Hopkins' System

Speaking of the Philadelphia science museum, they have here a fun interactive experiment:


Here's what they describe as "the science behind it":

In this activity, you hear a sentence that has been distorted by a computer. The sounds are muddled and squeaky, and it is tricky to understand what is being said. Then you hear the same sentence without distortion, for instance: “There’s coffee on that seat.” A woman’s voice speaks clearly, making it easy to understand.

Surprisingly, when you go back and listen to the distorted sentence again, you can understand the muddled words. Your brain is now using existing knowledge – from the clear sentence that you heard – to interpret that information. Once your brain knows what is being said, it applies the information and makes sense of the distorted sound.

Sometimes, your brain takes in sensory data layer by layer to piece together what’s happening. This is called “bottom-up processing.” More often - as is happening in this activity - your brain operates in a “top-down” manner, making predictions based on previous knowledge. This saves time, but because each person’s prior experiences are unique, top-down processing can cause people to perceive the same information in different ways.


Does it apply to how we experience music on our audio systems? Why not?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scott Naylor
Speaking of the Philadelphia science museum, they have here a fun interactive experiment:


Here's what they describe as "the science behind it":

In this activity, you hear a sentence that has been distorted by a computer. The sounds are muddled and squeaky, and it is tricky to understand what is being said. Then you hear the same sentence without distortion, for instance: “There’s coffee on that seat.” A woman’s voice speaks clearly, making it easy to understand.

Surprisingly, when you go back and listen to the distorted sentence again, you can understand the muddled words. Your brain is now using existing knowledge – from the clear sentence that you heard – to interpret that information. Once your brain knows what is being said, it applies the information and makes sense of the distorted sound.

Sometimes, your brain takes in sensory data layer by layer to piece together what’s happening. This is called “bottom-up processing.” More often - as is happening in this activity - your brain operates in a “top-down” manner, making predictions based on previous knowledge. This saves time, but because each person’s prior experiences are unique, top-down processing can cause people to perceive the same information in different ways.


Does it apply to how we experience music on our audio systems? Why not?
Yes of course it applies
 
  • Like
Reactions: hopkins
Testing the Pixy by Sota phono stage:

PXL_20240822_234654374.jpg

I've got it plugged in to my M2Tech Joplin but with the EQ (RIAA) and gain deactivated, so the M2Tech is just working as an ADC and outputting a digital optical signal to the powerDAC-SX. I'm listening with a pair of Sennheiser HD6XX, for which I got a cable made to plug in to the speaker outputs of the SX. As a side note, these Sennheisers are great and really open up with balanced cables connected to the SX...

The sound quality of the Pixy seems really good, but I need more time to compare with the phono functions of the Joplin.

There is lots of detail, and it does seem "quiet", as advertised.

I'm using it with an MM cartridge.

Once again, the quality of some vinyl are coming through loud and clear even with a digital step in the process.

Digital albums (i.e. Qobuz streaming or my own files) can sound really good as well, especially modern recordings (but not only).
 
Last edited:
Has pretty low operating voltages , what other PP have you compared it to ..?

I have no other phono stages (aside for the Joplin's, which is DSP based).I wanted to try this one essentially to compare with the Joplin.

I've had cheaper phono stages! I feel the Pixy is definitely a good "bang for the buck". How it compares to much more expensive equipment, I don't know and will probably never know.

I guess my main comparison point is with digital. That may raise eyebrows, but it makes plenty of sense to me. Most of my listening is digital. I purchase vinyl once in a while, mainly original mono versions of records I really like (or albums which are not available in digital formats). My turntable is "entry level". I'm happy with the sound of those LPs and I don't feel the need to invest much more in analog playback equipment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Audiohertz2
Last edited:
The Pixy is not bad, but I have decided that the added complexity of plugging in a phono stage into my Joplin is just not worth it.

If the Pixy had an ADC and optical out, it would be a no brainier for me, and it would probably replace the Joplin as it is cheaper, smaller, and performs well enough. Maybe I'll write to them and suggest that for a future model...there is a market for a quality, budget friendly, phono stage with digital outputs.

The Joplin is sometimes a little "glitchy", for example the channel balance is sometimes off after changing the sampling rate. I do have a tiny bit of hum that I can hear when a record is not playing, but that is something I may be able to fix. I like the sound. I find that the gain setting on the Joplin is useful. I did "mod" the Joplin to output an "ElectroTos" signal (using the existing digital coax output) and that improved the sound slightly.

An audiophile friend tried the Joplin and was underwhelmed in comparison to his full analog setup. He uses an MC cartridge, and the Joplin may not handle those as well. He's not convinced that the phono "functions" performed in the Joplin (RIAA, gain) are optimal, and I also think he's not convinced by the use of digital for vinyl playback, but the results here depend also on the DAC you use.

However much I enjoy a good LP, my primary listening source is digital. Given how I do enjoy digital and that my amp only has a digital input (!) it makes sense for me to try to "integrate" vinyl in that setup as best I can. So it is something I plan to continue investigating.
 
Last edited:

How do you like this? It's an original mono pressing (but played with stereo cart and phono as I don't have a separate mono rig).
 

How do you like this? It's an original mono pressing (but played with stereo cart and phono as I don't have a separate mono rig).

It sounds nice and relaxing to listen to (through my headphones). A good condition original LP of this album is quite expensive (the price of a mono cart!), but this is one of the rare albums that was also issued in mono on CD:


I like the mono version, and I am sure I would like it even more on vinyl.
 

Red Norvo Plays The Blues


  • Harry Edison - trumpet
  • Ben Webster - tenor saxophone
  • Red Norvo - vibraphone
  • Jimmy Rowles - piano
  • Bob Carter - bass
  • Bill Douglas - drums

I finished rewiring my second speaker, after a month of procrastination. But this track is still in mono (and so is the CD version, which sounds good). The left speaker in the corner of the room does not have the clarity of the right speaker, which is not in a corner. "It is what it is".
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Audiophiles comparing (on another forum) two different versions of linux for their music server (translated from French):

"[version A], gives a very relaxed rendition of the music; a lot of silence and transparency, but perhaps a little too relaxed on the attacks."

"On the other hand [version B - "real time kernel"] gives a much more tonic sound; still as much transparency, but the influence of the reduction in latency is heard."


I am mentally exhausted just trying to understand this!
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile at Jay's Audio Lab: "In today's episode, i take you to a local hardware store to purchase lamp cord so we can use it as speaker cable and compare it to my $100,000 audiophile speaker cables. Sit down and watch!"


You can skip to the cliff hanger at the very end of the video. Warning: it may keep you up at night until part 2.

I've been using basic Teufel speaker cable. It works fine.

Screenshot_20240831-193329.png
 
Last edited:
Here's an interesting video about source material and re-issues:


I was surprised to learn that the last title mentioned, Glass Bead Games by Clifford Jordan, was made from a needle drop, as it does sound very good:


Clifford Jordan fans may be interested in the mosaic box set, which I think were made from the original master tapes:

 
Last edited:
Last edited:
It is interesting to compare recordings of the same song with various speakers over time:


I also included in the playlist the "original" track on YouTube, and Wavetouch Audio's recording, which I like. The recordings are all done with different microphones, sources, etc..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scott Naylor
Concerning that Harry Edison / Ben Webster track I mentioned (and recorded) above, I tried to find vinyl rips and found one on the Internet Archive:


The source seems to be the original 1957 LP. I downloaded the full file - MP3 - it sounds pretty good (better in some ways than the digital versions available today):


Searching for the user name of the person who uploaded this, I found more information here:


The "Jazz Online" site went down after the person who managed it passed away, and this person re-uploaded the 40.000 tracks that were available there.
Here is the site on the wayback machine (without the tracks...): https://web.archive.org/web/20230330101700/http://www.jazz-on-line.com/index.htm
 
Last edited:
Here's something different: ASMR or autonomous sensory meridian response


It seems to be often triggered by soft spoken voices, especially with foreign accents. Here's an amusing example, of a Finnish man producing video game unboxing videos on YouTube:


That youtube channel has many other examples. How about this "Word Chess Championship Between Mongolian and Russian Women"?


From the Wikipedia page: "contemporary composer Holly Herndon released an album called Platform, which included a collaboration with Tolan named "Lonely At The Top", intended to trigger ASMR". Here it is:


I prefer the Finnish unboxing video :)

They also mention the artist Deru:


If you want to fall asleep while listening to audio reviews, I find that the "British Audiophile" has a very relaxing voice (and the content itself may also put you to sleep):


Wavetouch audio (a forum member) also qualifies for ASMR :)


Kudos for the Kris Kristofferson cover at the end of the video.
 
Last edited:

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu