FWIW, there have been a few other back page interviewees with similar views of LP (not necessarily all analog), and an interview with Doug Sax to which I've referred previously where he also expressed wonderment that he was mastering LP's again (in his case, usually from 24/192 digital files) since he felt the 24/192 digital files sounded better than the resulting LP's.
Let's face it. Studios use digital not because it sounds good but because of the ease of editing and being able to make someone who sounds like a cat singing in a back alley into Joan Sutherland. 'Dats a fact.
Let's face it. Studios use digital not because it sounds good but because of the ease of editing and being able to make someone who sounds like a cat singing in a back alley into Joan Sutherland. 'Dats a fact.
Let's face it. Studios use digital not because it sounds good but because of the ease of editing and being able to make someone who sounds like a cat singing in a back alley into Joan Sutherland. 'Dats a fact.
Nah. Having worked part time in recording studios for 10 years in New York, and living next door
to a recording engineer who worked on 5 Springsteen records...there is no misunderstanding.
So many of today's manufactured pop stars have no real singing talent that they have to run their voices through auto tune pitch correction and other outboard devices in order to make them sound like 10% of a real singer with talent.
So many of today's manufactured pop stars have no real singing talent that they have to run their voices through auto tune pitch correction and other outboard devices in order to make them sound like 10% of a real singer with talent.
But that has nothing to do with digital or analog. In the old days they would punch in singers line by line if they had trouble. And they wold also
comp dozens of takes.
Not to mention old tricks like double tracking, using harmonizers..etc...
The early Beatles albums used lots of double tracking, but it wasn't because John and Paul didn't have good voices. Now on George they used double tracking in order to fill his voice out because it was pretty thin. With John and Paul, it was just an effect that sounded pretty cool.
The early Beatles albums used lots of double tracking, but it wasn't because John and Paul didn't have good voices. Now on George they used double tracking in order to fill his voice out because it was pretty thin. With John and Paul, it was just an effect that sounded pretty cool.
+1. I am recording format neutral. But I absolutely do have a soft spot for analog tape. While technically inferior to high resolution digital,
it is many cases it is more musical.