I think the McIntosh gang would like this arm more if there were blue-green LEDs inside the translucent arm tube.??
At this year’s Munich show I had an opportunity to chat with Franc Kuzma while we stood over his Safir 9 arm. I am fascinated with the extremely high effective mass of this arm (5 times the typical effective mass) as much as I am about resonance control of the arm tube. I asked if the high mass was a primary design goal or a result of using sapphire for the arm tube. He replied that it as the later, but he thinks the higher mass is a contributing factor to the great sound of this arm. He referred me to his white paper on his site. He repeated what we’ve said in this forum, that any table used with the Safir 9 must not be loosely sprung and wobbly. This arm is best used on high-mass tables with either no spring suspension or a fairly stiff one.
Regarding resonance control, Franc told me that with the sapphire tube, slightly tapered, the fundamental arm resonance was around 5000 Hz, far higher that in most arms, but with a much lower lower amplitude.
At this year’s Munich show I had an opportunity to chat with Franc Kuzma while we stood over his Safir 9 arm. I am fascinated with the extremely high effective mass of this arm (5 times the typical effective mass) as much as I am about resonance control of the arm tube. I asked if the high mass was a primary design goal or a result of using sapphire for the arm tube. He replied that it as the later, but he thinks the higher mass is a contributing factor to the great sound of this arm. He referred me to his white paper on his site. He repeated what we’ve said in this forum, that any table used with the Safir 9 must not be loosely sprung and wobbly. This arm is best used on high-mass tables with either no spring suspension or a fairly stiff one.
Regarding resonance control, Franc told me that with the sapphire tube, slightly tapered, the fundamental arm resonance was around 5000 Hz, far higher that in most arms, but with a much lower lower amplitude.