Let’s see how it sounds to me inCongrats on yr results, btw.
In have gone from to lively with bad imaging relative untreated , trough to much absorption with good imaging but dark balance with stunted dynamics and have landed at lively with diffusers and some bass absorbing. My situation is somewhat different from yours. I have sturdy wood floors laid on concrete, no basement, and bricks on most walls, my crossover lets me correct dips orLagonda, if I do have a remaining area of possible impvt, it is maxxing room acoustics. The room itself as baseline is pretty good to start, any drastic positives from here would be a real bonus.
What has been your decision making progress re absorption, diffusion, bass traps, listening position etc?
My room actually sounds pretty good, even untreated 22” x 36” with 7,9” wood ceilings. Im not using the rooms on the second floor above and haveLagonda, my previous room sounded akin to yours.
Square-like/half-cube at 29x27x13, solid wood on concrete floor, concrete ceiling, 27x13 front wall, over half the area glass, system to one half of this width meaning one spkr side wall reinforced, one in free space, effectively 8 corners w my various alcoves and mezzanines.
Prognosis NEGATIVE!
I could never get a calm warm sound, bass wooly and overblown, imaging a mess.
New room, despite the potential shortcomings of 30° descending eaves, short side walls, and 12" deep protruding steels, 7 over the 48' total depth of my room, is a 180 turnaround. I've been able after a period to get much more cohesive bass, and now way better imaging.
My only caveat, and I could just be imagining an issue, is that the warm balance could benefit from diffusion more than the absorption panels I'm currently using.
I heard a narrow long room resently with SMT diffusers on side and back walls that sounded amazing for its size. He was using removable SMT acrylic wing diffusers behind the listening position and it made a huge difference on imaging. Maybe worth a try.Lagonda, my previous room sounded akin to yours.
Square-like/half-cube at 29x27x13, solid wood on concrete floor, concrete ceiling, 27x13 front wall, over half the area glass, system to one half of this width meaning one spkr side wall reinforced, one in free space, effectively 8 corners w my various alcoves and mezzanines.
Prognosis NEGATIVE!
I could never get a calm warm sound, bass wooly and overblown, imaging a mess.
New room, despite the potential shortcomings of 30° descending eaves, short side walls, and 12" deep protruding steels, 7 over the 48' total depth of my room, is a 180 turnaround. I've been able after a period to get much more cohesive bass, and now way better imaging.
My only caveat, and I could just be imagining an issue, is that the warm balance could benefit from diffusion more than the absorption panels I'm currently using.
Carl, Mike is super busy enough buying Dart 468s without checking his shadow Lol.I think Marc has a new hashtag: #MikelLite. We better not arm him with a million in spare change sloshing around.
Marc, the fact that your rear wall is so far behind you is why i suggested theLagonda, my issue is deciding the balance of absorption and diffusion in my room, esp w Duke Le Jeune's contention to totally deal w near/first reflections and make the most of far reflections (if I've understood his Reverberant Field thread correctly).
This would mean looking at diffusers to front wall, maybe 6x6 or 9x6 expanse, single 4x2 diffusers on side walls first and second pts, and light, ceiling friendly 4x4 eaves diffusers, in my room.
My rear wall is so far behind me, 14'-24', as to be inconsequential re need for diffusers.
GIK in UK or Thomann De are my likely destinations. There is also the more pricey option of Stillpoints Apertures, which combine absorption/diffusion, and Accustica Applicata or ASC.
No, it is like a dividing screen made of see trough slotted acrylic, you place it at a distance behind your seat. I will try to find the post from the member here.So, it would be centrally behind me on rear wall? That would be close to 24' away. Or site it mid room, on a stand maybe, much closer to the rear of my seat? How close?
Dukes recent post just made me re -examen my room reflections, myAlso, I thought Duke Le Jeune had no issue w reflections/reflected energy, as long as the first reflection points were fully dealt with.
By definition, aren't rear wall/room reflections NOT first points?
Here it is Marc.Sure
Appreciated