Hopkins' System

I will be writing a review of the powerDAC-SX, to summarize my "experience", and have asked ECDesigns for pictures of the internals, which they provided (it avoids having to open it up myself):

SX Internal.jpeg

This version actually has an XLR output for headphones (front right).

From rear to front:

- Left and right programmable linear power supplies for the left and right Power D/A converters.
- Left and right black transformers for phantom power supplies for the left and right power D/A converters.
- Center transformer = Linear DAPI power supply.
- Center front board = DAPI board (Digital Audio Parallel Interface)
- Front center = Display keys and IR module
- Left and right front = Power D/A converters for left and right channel
- Power D/A converter board power resistors are cooled through heat pads to the chassis.

The DAPI is the "module" that buffers the incoming Toslink signal, determines the incoming sampling rate (44kHz, 48kHz...), and outputs the data to parallel low-bandwidth signals feeding the resistor array. The clock on the DAPI board operates separately from the data signal (the incoming clock signal is not recovered) to time the data send to the resistors (in my own words). Here is the summary that they write on their website:

Incoming Toslink signal (low bandwidth) is sampled by a discrete custom DAPI (Digital Audio Parallel Interface) receiver. It scrapes only data from Toslink and -does not recover any clocks- for sample timing.

Audio data is first stored in a buffer memory. Next it is output in -parallel- (up to 48 separate I/O lines). The single timing sample signal is divided down from a completely independent, local low jitter masterclock.

So we have parallel data (up to 48 I/O lines) and a latch pulse signal that is divided down from the masterclock and has minimal energy (minimal energy = minimal power = minimal unwanted crosstalk).

We do not generate nor use any conventional I2S or similar serial interface signals in our PowerDACs, so related crosstalk issues are completely eliminated.



There is no "amplification"! The output level is only determined by the programmable power supply (and some bit-shifting). I'll add some explanations about that.
 
Last edited:
My love affair with the powerDAC-SX & Teufel speaker combo continues. I can't explain it!



The playback chain here is Qobuz, streamed through the LMS plugin (LMS is installed on my non-optimized desktop computer). The player is a RaspberryPi 3 model B, with USB output to the ECDesigns UT96 Toslink converter (max 96khz). The RaspberryPi is connected to the network with a basic ethernet RJ45 cable plugged in directly to my ISP's router. No audiophile network switches and reclockers/decrappifiers required :)

Sounds very nice to my ears. Engaging, very easy and relaxing to listen to.
 
Last edited:
ECDesigns recommends using their UT96 USB-Toslink converter to get the best sound quality (at least that's my understanding). The UT96 is simpler than the UT192, which uses an xmos chip, I believe.

My WiiM Pro does not have a USB output, but I was curious to try this USB converter again. Some time ago I had briefly compared the WiiM Pro to a raspberry Pi using a variety of digital HATs and had not found significant differences.

I resurrected a Stack Audio Link 2 that was collecting dust in a closet (I got it a few years ago and had not bothered selling it back yet). I connected it to the UT96 using the short Uptone Audio USBPCB A/B adapter. I connected the Link 2 to my network using a wired connection.

This setup sound very good - best I've heard in my system. I don't really know why. Maybe the solid aluminum casing of the Link 2 is beneficial in reducing interferences (I can't turn off my neighbours' wifi...)? Maybe the short USB adapter is preferable to a standard USB cable? Perhaps what makes a small difference here is specific to my system and listening environment, and someone else may have different results...

In theory, differences in digital sources should be greatly reduced with the powerDAC. I sincerely believe they are. ECDesigns explains that even with an optical connection and a DAC that is not using the optical signal's clock, there is still some differences in source quality, albeit smaller than with other "high bandwidth" electrical connections. I don't understand the technical aspects. These subtle differences seem to be audible. There also seems to be less limitations in what we can hear with the "minimalistic" signal path of the PowerDAC-SX...

Would a vastly more expensive digital source sound better? I'm not interested in finding out, and spending ridiculous amounts of money in the process! This setup sounds great, and I will leave it at that. Well recorded and mastered digital albums sound incredibly vivid, on par with well produced LPs. Enough said.



PXL_20240709_214416560.jpg

The main advantage of the WiiM Pro, for me, is it's digital input which I use for my turntable/ADC. I'll figure something out if I keep using the Link 2.

One concern I have with the WiiM Pro is the fact that the software gets frequently updated, and this often generates issues (which are then fixed in new releases). Given that I only use few features, I rather have a "stable" solution. The Link 2 has LMS (squeezelite) and Spotify, and that's all I need. The WiiM's Qobuz app is a little nicer than the LMS plugin, but I mostly use Qobuz with its own app, to select favorites and maintain a few playlists. The LMS app works well enough to play Qobuz favorites and playlists.
 
Last edited:
Johnny Hodges, once again:


Source is a ripped CD.

Is the system "accurate"? Not by a mile. You can find flaws in just about everything.

Does the system sound "natural"? I've never heard Johnny Hodges in person, so how would I know?

But do I like it? YES! I love it.
 
Last edited:
In reply to @morricab 's comment in this post...


There is no conventional amplification in the powerDAC-SX (and related products). The signal that is output is not the digital signal converted to analog and amplified.

In their documentation, ECDesigns shows the overall schematic of the powerDAC-SX:


Screenshot 2024-07-10 164833.jpg

My understanding (but I have very limited technical knowledge) is that the digital signal (split up into individual bits) only activates "on/off" gates to a series of resistor (one per "bit"?) through which the power signal gets "attenuated" (and then summed). So the signal only really goes through one component - resistors. There is not "amplification".

What they explain on their website is not "marketing" as someone qualified it:

"[The PowerDAC-SX] It is basically a high power multibit DAC that drives the speaker directly using just a large number of power MOSFET switches and a power resistor array. Because of this fundamentally different (almost all digital) setup we get some new properties that are not possible to obtain using conventional (digital) amplifiers [...quasi constant power steering and no local or global feedback loops]".

Is any of this relevant for us "end users"? Everyone can do what they want with it. I find it interesting.
 
Last edited:
In reply to @morricab 's comment in this post...


There is no conventional amplification in the powerDAC-SX (and related products). The signal that is output is not the digital signal converted to analog and amplified.

In their documentation, ECDesigns shows the overall schematic of the powerDAC-SX:


View attachment 133634

My understanding (but I have very limited technical knowledge) is that the digital signal (split up into individual bits) only activates "on/off" gates to a series of resistor (one per "bit"?) through which the power signal gets "attenuated" (and then summed). So the signal only really goes through one component - resistors. There is not "amplification".

What they explain on their website is not "marketing" as someone qualified it:

"[The PowerDAC-SX] It is basically a high power multibit DAC that drives the speaker directly using just a large number of power MOSFET switches and a power resistor array. Because of this fundamentally different (almost all digital) setup we get some new properties that are not possible to obtain using conventional (digital) amplifiers [...quasi constant power steering and no local or global feedback loops]".

Is any of this relevant for us "end users"? Everyone can do what they want with it. I find it interesting.
It is some kind of high speed switching amp, where the transistors are turned on and off directly from PCM of a DAC. I think the TACT Millenium was similar.
 
It is some kind of high speed switching amp, where the transistors are turned on and off directly from PCM of a DAC. I think the TACT Millenium was similar.

No, it's a completely different technology. The SX uses a multi-bit digital signal and no transistors.
 
It is some kind of high speed switching amp, where the transistors are turned on and off directly from PCM of a DAC. I think the TACT Millenium was similar.
In fact, I had asked them a while ago about the difference with the Tact, and here was their answer (first paragraph is a summary of how the Tact works):

"Digital audio source data -> digital processing (DSP, bit-perfect playback is already lost here) -> pulse width modulated signal (one bit) -> power switch (one bit) -> low-pass filter (introduces phase errors) -> speaker.

It [Tact] is basically a high power, single bit (delta sigma) DAC.

Digital amplifiers (class-D) are different as these take an analogue input signal and convert it into a PWM signal using a comparator circuit. The Tact Milenium skips this analogue signal path and converts data directly into a PWM signal.

Our PowerDAC is a true 44 bit multi-bit power D/A converter that outputs an analogue voltage, -not- a low pass filtered PWM signal. This is a completely different technology.

Digital audio data -> fractal decoder (lossless) -> 44 bit switches / channel -> power resistor array (programmable voltage attenuator) -> analogue output signal -> speaker.

The idea to design a PowerDAC originated in the idea of leaving out all active linear circuits like buffers and OP-amps and still provide low output impedance (usually only possible by using active buffer circuits)."
 
Also, some further comments on single versus multi-bit DACs...

"Multi bit DACs offer advantages over single bit DACs (delta sigma). It is obvious that when the entire audio signal and its entire dynamic range have to be represented by one pulse from one single bit, things become -extremely- critical. The slightest deviation in timing (jitter) or supply voltage (ripple, noise) and the signal ends up being significantly distorted. Because of the on/off switching from one single bit, a lot of noise is produced and this noise cannot be filtered out entirely. So these 1 bit converters all have a noise problem.

Multi bit DACs reproduce the signal using many (16 ... 24) bits, so the influence of each bit is far less compared to a modern single bit DAC, noise is also way lower. The PowerDAC even has 44 bits, so things get far less critical compared to a 24 bit multi-bit DAC.

But the problem with multi bit is that the signal is generated by combining bits. The problem here is that all bits must change state at exactly the same moment and as fast as possible. If not, glitches (spikes) will occur during sample change. Even if we attempt to filter out these spikes, contained energy will still cause distortion.

This is the biggest problem with multi bit, especially when scaling up converter power like with the PowerDACs. One effective solution is the fractal segment that greatly reduces glitch amplitude. There are other methods like using Gray code."

This was written at the time of the previous S model. The SX solves the issue of bit errors (glitches) slightly differently, but it's way too complicated for me to understand... There are many over improvements to the SX that are interesting but too complex for me to understand...Sorry!
 
Last edited:
I'm always curious to know what makes a product "special" or "unique", but I don't pretend to really understand any of it, and the devil is in the details. It has been very interesting, however, to communicate with John and Gordon Brown (the brothers behind ECD) over the years, and witness how these products are actually developed.

There's theory - these guys go through scientific papers and come up with new ideas. There are "lab measurements", to test those theories out. And there's a lot of trial and error.

I've been a customer of ECDesigns for many years now, and I am glad that I had faith in them. Their products did not always perform as they hoped, but they kept on working to improve them, always challenging themselves and trying out different approaches.

The SX is the culmination of all those years of "R&D". It's a mature product.

What I find interesting now, is that I see how the sound quality is really the result of the technology used to produce it (or at minimum, the general approach). There are no miracles in audio...
 
Last edited:
Two years ago, after writing a review of their previous model, I communicated with a well respected audio reviewer, whose name you would all be familiar with. Here is what he told me:

"I read your interesting review of the DAC/speaker combination, something I considered myself, though only in my imagination, not knowing whether it was even possible to implement or not.
...
I hope they are able to publicly display their unique components sometime in the near future. More serious audiophiles should be aware of this company."

They are well respected as engineers, but their products are still "confidential" in a sense. They may have suffered from putting out so many models over the years. Every year or two they came up with a new DAC! I never saw that as a problem, but some got cold feet, which I can understand.
 
No, it's a completely different technology. The SX uses a multi-bit digital signal and no transistors.
Sorry, it says clearly in the website description that there are power MOSFETS switching on and off, modulating the power supply. Go read the product description again.
 
Well I have a multi bit DAC that has sufficient output that no op amp or tubes are needed for it to drive a preamp. ECdesign has figured out how to boost their DAC output to drive speakers. They are using power MOSFETS to do this…how that works exactly without PWM, I am not clear.
 
Well I have a multi bit DAC that has sufficient output that no op amp or tubes are needed for it to drive a preamp. ECdesign has figured out how to boost their DAC output to drive speakers. They are using power MOSFETS to do this…how that works exactly without PWM, I am not clear.

Yes, I see that you don't get it. They are not "boosting the DAC output" and no they are not using power MOSFETS to do this. Let's move on, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I see that you don't get it. They are not "boosting the DAC output" and no they are not using power MOSFETS to do this. Let's move on, thanks.
Look they state in their description. You are not a technical guy, right? So, don’t now tell me I don’t understand something you clearly don’t.

Read what you wrote above…power MOSFET switches. Note in the diagram where the power supply is connected…at the power MOSFET switches. They are using that as the output stage of their DAC and it has sufficient grunt to drive speakers.
 
Last edited:
Look they state in their description. You are not a technical guy, right? So, don’t now tell me I don’t understand something you clearly don’t.

How they use MOSFET switches is what I was correcting you about.

Just give them a call if you want clarification on how their products work. Their number is on their website.
 
I saw today that Aaron Diehl, a pianist that I really like, is having a show in New York on July 20th, accompanying some good singers. Lucky New Yorkers can attend this, but I can't. The venue, however sells tickets to view the show "online". I was not aware that small venues were doing this now. I thought I would give it a try. The online ticket let's you view the show within three days of the live event.


Maybe this will interest someone here.
 
Last edited:
Lewis Porter just posted an article about an unissued 1941 recording of Nat King Cole at Monroe's Uptown House (which I had used in a short clip of my speakers some time ago):


Here's the recording, if you want to listen to it in your system:


Comments by Jan Evensmo in his "solography" of Nat King Cole (https://www.jazzarcheology.com/nat-king-cole/):

"A magnificent recently discovered treasury which has been shelved at home for half-a-century without anybody noticed! For seven minutes in excellent sound, NKC shows that he certainly was part of the development of modern jazz taking place in Harlem, a fireworks of creative piano artistry!"

We can smile at his appreciation of the sound quality, but it is indeed very good given the context: a portable recording in a jazz club in 1941! Who is going to complain?

Jerry Newman, a Columbia student who frequented those clubs, recorded this with a portable Wilcox-Gay Recordio:


Here's a demo of how it works (similar model):

 
Last edited:

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu