Visit to Henk van der Hoeven -- Apogee Acoustics Re-builder/Restorer

Graz, I'm likely to go "semi" active
Preamp to XRV1, adjusted signal to bass ribbons amp, XRV1 to the other amp which drives the passive filter which then splits signals to mids and treble ribbons
I hope I'm paraphrasing Henk and Lissnr correctly

My question is that if I go down this path I will literally be on my own in my space with a pair of Divas, NATs, additional bass ribbons amp, and XRV1 (or First Watt F4), and a big bottle of whiskey LOL!

My question is whether using the XRV1 is intuitive enough that I can input 550 and 12k for stated Divas crossover points and at least get a half decent sound?

Or does my question demonstrate my lack of understanding here?
 
Graz, I'm likely to go "semi" active
Preamp to XRV1, adjusted signal to bass ribbons amp, XRV1 to the other amp which drives the passive filter which then splits signals to mids and treble ribbons
I hope I'm paraphrasing Henk and Lissnr correctly

My question is that if I go down this path I will literally be on my own in my space with a pair of Divas, NATs, additional bass ribbons amp, and XRV1 (or First Watt F4), and a big bottle of whiskey LOL!

My question is whether using the XRV1 is intuitive enough that I can input 550 and 12k for stated Divas crossover points and at least get a half decent sound?

Or does my question demonstrate my lack of understanding here?

Henk has a lot of whiskey bottles on his floor in front of the Grands.
 
Henk has a lot of whiskey bottles on his floor in front of the Grands.

I've noticed that the level in those bottles has a very distinct and marked influence on the perceived sound quality..

It's as if by lowering the resonance frequency of the bottles (more air in them) the sound quality improves.

More research is needed here though:)
 
I guess that's better than lots of glass in windows behind them

My last reservations about going this path pretty much centres on ease of use of external active crossovers. As I say, having no one in the room to help me with a pair of highly daunting speakers, different tech amps, and a crossover, is certainly a challenge
 
Hi Marc

If you only want to relieve the midrange-treble amp from bass duties, you don't need an active x-over. The standard Diva x-over offers seperate binding posts for the bass panel and for the mrtw-section
Why not just bi-amp first...?
 
@carl

Do you know what amps Kip is using for the bass? The Krell monos he used with his Scinnies back then?
What x-over does he use?
 
Christoph, I'm a little confused by this
I thought the alternatives were basic single amping, as most do their Duettas, using Apogee passive crossover...
...OR active bi/tri amping (my stated example being bi amping via Pass and Apogee MRT filter split)
Now, you are saying I can PASSIVELY biamp via Apogee crossover?
 
Almost all (stock) Apogees offer at least the option for bi-wiring / bi-amping.

I even had Henk incorporate tri-wiring terminals on my scinnies instead of the stock bi-wiring terminals.
 
Christoph, I believe the Divas that Henk will demo to me are single amped passively
I'll obviously ask him more about options
But after 8 years with room adjustable sub bass on my Zus, and the uncompromising nature of Divas, my room, and mixing/matching SETs with SS/hybrid v-fet, I can't quite see how running Divas bi amped without an active crossover could be fully succesful
Or do you believe this attitude is incorrect?
 
Christoph, I believe the Divas that Henk will demo to me are single amped passively
I'll obviously ask him more about options
But after 8 years with room adjustable sub bass on my Zus, and the uncompromising nature of Divas, my room, and mixing/matching SETs with SS/hybrid v-fet, I can't quite see how running Divas bi amped without an active crossover could be fully succesful
Or do you believe this attitude is incorrect?

Uncompromising nature? Panels sound fine once you have the right space. After that it's finding best amp fit for you. There are many amps which will make it sound good. Part of my decision to start with duettas is to find a preferred amp before I biamp to the bigger brothers
 
Last edited:
I've noticed that the level in those bottles has a very distinct and marked influence on the perceived sound quality..

It's as if by lowering the resonance frequency of the bottles (more air in them) the sound quality improves.

More research is needed here though:)

Hi Henk, agreed, and I have done my fair share of research

12668893924_efd0842f13_c.jpg
 
Last edited:
As is said, almost all stock Apogees offer at least Bi-Wiring / Bi-Amping Terminals.

Just to see if your NATs can handle the whole speaker or only the mrtw section, you don't need an expensive active x-over.

What is true for one individual doesn't have to be true for you.
You can even drive the Divas at first with your NAT alone and evolve from there.
You don't have to go all-in right from the beginning.
 
Christoph, I'm a little confused by this
I thought the alternatives were basic single amping, as most do their Duettas, using Apogee passive crossover...
...OR active bi/tri amping (my stated example being bi amping via Pass and Apogee MRT filter split)
Now, you are saying I can PASSIVELY biamp via Apogee crossover?

Panel Apogee's have discrete crossover connections, biamping with identical sensitivity level power amps is encouraged*, and biwiring essential...

* Relative level disparity can be compensated for at line level in a pre with multiple outputs, that way your power connection would be at it's most efficient.
 
Guys, I'm gonna take a back seat on this thread for a while
I've got plenty of evidence of lack of consensus but also some very forthright views too
I don't want my lack of knowledge and familiarity to monopolise the thread
My next step is to listen to Divas and Duettas
Jon and Henk both have my details and my stated desire to visit them
I'll hold my fire in the meantime

Thanks gentlemen for all your time and advice, it's been much appreciated
 
@carl

Do you know what amps Kip is using for the bass? The Krell monos he used with his Scinnies back then?
What x-over does he use?

I think at that time, yes, but it's been a few years. I think he may have been looking for something else. The MRT on the Full Range are big ribbons and cover the frequency range of most of the lower midrange , so the bass panel covers just about the bass and high bass regions. He could have an entirely different setup now. I corresponded with Kip quite a bit for a while, but not for over three years now.

If I were to bi-amp an Apogee passively, I would use integrated amplifiers to allow volume adjustment. I can adjust the volume between my Analysis Epsilon panels, subwoofers, tweeters, and it really makes a difference in room adaptation, and also just adapting the system between vinyl, digital, computer music etc.
 
It's become apparent that Kip is biamping NAT SE2SEs triodes to MRTs with behemoth Old School Krell big beasties to the bass ribbons
I am very impressed he can pull this off seamlessly
 
@carl

Do you know what amps Kip is using for the bass? The Krell monos he used with his Scinnies back then?
What x-over does he use?

Hello everyone! It has been a long time since I've jumped on any forum discussions, mostly because I've just been so darned happy with the sound of my system the last few years that I'm not on the hunt for any changes. When I was informed that a picture of my dedicated listening room and a discussion of my system was actively in progress, I checked it out, and am now here to share some thoughts and updates. Of course, none of my musical bliss would have been possible without the wonderful work of Graz with his knowledge and hard work on keeping Apogee loudspeakers alive and well, and I have to thank Rich Murry, too, for rebuilding my FRs to such a lovely level (though he now says mine represent the bottom of the heap compared to what he produces now!). ;-)

First, I think the biggest positive change in my system has been the construction of my dedicated listening space. Its internal dimensions are 18 feet W X 29 feet D by 9.5 feet H, and the position of the speakers and room treatments also made an enormous, positive impact. I am thoroughly pleased with the results of this room after I hired Bob Hodas to assist me with these items and layout.

The other positive changes come from the amplification and crossover now used. I discovered NAT amplifiers during an audition a few years ago, and simply could not believe how the same track played at the same db level through the same system could sound so wildly different by just changing amplifiers. It was an unforgettable experience, and as a result, I am solidly in the SET camp, impressed with their uncanny ability recreate nuanced musical cues, natural tone and ambience that is breathtakingly realistic, in my opinion. Because my amplifiers, the SE2SE, are parallel single-ended with GE 211 tubes, I have seen no struggling with driving the midrange and tweeters--even directly through an active crossover when I tried that. However, I have settled on keeping the stock interface box of the Full ranges for the MRTW ribbons, so the impedance the NAT amps now see is very reasonable. Again, all I can say is that their presentation is magical, and I treasure them as a key part of my system.

By the way, the amplifiers I use to drive the bass ribbons--and here I do drive them directly, bypassing the interface box--are fully refurbished Krell KMA-160 mono blocks. I've tried a variety of tube amplifiers in a variety of configurations on the bass, but the results were always disappointing to my ears. Yes, some people will never accept solid state amplifiers in their systems, and I get their bias against them--after all, I just admitted how enchanting the NATs are--but to complete the most realistic picture of music in my room for my tastes, I have found these Krell amplifiers to do the job admirably. These are different sounding than the Krell FBP 350Mcx mono blocks I used to own for the Scintillas I used to own, and I prefer their sonic signature over them, too.

I used to use the stock passive crossover in my system, but a very sharp technician and recording engineer I know coaxed me into trying an active crossover design of his, and I was extremely impressed with the improvement in transparency I heard, so I had him build an active crossover for me, (controversially, perhaps) keeping the same crossover frequency between the drivers as the stock passive crossover. It is a lovely addition.

My front end remains relatively unchanged, and is sure to make some people smile and others grimace, but I love every note that the gear produces. From source to amps, it consists of my fully restored Studer A80 RC MK II with stock electronics (and no dedicated tape preamp which, as another recording engineer once told me, seemed to work pretty well for many of the records we treasure!). It remains my favorite source by a large margin. Next, my Micro Seiki RX-5000 turntable continues its daily trouble-free use, and it continues to imply it will live long beyond me. Though I have two tonearms mounted on it (a Basis Vector MK 3 and the Thomas Schick 12-inch), I have discovered I far prefer the Schick and use it almost exclusively. Of course, this could be that my switch to a fully refurbished (by John Wright in England) Decca SC4E cartridge for daily listening so outperforms my Ortofon A90 cartridge that I will never go back to a modern design. If you've never had the pleasure of literally being startled by the dynamics of a vintage Decca cartridge, then you owe it to yourself to give it a try. It's a perfect match for the speed of Apogee ribbons. My phono preamp remains the venerable BAT VK-P10SE with SuperPak and some interesting NOS tubes. It also remains a delight, and after a shootout with some other heavy hitters last year, to my ears at least, I'm not sure I'll find anything to replace it.

On the digital front, I have added a Mac mini which plays ripped and downloaded files from a Synology 1515+ NAS remotely located in my house and connected to the system via Ethernet. The music player software I have settled on, after trying several, including Roon, is the brilliant Audirvana 2. No metadata issues here! I just moved from a Mytek Stereo 192 DSD DAC to their new Brooklyn DAC, and agree with most users of this piece that ambient cues are improved, and its ability to now play DXD, DSD256 and MQA files is frosting on the cake. Though I will always be an analog fan at heart, this combination and the clear view of every piece of digital music on a 12.9-inch iPad Pro makes for an intoxicating experience.

All of these sources are fed into a BAT VK-31SE preamp which to my ears still sounds wonderful all these years on.

Since the view of the Apogee Full Ranges has already been posted in this thread, I thought I'd include another view, this time looking back from the speakers towards the back of the room and seating area. I hope this answers some of the questions members have posted, and I am thrilled to see such interest in Apogee loudspeakers here. They have impressed me beyond words, and I feel very lucky to own them.

Kip

listening_room2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fantastic feedback, Kip! Do you have a screen that comes down from the ceiling? Is that what that appears to be in the photo? And a trap door above the couch holding the projector?
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu