A valid comparison like this is impossible if one wants to maintain any semblance of intellectual honesty about it.
Who said audiophile comparisons are valid?
A valid comparison like this is impossible if one wants to maintain any semblance of intellectual honesty about it.
A valid comparison like this is impossible if one wants to maintain any semblance of intellectual honesty about it.
Are you stating that Michael Fremer and Jason Heilbrunn lack any semblance of intellectual honesty?
. . . ?
. . .
. . . comparing the SAT and AFO under the same conditions?
. . .
Both these gentlemen stated in writing that the AFO waa the best sounding turntable that they ever heard. This after an afternoon session at the Audion Salon.
. . .
It is a reflection of the carbon fiber weave to light at certain angle. The original model has very little or none of that.Here she is again. For some peculiar reason the focus fell on the arm finish, apparently someone forgot to put their white gloves on
I do not consider two different turntables with different tonearms and different vinyl records heard weeks apart to be the "same conditions" or to qualify as a direct and valid comparison.
Why will it be different records? Isn't it Fremer demonstrating this one as well, so he will get to choose his records like he did with the AF0?
A valid comparison like this is impossible if one wants to maintain any semblance of intellectual honesty about it.
I do not consider two different turntables with different tonearms and different vinyl records heard weeks apart to be the "same conditions" or to qualify as a direct and valid comparison.
And the same SAT tonearm and the same Lyra Atlas cartridge.
It will be interesting if they dare compare as according to Ron
Btw Ked, how do you compare all the different systems you have heard and maintain your intellectual honesty?
Not even Sherlock Holmes himself could find in my post any reference to Michael Fremer or Jason (sic) Heilbrunn. I have no idea what you are referring to. So, no, obviously and of course I am not stating any such thing.
I do not know Jacob myself, but I know that he has a sterling reputation and I have friends who hold Jacob in high regard. I know myself that Michael is extremely intellectually honest.
Generally a guy like Fremer playing with SAT arm and Lyra which is his stock, with his own recordings, will get quickly to the bottom of if one of these tables has any shortcomings. Only if they are both excellent and at a similar level will he need to spend more time with both in the same system swapping around.
Edit: don't know if he used SAT and Lyra on AF0, if not, he will at least know how it SAT DD compares to technics and continuum.
Ked. Yes he did. That is why I mentioned it and why it will be quite easy for Fremer to have a handle of both tables. Same with JH.
https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/techdas-air-force-zero-turntable-preview/
What if "one of the million dollar system I would not take home for free. Too much space for so much noise"This million $ system is so much better than that million $ system. "And their was much rejoicing...yay"
Why will it be different records? Isn't it Fremer demonstrating this one as well, so he will get to choose his records like he did with the AF0?