they are cheap and easy to configure (if you know what you are doing). For example, it took seconds to create a dedicated VLAN for my server on one of the ports, so my local network broadcast messages would never reach my server. It enables DHCP and routing automatically for you.
My network looks like this at the moment: Cable modem —> Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X SFP —> etherREGEN —> JCAT NIC on my server, all powered by good LPS, cables, etc. Let's ignore the ethernet cables to keep this post more simplified, but I have been playing with a lot of those too. That network set up sounds really good, but I need to add WiFi back. Luckily that router has a SFP port, so I am now playing with various ways of connecting a WiFi access point that is isolated by fiber. I have a second Ubiquiti router, a bunch of media convertors, so there are plenty of options, and I need to find which one works best for my network. A lot of tests ahead of me, but you get the idea of what I am trying to do.
Having said all that, I am curious what the entire upstream network looks like at Emile’s lab. I am also curious if Emile has done any testings with the JCAT Net Femto card in the Extreme. If the Telegartner GOLD M12 switch via copper to the Extreme sounds better than anything else, a logical next step would be to try connecting it to a JCAT NIC. But as we all know Emile is always many steps ahead of us. I was laughing at his comment about the etherREGEN grounding - of course he has tried that and probably every other combination with every switch we can think about. It's so good to have people like him in the industry.
Thanks so much for taking the deep-dive into this stuff, Emile!!
I'm looking forward to hearing where we can find this alternative SFP...
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |