And since most masters are digital
If you only listen to contemporary recordings.
And since most masters are digital
Even if you listen to old music ,digital is still better Becaue like I said , it's indistinguishable from the master,digital or analogIf you only listen to contemporary recordings.
Even if you listen to old music ,digital is still better Becaue like I said , it's indistinguishable from the master,digital or analog
Yeah , sorry that facts and science are boring ...
Even if you listen to old music ,digital is still better Becaue like I said , it's indistinguishable from the master,digital or analog
why do you then keep replying to himAudioGod,
Honestly mate, you are embarrassing yourself! Give it a rest!
why do you then keep replying to him
I haven't, this is my first reply to him!
Why are you picking on me? LOL
I don't get the criticism somehow
This whole thread's purpose is to compare digital to vinyl and vice versa.
Without discussing the value proposition, the original question isn’t being addressed.I don't get the criticism somehow
This whole thread's purpose is to compare digital to vinyl and vice versa.
Interesting, I just listened to these two. The “cheap vinyl“ as Peter puts it, sounds awful to me. Harsh and aggressive. Sounds like bad digital. The room recording, with all its disadvantages, sounds much better to me..That is quite a contrast. The cheap vinyl sounds much better to me at least. The problem is that the systems and rooms and set up are so different that it is hard to make any conclusions about vinyl vs. digital from these two examples. But yes, no contest here.
I hear tape hiss on many of 1960 classical and jazz CD's. And it's part of the original recording and not a system noise artifact. For example, try the early Miles mono recordings or the Mercury Living Presence CD's. If you do not hear it on the vinyl version, I would question the accuracy of the system.Wow. So many of you have never heard a great tape or vinyl playback system, that is SAD.
There is NO hiss and NO background noise of any kind with a great turntable, and I imagine with a top tire R2R.
Go to a show - at least - and listen to an SAT/AF0/1/Nagra TT.
Who is "all of us"? An extremely flawed generalization.However, all of us have found that digital rarely lives up to it's prgeneralization.
In the ways that matter, resolution, dynamic range, how close to the actual performance that they just recorded etc. etc. They discussed it at length. I suggest you interview them yourself in a YT video.What is their metric or criteria for "superior," "best" and "best quality"?