Behavior law of high-end:
Some people get confused and troubled with OTHER people choices, independently of being analog or digital.
Well said....!
Behavior law of high-end:
Some people get confused and troubled with OTHER people choices, independently of being analog or digital.
Behavior law of high-end:
Some people get confused and troubled with OTHER people choices, independently of being analog or digital.
I think it's important to also view the whole transport question in terms of the actual musical approach of the user.
if one is into legacy CD's and mostly rock-pop-jazz then silver discs make complete sense as the main focus since that is where both the older music and current offerings are.
OTOH if one is seriously into classical, now the whole high resolution issue starts to tip the scales dramatically in favor of files and optimization for those files.
once a classical listener tastes what 88/24, 96/24, 176/24 and 192/24 can do for classical, and then they listen to 352/384-24/32 dxd files become the better choice. and most of this music is now mastered in these higher resolutions.
SACD discs do somewhat respond to this issue, but fall short of competing head on.....and ripping SACD's into dsd files is now quite easy and accessible.
and no transport gets into the dxd--Quad dsd territory in terms of performance.
Although I fully agree with you on the sound quality of DXD, I disagree in "OTOH if one is seriously into classical" argument. The past existence and current offer of quality music classical is largely in CD - HiRez has just a nice niche of music, but an extremely limited range and very repetitive. I read several classical music magazines and I can not buy all the new tittles that tempt me every month - I would not even have the time to listen to them!
IMHO if someone is seriously into classical music probably he will be listening most of the time to redbook.
But IMHO ripping SACD can not be considered as easy and accessible.
Micro, I respectfully disagree. There is a large number of smaller and larger companies that bring out an impressive number of high res files every month. To name just a few: think of large labels like Deutsche Grammophon and Decca. And what about Chandos and smaller Dutch labels like Channel Classics, Pentatone and Challenge Classics? If you for example look only at the latter lable, you will find a great variety of recordings, including vocal and non vocal music dating from (many) centuries ago.
And if you want you can include for example famous Decca, Deutsche Grammophon, RCA and EMI (opeta and non opeta) recordings from the fifties, sixties and seventies that are (re)released in high res format (mostly 24/96).
I surely do not have the time to listen to all the new downloads that come out every month!
This is what I love about my system. Except for r2r, I get to choose the music I like in the format I think is best. It gives me a incredible range for my library of tunes. If I didn't own a transport, I'd be tickled pink at the sound of high res files via my Vivaldi DAC/UPS/CLK. I have some high res files, mostly classical, in DSD2 or DXD, not available on SACD, that just sound fantastic.
I'll add smaller labels like Eudora and 2L to your list...
This is what I love about my system. Except for r2r, I get to choose the music I like in the format I think is best. It gives me a incredible range for my library of tunes. If I didn't own a transport, I'd be tickled pink at the sound of high res files via my Vivaldi DAC/UPS/CLK. I have some high res files, mostly classical, in DSD2 or DXD, not available on SACD, that just sound fantastic.
I'll add smaller labels like Eudora and 2L to your list...
Agree with you, Jfrech. Still own and really love my (refurbisched and four box) Zanden combination. But I also really love - for example - my dsd 256 and dxd files from Challenge Classics.
Your system is a great line up of some of the best high-end has to offer; would love to hear the DCS current full stack and that whole collection of gear, cables and speakers together!
Likewise a fan of Zanden! Thinking about your Zanden ugrades/mods, I am tempted to speak with Audiocom who is based here in the UK and does a lot of DAC modd'ing. I think it would be easier than having to ship overseas.
Fair enough Lloyd. But beware that the (unique) character of your Zanden combo will remain intact!
So to do it all right, it requires extreme skills, be it a transport or a server or a DAC - just look at the Baetis Reference 2 details, where they claim an internal digital cable makes a huge difference. Excerpts from http://baetisaudio.com/Baetis_Reference_II.php:
Regarding USB, there is very good reason why there exist USB-to-AES/EBU bridges, and that's to isolate noise and potentially reclock with higher accuracy; but they are all band-aids, no matter how good they are. The Baetis, instead, sports a custom motherboard with AES/EBU directly out of it. It still has ways to go to be slaved to a DAC, and although USB is a natural candidate for slaving a server, it is extremely noisy as an interface.
Tasos
I'm intrigued by the Baetis Reference Server. Do you have one/heard one? Anyone?
Marty
Micro, I respectfully disagree. There is a large number of smaller and larger companies that bring out an impressive number of high res files every month. To name just a few: think of large labels like Deutsche Grammophon and Decca. And what about Chandos and smaller Dutch labels like Channel Classics, Pentatone and Challenge Classics? If you for example look only at the latter lable, you will find a great variety of recordings, including vocal and non vocal music dating from (many) centuries ago.
And if you want you can include for example famous Decca, Deutsche Grammophon, RCA and EMI (opera and non opera) recordings from the fifties, sixties and seventies that are (re)released in high res format (mostly 24/96).
I surely do not have the time to listen to all the new downloads that come out every month!
Likewise a fan of Zanden! Thinking about your Zanden ugrades/mods, I am tempted to speak with Audiocom who is based here in the UK and does a lot of DAC modd'ing. I think it would be easier than having to ship overseas.
Please note Mike was addressing DXD files. Unfortunately it is always the same type of limited repertoire from small HiRez labels. And, owning more than one thousand of great classic LPs, at this point I agree with the vinyl fans - no 24/96 file approaches an original LP of the famous recordings of fifties, sixties and seventies. And probably we will never have access to DXD transcriptions of these great recordings, the labels do not want to give access to such ultimate quality files, they are their gold egg hen ...
Why just picking from a few small lakes when you can pick from all the ocean? Yesterday I had a great time listening to Villa Lobos. Very soon I will probably listen to some Berlioz, I have read an article about his music recently - and I do not want to listen to Symphonie Fantastique again ...
Lloyd,
Please do not do it if you can not listen to it in your system with time before doing it! You have a great combo, if you want to listen to DSD get a Lampizator ...
Metronome made several changes in their DACs, upgrading from C2A to the C8 and C8+ that can play Hirez and DSD. I still prefer the old C2A for CD playing. The C8 has better bass control - you can choose from SS or tune output - but the Kalista or Calypso with the C2A is more "natural" .
Lloyd,
Please do not do it if you can not listen to it in your system with time before doing it! You have a great combo, if you want to listen to DSD get a Lampizator ...
Metronome made several changes in their DACs, upgrading from C2A to the C8 and C8+ that can play Hirez and DSD. I still prefer the old C2A for CD playing. The C8 has better bass control - you can choose from SS or tune output - but the Kalista or Calypso with the C2A is more "natural" .