Sealed Loudspeakers and Ported Subwoofers?

sbo6

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2014
938
84
85
Round Rock, TX
It absolutely does NOT show that.

His own graphs show significantly less excursion around the tuning frequency. At same SPL, which is most important, the differences are larger.
Yes but only at the tuned port frequency which = ~35 - 20Hz. Where is most musical bass at?
 

DaveC

Industry Expert
Nov 16, 2014
2,975
834
180
Total excursion would be the area under the graph, if you start at the tuning frequency and go up to say ~200 Hz you'll get the total excursion of the driver at those frequencies. Or you can restrict the signal in to the frequencies of interest, but the graphs Rob posted are misleading because they are zoomed way out and signal is shown down to 5 Hz when the tuning frequency looks to be just under 30 Hz. If you zoomed in on the the 25-100 Hz range you get a much clearer picture, but Rob didn't do that...

In any case, it's obvious from the graphs that excursion of the BR woofer is MUCH lower around the port tuning frequency and the resulting FR graph shows a large increase in bass extension and efficiency, which is exactly what you'd expect.

IMO Rob's argument is completely a semantic interpretation of the data and serves no useful purpose. Anyone can look at the graphs he posted, it supports everything I said, which btw does NOT include saying it's definitely going to cause any damage to plug a port! The tradeoff is lower efficiency and increased IMD due to higher excursion.
 

sbo6

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2014
938
84
85
Round Rock, TX
I'm missing something. On the graphs at any power level, the slopes are easily visible so what does zooming in do? Also, the worse case scenario at 100 watts shows a cone displacement delta (sealed vs. ported) at ~28Hz which = 3.8mm or < 1/8". And that's at 98+DB! So in his simulation while the output is less by ~8DB for the sealed, that's the largest delta, and at 28Hz (little musical information). What would be interesting as I think you said earlier would be to simulate and graph SPL versus excursion for both.
 

Robh3606

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,042
57
145
Destiny
Morning Dave

You need same SPL, not the same power input.

BR isn't used below tuning frequency.
No you don't not to make the point I was which was that a change of alignment would damage a driver at 10-25 watt power levels.

If you did the same SPL you would have to EQ the sealed box which was not part of the original comparison and would obviously increase excursion in a sealed design.

As far as BR not being used below tuning well that's a bit of a stretch. Smaller reflex boxes especially the smaller stand mounts, say with 6" woofers, are used full range by many people. Not everyone uses subwoofers.

The whole "premise" you completely took out of context. You're basically trying to argue a BR isn't more effecient vs a sealed design, and you're just wrong.
Bellow is my post before we had a disagreement discussing why you could save money compared to a sealed design. Post 52 this thread


Well actually it's not. It depends on how you look at it. For that same FR over the same bandwidth you get more bang for your buck using reflex enclosures. You don't have to waste amplifier power making up for the sealed subwoofers roll-off. You can also use a driver that doesn't have to put up with up to 12db of EQ so less expense there as well. So you are actually are using the bass drivers more efficiently using reflex enclosures.


But hey, rig the results just to make a point and try to make yourself look better. Your behavior is ridiculous. None of this is up for debate, if you don't understand the basics this isn't the place to argue it anyways, I'm not interested and don't want to spend the time or effort on this ridiculousness.
I never rig my results and will admit when I am wrong or have misspoken.

Rob :)
 

Robh3606

Well-Known Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,042
57
145
Destiny
What would be interesting as I think you said earlier would be to simulate and graph SPL versus excursion for both.
Hello sbo6

It is already there?? You have excursion and SPL graphed over frequency at 4 power levels.

Are you talking about with EQ? If you are the sealed box is going to have an issue with excursion and potentially power as well. No free lunch.

Rob :)
 

DaveC

Industry Expert
Nov 16, 2014
2,975
834
180
Lol, Rob. Your sig says it all.

I'm just NOT up for it, your argument is ridiculous. Buh-bye now!
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high-end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. A place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss existing and new audio products, music servers, music streamers and computer audio, digital to audio converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel to reel, speakers, headphones, tube amplifiers and solid state amplification. Founded in 2010 What's Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing