That's why most of my equipment reviews are of the more metropolitan-sized components that I can move in and out of the listening room easily. The bigger ones take longer to deal with. I run two listening rooms (one in my home in London and one in the office in Sandleheath) and the office one is larger and allows products to stay in situ for longer. This became intensely problematic during the COVID-19 lockdowns, however.Yes, thank you for participating. I am glad you are on the mend, and wish you a speedy recovery. As I mentioned, I think you are a very good author and write well and are no doubt capable of writing profusely each month. What I question is the experimentation, listening time and overall time spent with each product when doing ten reviews a month. The writing quality is Not an issue, the review process is. How do you move so many products in and out of your listening room? Or, as I suspect, these arent in-house reviews but rather day trips to dealers or something else? Personalily, i dont think i understand a component until it has sat in the system a long time. Amd that implies i understand the rest of the system, the room and the music…. That said, even if I did understand, I couldn’t write as well as you.
Tests based on go-sees are rare, and marked as such in print (as will be the case with an upcoming look at the MBL 101-Xtreme... none of our UK-based reviewers have a room large enough to house them anymore). Any such test ideally requires known equipment to benchmark and either prior knowledge of the room or some time to 'read' the room acoustics first. These go-sees became more common during 2020/21 with manufacturers and distributors in the UK citing 'COVID-19' and 'Brexit' as reasons why reviewers didn't get products for lengthy listening sessions, but we have collectively nixed the concept.
My audio listening training from the outset was based on a fast initial assessment followed by longer listening sessions. My time at Grahams Hi-Fi and especially the discipline honed by years of blind tests at Hi-Fi Choice were both reliant on conclusions drawn at a pace far faster than my current work; we would routinely test a dozen products in a single day.
The record was blind testing 180 cables (IIRC) in just under three days. That needed some decompress time and I would never do it again.
I don't work to anything that pace anymore, but those skills do allow for swift assessment.