Ron's Speaker, Turntable, Power and Room Treatment Upgrades

. . . curiously it was the type of music that sounded great on the VTLs and made me hesitate on the Lamm's. Saying it in short - sometimes I feel music needs more beauty than emotion.

. . .

Francisco,

This is very interesting, but I am not sure I am understanding you. Without thinking about it too deeply I would have thought sonic beauty equals sonic emotion; I would have thought SETs generate both beauty and emotion (I would have thought “beauty” and “emotion” are in the same direction).

Please help me understand. In what ways did the VTLs generate more beauty but less emotion, and in what ways did the Lamms generate more emotion than beauty?
 
I have to agree with your thoughts Ron as those amps do all of those things for me in my system. Too bad those amps haven’t found a permanent home yet. As I said, for that price IMO those amps are a steal and should be a permanent part of someone’s system.

Where’s Jeffrey_T ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Resnick
My personal musical preference of focusing intently on the few classical pieces and the few jazz pieces and the somewhat larger number of pop and rock pieces I really love seems to be more unusual than I suspected (given the number of people who have with all good and kind and genuine intentions gently patted me on the head suggesting that I will in due time appreciate a broader range of musical interests). There certainly is a world of music out there to love, it is just that if I don’t like a new piece better than an existing piece that new piece simply is not going into rotation or into the collection. This is just the way I work on this subject. For whatever reason I only like the few pieces and tracks I really love.

So the whole purpose for me of this hobby and this listening room project and the new stereo components project and all this time and expense and brain damage is to enable me to play at the top tier of realism and authenticity and fidelity these very few classical and jazz and pop/rock pieces I happen to really love.

I got into tape in a narrow but pretty deep way for the sole purpose of being able to reproduce these favorite few tracks in, arguably, the highest fidelity audio format available. It is all about these 20 or 30 tracks that, for whatever reason, really speak to me or really engage me emotionally.

I don’t think about having the stereo to play a world of music. I literally specifically and conscientiously think about having the stereo to play Stevie Nicks’ “Landslide” and Jeff Buckley’s “Hallelujah”and Mozart’s Symphony 41 and Dave Brubeck’s Time Out, and Sarah McLachlan’s Freedom Sessions’ “Hold On,” etc.

One of my very favorites — near the very top of my list — is “Send in the Clowns" by Bill Henderson, Live at the Times (Jazz Planet Records/Classic Records). This is a track I have always used as a test track, and it is one of my very favorite recordings of all time. Literally everybody in this hobby who has met me in real life me has heard me play this track for them.

I am happy to report that I now have one of likely only two safety copies in the world of this Bill Henderson track. (Of course whomever Classic Records licensed the master tape from has the master tape). It is not too fine a point, it is not an exaggeration, to say that the entire purpose of my stereo project in general, and my tape project in particular, is to enable me to play this track on tape. If my system and tape playback in my system enables me to listen to this track in a transcendental way, then I will consider all of it to have been worth it.

I truly cannot wait to hear this track on tape!

Ron
I believe you and I are more alike than not on this subject. I am the same way about Steely Dan's Aja, the title track.
Not to long ago I went off the deep end acquiring new music at an alarming rate both digital and analog or combinations of both. Then one day I noticed while I enjoy discovering new music there is a very small core that I keep returning to.
So I stopped buying stupid amounts of vinyl. With Tidal/Spotify/Pandora and even You Tube there is so much on tap to figure it out before purchasing.
So with me if Aja is right I am a happy camper, over and over again.

Brothers in Arms and The mans Too Strong are all also in this small group of miracle workers for me.

Congratulations on your new acquisition, I am sure you will smile big when the reels start spinning!

P.S. My back is still pissed about all the vinyl I humped from WA to AZ. I still have to hump it one more time from the climate controlled storage to our new home as soon as we find it! I parted ways with hundreds of pounds of vinyl this move.
 
Last edited:
Ron
I believe you and I are more alike than not on this subject. I am the same way about Steely Dan's Aja, the title track.
Not to long ago I went off the deep end acquiring new music at an alarming rate both digital and analog or combinations of both. Then one day I noticed while I enjoy discovering new music there is a very small core that I keep returning to.
So I stopped buying stupid amounts of vinyl. With Tidal/Spotify/Pandora and even You Tube there is so much on tap to figure it out before purchasing.
So with me if Aja is right I am a happy camper, over and over again.

Brothers in Arms and The mans Too Strong are all also in this small group of miracle workers for me.

Congratulations on your new acquisition, I am sure you will smile big when the reels start spinning!

P.S. My back is still pissed about all the vinyl I humped from WA to AZ. I still have to hump it one more time from the climate controlled storage to our new home as soon as we find it! I parted ways with hundreds of pounds of vinyl this move.

Mike

I loved listening to Aja ilisteningn vinyl when you visited. You and I are of the same ilk
 
Thank you for your reply, but I might have been unclear in my question. I’m not asking about combining ported midrange drivers and ported bass drivers. I’m asking about combining ported woofers in the big Wilson speakers going down to 20 or 25 Hz with ported subwoofers going even below that frequency range.

From the point of your comment a few posts up about ported drivers emitting a direct wave and a slightly delayed wave, doesn’t combining ported woofers with ported subwoofers effectively create four slightly different versions of those low frequencies?

Ron, you have it correct that you create multiple sources. But what isn't true is the belief that all the audiophiles are into, in that it matters at all for fidelity. That is simply wrong, the wavelengths are extensively too long for it to matter. The human ear will never hear the difference in timing. If it could, then having two bass drivers would be just as bad as a port, for fidelity. In fact having anything besides a single driver would be, and even that would be limited to a handful of frequencies to prevent this small difference. What I'm getting at is that it's not a concern. Everyone's belief in timing and such that people keep going over is mumbo-jumbo in the bass region and absolutely irrelevant. We're talking parallel to flat earthing. In fact if you want to have a matched impulse response you need to move the subwoofer closer to you, not near mains. But as I've been saying, you're not going to hear it because it's dominated by every other factor. It's dominated by the fact that all the cues for low bass comes from much higher frequencies.

But what Gary and I have been saying is that while a port is not a problem, it often has a different character than sealed. The Q of the subwoofer will affect this, and so will the tuning frequency. Ported typically have a lower Q, btw. I'm probably less opposed to mixing ported with sealed than Gary happens to be. Personally I think it can be done with some subwoofers - you may also want the option of being able to plug the port on some. What I really don't like is that ported boxes are much larger (than DSP sealed).

Why do you want even bass response? Because that's what makes bass sound articulate, and prevents a boomy sound. It will sound natural when it doesn't transition from wimper to whomp constantly.

So let's get back to why I wouldn't recommend two more towers. Here's a look at your room.

ronroom.png

As you can see your primary concern modes are in the 20hz region. This exactly where you have to cross the subwoofers with the bass towers. Having the towers positioned on each side, like the bass towers, will only serve to strengthen these resonances (modes). They're simply too long of frequencies to offset the subwoofers enough on that side of the room behind or near the Pendragons with a stereo configuration.

Now if you use a swarm style setup you could have one subwoofer in the middle, near the front wall. It won't be perfect, but it'll be better. Then placing another 3 subs around the room will help prevent you from building stronger modes & nodes, and allow integration. Why is that important? Well, because the odds that you have modes & nodes in the listening position are fairly probable - well, expected. With towers you'll end up having to turn the volume up to get what you want on one album, and then down on another.

There's a secondary reason for why a swarm will work as opposed to towers. That's because the openings in your rooms will create more modes below 23hz as lower frequency waves go through them, as those sub 20hz frequencies see a much larger room. So as you develop modes and nodes under 20hz because of the extended room boundaries in the openings, you'll have some more modes & nodes in the listening area. A swarm will smooth out the bass as you find the optimal setup with it, where as the towers will fight you.

If you did not have openings in the room you'd be able to cross in the 20hz region without the consequences being too bad, by having the subwoofer behind you most likely to try and land it between modes & nodes of the Pendragon's bass towers. That single subwoofer would just need to be very powerful and play low. It would work ok because the smaller a room gets the higher the starting frequency of modes will be - so that under 20hz wouldn't have modes and a subwoofer would simply act like an omni directional device. Well, that's the idea, it may not be absolutely perfect but it does work well if the situation presents itself.

I'm going to post some thoughts on subwoofer selection in a minute here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Resnick
Francisco,

This is very interesting, but I am not sure I am understanding you. Without thinking about it too deeply I would have thought sonic beauty equals sonic emotion; I would have thought SETs generate both beauty and emotion (I would have thought “beauty” and “emotion” are in the same direction).

Please help me understand. In what ways did the VTLs generate more beauty but less emotion, and in what ways did the Lamms generate more emotion than beauty?

very much like the Lamm's and big VAC's in my system, the VAC's would be under control and sweet, but lacking the emotional spell binding allure of the ML3's.

the tease verses the deed. :)

your mind admired and examined the VAC view, the Lamm swept you off your feet. no pin counting with the Lamm's. just sighs and grunts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Resnick
One of the hardest tasks in audio is getting subwoofers chosen and integrated. One of my four subwoofs just blew up. I replaced it with a 23 year old M&K MX200, which sits right next to my seating position and seems to work perfectly and looks mint. It is so tight and transient, I can hear all the little bass fibrillations around the tones, not just the major volume/ octave shifts, I'm impressed.
My subwoof that blew was a class D and 15 inch woofer with passive, and the amp blew and took out the speaker element as well. I think I will only get class AB or B subwoof amp types in the future. I don't think I trust class D, having had two that have blown so far. My class AB/B subwoofs seem more resilient and longer lasting.
 
Folsom,

Thank you for your further explanation and for the acoustic analysis work!!!

“What I really don't like is that ported boxes are much larger (than DSP sealed).” But this is just a space preference and a technology preference.

I have been trying to understand why Gary believes that attempting to integrate ported Subsonics with sealed Gryphon woofer towers is doomed to failure.
 
Last edited:
Doomed to failure might be a bit stronger than truly believed.

Space starts to count when you've got things like 12 foot cubic boxes. I still plan to post more, just been a little busy.
 
Doomed to failure might be a bit stronger than truly believed.

Space starts to count when you've got things like 12 foot cubic boxes. I still plan to post more, just been a little busy.

If not “doomed to failure” then maybe “a more difficult path than typically undertaken”?
 
So maybe I should buy a swarm of Wilson Audio Subsonics? Instead of an ASC Tube Trap in each corner I could put a Subsonic in each corner. (But there would be no place left to sit down!)

Can you imagine how great four Thor’s Hammers or four Subsonics would be for a home theater set-up playing submarine movies!
 
I believe a large listening area that opens to a even larger space is advantageous to intergrating multiple type subs. I use a ported and sealed type. If my room was closed, I think they probably would not work as well.

My satellites are down to 40hz. I cross the ported dual sub at 60 hz and the Velodyne at 80 hz

Home theater is a whole different ball game. This will be a challenge :)
 

Attachments

  • DF79C067-195D-4F2A-BD75-FBB0EF76398E.jpeg
    DF79C067-195D-4F2A-BD75-FBB0EF76398E.jpeg
    907.2 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:
So maybe I should buy a swarm of Wilson Audio Subsonics? Instead of an ASC Tube Trap in each corner I could put a Subsonic in each corner. (But there would be no place left to sit down!)

Can you imagine how great four Thor’s Hammers or four Subsonics would be for a home theater set-up playing submarine movies!

It's funny you say that. I've been running through scenarios that would work. And I cannot deny that the possibility of using Wilson subwoofers might make sense. That doesn't mean I am set on them as a solution. They're actually complicated to use in a swarm because they have such flat output that they don't want to be near walls... so you get the conundrum of crowding yourself out of the room. I had thought one thor/subsonic behind the listening area on it's side/back might actually solve all you need for subwoofer concerns. However, that is a little bit of a gamble, and I cannot tell you that you wouldn't hear the port noise having it there, that close. The reason it would make some sense is that it wouldn't be near the mains so it would help even out the bass a bit more, and everything below 23hz would be more omni, and more even. But as discussed earlier I can't guarantee that you won't see modes below 23hz because of the openings in the room.

There is no passive sealed unit that plays down to 10hz that I can find, even at -6db, all on their own. In order to get there a larger box helps, and a speaker driver with an FS (self resonate frequency) that's closer to 10hz. Although saying this I've just come up with a concept for a subwoofer that isn't ported and could perhaps reach 10hz, and not take up too much space... to be used in a swarm. (concept) But not all is lost on that situation because subwoofers can be EQ'd without DSP to reach deeper. The Stenheim would be great, but it isn't passive... their site is confusing.

One way to help have gain is to place the subwoofer near the wall, facing it. This gives you around 3 db per octave gain. This only works well when the box is tuned for a roll off, or is crossed over somewhere near where it begins to roll off. The swarm from Audio Kensis does just that, but it doesn't play to 10hz (it can go to 18hz ported, no problem).

It's somewhat worth asking about the difference in value below 18hz, vs the quality in the 20-30hz. Tower speakers themselves may not have great bass just due to the room, in the lower regions that they do play, with the restrictions of placement. So how often are you buying a subwoofer to fill what you should already have as compared to extending the range for new frequencies?

I want to be clear I have 100% zero objection to DSP subwoofers myself. But I respect you want to hold true to trying something different that follows an approach throughout your whole stereo. I don't believe for a second you could actually hear the difference. The primary problem with DSP classD subwoofers is the noise they may add back into the system due to the amps themselves (not true of all classD amps). I believe someone else on the forum is about to test a way to remove that problem. If we can get a conclusion on that working out, maybe it'll settle discussion on whether or not seeking non-class D, non DSP, is the answer.

Until then I think the Wilson WatchDog controller looks to be like the tool to have to integrate subwoofers. I'm looking into possible subwoofer matches that are sealed, and that could be integrated in such a way that they'll play below 20hz with good output, but not "flat".

Would you be willing to order a custom subwoofer from a manufacturer that doesn't have to do any guess work? (ok, multiple custom subwoofers)
 
It's funny you say that. I've been running through scenarios that would work. And I cannot deny that the possibility of using Wilson subwoofers might make sense. That doesn't mean I am set on them as a solution. They're actually complicated to use in a swarm because they have such flat output that they don't want to be near walls... so you get the conundrum of crowding yourself out of the room. I had thought one thor/subsonic behind the listening area on it's side/back might actually solve all you need for subwoofer concerns. However, that is a little bit of a gamble, and I cannot tell you that you wouldn't hear the port noise having it there, that close. The reason it would make some sense is that it wouldn't be near the mains so it would help even out the bass a bit more, and everything below 23hz would be more omni, and more even. But as discussed earlier I can't guarantee that you won't see modes below 23hz because of the openings in the room.

There is no passive sealed unit that plays down to 10hz that I can find, even at -6db, all on their own. In order to get there a larger box helps, and a speaker driver with an FS (self resonate frequency) that's closer to 10hz. Although saying this I've just come up with a concept for a subwoofer that isn't ported and could perhaps reach 10hz, and not take up too much space... to be used in a swarm. (concept) But not all is lost on that situation because subwoofers can be EQ'd without DSP to reach deeper. The Stenheim would be great, but it isn't passive... their site is confusing.

One way to help have gain is to place the subwoofer near the wall, facing it. This gives you around 3 db per octave gain. This only works well when the box is tuned for a roll off, or is crossed over somewhere near where it begins to roll off. The swarm from Audio Kensis does just that, but it doesn't play to 10hz (it can go to 18hz ported, no problem).

It's somewhat worth asking about the difference in value below 18hz, vs the quality in the 20-30hz. Tower speakers themselves may not have great bass just due to the room, in the lower regions that they do play, with the restrictions of placement. So how often are you buying a subwoofer to fill what you should already have as compared to extending the range for new frequencies?

I want to be clear I have 100% zero objection to DSP subwoofers myself. But I respect you want to hold true to trying something different that follows an approach throughout your whole stereo. I don't believe for a second you could actually hear the difference. The primary problem with DSP classD subwoofers is the noise they may add back into the system due to the amps themselves (not true of all classD amps). I believe someone else on the forum is about to test a way to remove that problem. If we can get a conclusion on that working out, maybe it'll settle discussion on whether or not seeking non-class D, non DSP, is the answer.

Until then I think the Wilson WatchDog controller looks to be like the tool to have to integrate subwoofers. I'm looking into possible subwoofer matches that are sealed, and that could be integrated in such a way that they'll play below 20hz with good output, but not "flat".

Would you be willing to order a custom subwoofer from a manufacturer that doesn't have to do any guess work? (ok, multiple custom subwoofers)
There is always room gain to help sealed subwoofers ;)
 
There is always room gain to help sealed subwoofers ;)

Yes, but this room isn’t small, and has openings. So if the right sealed ones can be found then it may be possible to set them up with room gain in mind.
 
It's funny you say that. I've been running through scenarios that would work. And I cannot deny that the possibility of using Wilson subwoofers might make sense. That doesn't mean I am set on them as a solution. They're actually complicated to use in a swarm because they have such flat output that they don't want to be near walls... so you get the conundrum of crowding yourself out of the room. I had thought one thor/subsonic behind the listening area on it's side/back might actually solve all you need for subwoofer concerns. However, that is a little bit of a gamble, and I cannot tell you that you wouldn't hear the port noise having it there, that close. The reason it would make some sense is that it wouldn't be near the mains so it would help even out the bass a bit more, and everything below 23hz would be more omni, and more even. But as discussed earlier I can't guarantee that you won't see modes below 23hz because of the openings in the room.

There is no passive sealed unit that plays down to 10hz that I can find, even at -6db, all on their own. In order to get there a larger box helps, and a speaker driver with an FS (self resonate frequency) that's closer to 10hz. Although saying this I've just come up with a concept for a subwoofer that isn't ported and could perhaps reach 10hz, and not take up too much space... to be used in a swarm. (concept) But not all is lost on that situation because subwoofers can be EQ'd without DSP to reach deeper. The Stenheim would be great, but it isn't passive... their site is confusing.

One way to help have gain is to place the subwoofer near the wall, facing it. This gives you around 3 db per octave gain. This only works well when the box is tuned for a roll off, or is crossed over somewhere near where it begins to roll off. The swarm from Audio Kensis does just that, but it doesn't play to 10hz (it can go to 18hz ported, no problem).

It's somewhat worth asking about the difference in value below 18hz, vs the quality in the 20-30hz. Tower speakers themselves may not have great bass just due to the room, in the lower regions that they do play, with the restrictions of placement. So how often are you buying a subwoofer to fill what you should already have as compared to extending the range for new frequencies?

I want to be clear I have 100% zero objection to DSP subwoofers myself. But I respect you want to hold true to trying something different that follows an approach throughout your whole stereo. I don't believe for a second you could actually hear the difference. The primary problem with DSP classD subwoofers is the noise they may add back into the system due to the amps themselves (not true of all classD amps). I believe someone else on the forum is about to test a way to remove that problem. If we can get a conclusion on that working out, maybe it'll settle discussion on whether or not seeking non-class D, non DSP, is the answer.

Until then I think the Wilson WatchDog controller looks to be like the tool to have to integrate subwoofers. I'm looking into possible subwoofer matches that are sealed, and that could be integrated in such a way that they'll play below 20hz with good output, but not "flat".

Would you be willing to order a custom subwoofer from a manufacturer that doesn't have to do any guess work? (ok, multiple custom subwoofers)
 
Maybe they are designed to be? I'm going to ask Wilson... Their -3db at 10hz seems unrealistic without the controller or room reinforcement.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu