If you look back through the nostalgia haze of prior decades, you'll find a whole heap load of crud then too. There is a lot of great music produced today-- just not in the mainstream (as it's always been).
Very true. On both counts.
If you look back through the nostalgia haze of prior decades, you'll find a whole heap load of crud then too. There is a lot of great music produced today-- just not in the mainstream (as it's always been).
+1 the mediums are no longer the issue if music is actually the focus. When sound is the focus the mediums become a clear issue of preference.
Some people are into sound... so some people are then into analogue... and some people are into digital... and then some are just into music. It’s always fairly easy to see who are who in this. None of this is good or bad, it’s just preference.
Uhmmm, I’m not even sure I understand what you mean Brad .Umm...I don't really agree with this or else there would be no point for anything beyond the bare minimum to hear clearly the music. The pursuit of the "best" you can is that one hopes to achieve a closer connection to music with improved sound quality. Thus the drive for ever higher resolution media and equipment. Of course the two (musical enjoyment and audio resolution ) do not go hand in hand like one would hope and it can even regress the enjoyment if certain subtle distortions that are dissonant to human hearing despite higher objective and subjective resolution.
Uhmmm, I’m not even sure I understand what you mean Brad .
I do believe that there is specific focus for some along specific gear formats but I believe this is purely a sonic determination. There is a tipping point into musical happiness that is possible with all the formats.
I’m not saying a crap system is sufficient. I’m just saying that sometimes we are making choices based upon sound and at times we are making determinations based upon musical connection. This is a moving target. These things can be enmeshed but not in a linear way. But yes, we are in phases of development and nothing is static. It’s about shifting priorities.
My current focus and primary determinant is in musical connection. It may change but I doubt it... I may just be too old to go back for another round lol
And talking about musical connection, you also have to look at what is even available in which format. I happen to have listened this past weekend to a bunch of music that simply is not available on vinyl, and not in so called "high-res" format either. It was all in high resolution Redbook digital. And I tremendously enjoyed it.
That solves the format issue for you right there. You can't make a musical connection in other formats to music that is not available in those formats.
Uhmmm, I’m not even sure I understand what you mean Brad .
I do believe that there is specific focus for some along specific gear formats but I believe this is purely a sonic determination. There is a tipping point into musical happiness that is possible with all the formats.
I’m not saying a crap system is sufficient. I’m just saying that sometimes we are making choices based upon sound and at times we are making determinations based upon musical connection. This is a moving target. These things can be enmeshed but not in a linear way. But yes, we are in phases of development and nothing is static. It’s about shifting priorities.
My current focus and primary determinant is in musical connection. It may change but I doubt it... I may just be too old to go back for another round lol
I’m like you Al in that (pre current disruption) I listened fairly regularly to both high quality analogue (in friend‘s systems) and digital and in terms of musical enjoyment I don’t see a lack of engagement at all in either if the systems are disposed to making great musical connection. When we’re listening to great music the focus of appreciation is essentially the music.And talking about musical connection, you also have to look at what is even available in which format. I happen to have listened this past weekend to a bunch of music that simply is not available on vinyl, and not in so called "high-res" format either. It was all in high resolution Redbook digital. And I tremendously enjoyed it.
That solves the format issue for you right there. You can't make a musical connection in other formats to music that is not available in those formats.
Personally, my buying decisions are based on this. Those who, like me, are primarily listening to classical music (even if not exclusively), including historical, won't be satisfied listening to a limited selection of audiophile recordings on a system that excels at playing back audiophile recordings at the cost of 99% of available music. Not long ago, at an audiophile acquaintance's house, I asked him to put on a historical recording as we were discussing interpretive tendencies - within a minute or so, he turned it off saying "I can't listen to that", and he wasn't referring to the music-making, but the fact that the historical recording sounded pretty vile on his very nice system (horns, tubes, sounds great as long as the recording quality is up there). I personally wouldn't want a system that dictates what I can or cannot listen to. Lots of music I like may never become available in any high-resolution format - in fact, there's some I had to wait for for years to make its way to RBCD, where I may not live to hear the same recording in another remastering, good or bad.
Greetings from Switzerland, David.
I genuinely didn’t get your original comment but that’s just my lack of comprehension on it Brad. But I wasn’t saying that people concerned with gear (I include myself here as a person with some good gear) don’t then necessarily care about music, just that it’s about priorities in determining whether a system works or not... for me musical connection is the primary and then summative review point.Actually, based on your response it seems you did understand me..
The people that I know who really only care about music are perfectly fine with what we would consider "crap" systems (including all manner of blue tooth "pills" , giveaway earbuds etc.) and this includes professional musicians in some cases. But to say that people concerned with gear are not as concerned with music but only how it "sounds" is not necessarily true or fair to those of us who really care about both (I see no reason why there needs to be any kind of mutual exclusivity in the two desires.) Some people don't need much resolution or high fidelity in order to get pleasure and meaning in music and some need to have it as close to "real" as we can in order to evoke the same emotional responses as live. Some people don't get any emotional response from live and only in their hyper resolved hifi (this group MIGHT be more concerned with gear and how it sounds )
The sound quality of the recording should be noticeable but not necessarily unlistenable...of course everyone's threshold on this is different. I personally could listen all day to 78s on Grammophone (although those things are quite loud) because I am fascinated with the performances of the time but I know some who would never consider it because the sound is too "low-fi". In some respects it is (noise, bandwidth, tonal coloration) but in two important ways they are superb (dynamics in the mid band and immediacy). That said, I prefer a good live recording to give me the "I am there" feeling of a great performance.
We all wish our favorite music were available in great sound. In the meantime, I'll keep listening to my favorite music using gear that does a variety of recordings well (enough).
I may have told this story before, but I was once invited to a self-proclaimed audiophile's home who had all the latest "reference" components as reviewed by German magazines (you know which), and who literally owned only one audiophile test CD (that he probably got along with one of those magazine numbers). I distinctly remember the track of a Diesel train passing by, which was admittedly impressive. When I asked if he had any music, he went off and came back with his trophy wife's aerobic music CD.
Greetings from Switzerland, David.
(...) I distinctly remember the track of a Diesel train passing by, which was admittedly impressive.(...)
Thanks AlI never took the statement "we are living in the golden age of audio" to mean "this is the best we can achieve", but rather "this is the best we've ever had it". And I also don't see it limited to DACs, but extended to amplification, speakers etc.
As I have made clear , I wholeheartedly agree with the statement.
We all wish our favorite music were available in great sound.
I genuinely didn’t get your original comment but that’s just my lack of comprehension on it Brad. But I wasn’t saying that people concerned with gear (I include myself here as a person with some good gear) don’t then necessarily care about music, just that it’s about priorities in determining whether a system works or not... for me musical connection is the primary and then summative review point.
Some people love gear that isn’t strong at musical connection but great in sonic appreciation. These things aren’t mutually inclusive or mutually exclusive. It’s just about individual goals and priorities.
I’d happily put my system up against yours in terms of either. My system does both sonics and musical connection, and these things are interconnected (but not proportionately so) and that what makes my system good for me is primarily that it sounds great but that it connects me to music better than anything. Some have sonic criteria as their primary goal... it’s all good but I struggle to stay enchanted with systems that can’t connect to music with a degree of immediacy simply because music is the alpha and the omega for me. We all have our own philosophies in system design, no harm in any of it.
We all wish our favorite music were available in great sound. In the meantime, I'll keep listening to my favorite music using gear that does a variety of recordings well (enough).
I may have told this story before, but I was once invited to a self-proclaimed audiophile's home who had all the latest "reference" components as reviewed by German magazines (you know which), and who literally owned only one audiophile test CD (that he probably got along with one of those magazine numbers). I distinctly remember the track of a Diesel train passing by, which was admittedly impressive. When I asked if he had any music, he went off and came back with his trophy wife's aerobic music CD.
Greetings from Switzerland, David.
I personally could listen all day to 78s on Grammophone (although those things are quite loud) because I am fascinated with the performances of the time but I know some who would never consider it because the sound is too "low-fi".
My systems cover a wide range as well without falling down on lesser recordings. I was listening to Moodog (Classical/Jazz), Beethoven piano Sonatas and Tool all in the same listening session!
Well, I have more music than I can probably listen to in this lifetime if I did an album a day (which I don't have time to do anymore) then I would still take 5-6 years to get through all the music...and that is not counting the streaming that is literally limitless!
What I do now if find music I really like on streaming and see if I can get it on LP. Two recent ones was Blue Maqams (Euro/middle eastern Jazz on ECM. From 2017 and already considered one of the great ECM releases) and Kind of Spain on ACT label by Wolfgang Haffner. Oh and Nik Baertsch Awase (2018) also on ECM...great music and great sound. I managed to get them all on LP and despite the fact that they are all most certainly recorded on digital the final sounds awesome and moving just that little bit more than the digital.
(...) What I do now if find music I really like on streaming and see if I can get it on LP. Two recent ones was Blue Maqams (Euro/middle eastern Jazz on ECM. From 2017 and already considered one of the great ECM releases) and Kind of Spain on ACT label by Wolfgang Haffner. Oh and Nik Baertsch Awase (2018) also on ECM...great music and great sound. I managed to get them all on LP and despite the fact that they are all most certainly recorded on digital the final sounds awesome and moving just that little bit more than the digital.
Makes great sense to me. It is, however, the reason I do not use streaming - I'm wondering at times if I'll ever manage to listen to all the music I have in form of files? David.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |