His reasoning is mostly flawed and he makes a lot of declarations of fact that I don't believe are actually accepted to be facts. The biggest one is his assumption that .8 degrees of warming is inconsequential. He can't know that and it's certainly not a fact. I'd argue that in a stable ecosystem raising temps can favor certain pathogens that would then decimate their hosts and potentially lead to a chain reaction with the net result being a less complex and lower quality ecosystem. Basically, the butterfly effect. Loss of plants and animals that make human life a richer experience...
This guy would be crushed in a debate, he's not that sharp, and seems biased and emotional.
Oh shit? I can't see the whole article but I'd be shocked if they offered a shred of credible evidence to back up the claims. It's all the same tired propaganda. Zzzzz.
Your comment perfectly sums up the head in the sand climate change denial movement. 'I can't (won't) read the article, but it's doesn't matter what they say or what data they provide.'
The Trump organization deleting all of the climate change data from the NASA, EPA and NOHA websites should tell any rational person what they need to know: climate change is real but it's bad for business.
Your comment perfectly sums up the head in the sand climate change denial movement. 'I can't (won't) read the article, but it's doesn't matter what they say or what data they provide.'
The Trump organization deleting all of the climate change data from the NASA, EPA and NOHA websites should tell any rational person what they need to know: climate change is real but it's bad for business.
RIP mankind.12 years left for mankind!!! (reduced to 8-9 years per Bernie and Tom at the last debate).
Can someone tell me how to address a political issue without politics?
Main problem today is pollution and the fact there are too many people on the earth, not CO2.
We have a winner. Far too many people on this planet.
PURE POLITICS HERE!!! PLEASE STOP!!!
We have a winner. Far too many people on this planet.
Agreed. They will be eventually culled by wars or famine or disease. Climate Change will help with that. Humans are too greedy to do what is good for humans, like develop new vaccines for new bacteria threats.
I think if we eliminated all violent criminals worldwide that would be of more benefit than driving Tesla cars.
We can’t do that though because many people believe all human life is precious.
Have you ever heard of redemption, personal betterment, rehabilitation in society? Israelis aim their prison system to do that, and it seems to work.
Sure, sometimes there is no choice but to kill terrorists, or more specifically terrorist leaders, but these are an exceedingly small percentage of all violent persons.
Yes it is.
And anyway, who are you to determine which life is precious and which is not?