Vote today... Mitt Romney or Barack Obama

Mitt Romney or Barack Obama

  • Mitt Romney

    Votes: 30 44.8%
  • Barack Obama

    Votes: 37 55.2%

  • Total voters
    67
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well on another note it appears this poll will not be representative of the final outcome. Interesting !

Actually i do believe it does, not the popular vote , but the results , the oligarchs have invested a lot and i haven't seen any signs they are willing to replace Ohhh, recent Bengahzi cover up is very telling IMO ..
 
It can always do so - this is a simple techically. It can currently do so at low cost because other nations are willing to accumulate huge $ reserves. If that changes the cost willl go up dramatically, and doing so woudl lead to hyperinflation. However, technically, the government can always resort to monetary financing of its own debt (with the exemption of countries in the Euro zone, who do not control their own central bank)

The reserves you speak of is only possibly because of our petro economy ,which create's a demand for the USD, without , the USD would be practically worthless...
 
On a technical note - every girl has a daddy (dead of alive). If it so happens our "girl in the low candy yielding hood's" father is not around that does not change anything, unless one subscribes to the idea that children that do not have enough candy to live on because of the choices made by their parents should be exempt from receiving candy redistributed from more fortunate children, as a matter of principle.
Actually, the girl's circumstance of birth changes everything because it goes to the core issue of how to help those who desperately need our attention.

Assuming her situation is brought on by her environment, exactly what conditions caused her environment? That is a pertinent questions because a problem cannot be properly addressed unless we know what caused it. Then, who do we trust to fix it best?

Bear in mind that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, and also bear in mind that unintended consequences are possible. Also, remember that we are dealing with individuals, not things.


I won't get into the living on candy part! :D


By the way, I don't have a clue how to fix society, and I'm not so sure that anyone else does, either.
 
Well on another note it appears this poll will not be representative of the final outcome. Interesting !
Our margin of error given the number of people who have voted is 13%. So right now it is still not deterministic which candidate will win based on WBF population :).
 
Our margin of error given the number of people who have voted is 13%. So right now it is still not deterministic which candidate will win based on WBF population :).
What this tells me is that Democrats sleep late. BTW, the other reason this poll might not represent reality is that you are limiting each of us to one vote.
 
This is a straw poll.
 
What this tells me is that Democrats sleep late. BTW, the other reason this poll might not represent reality is that you are limiting each of us to one vote.

:D

You are also assuming that votes were along party lines ...
 
We should have the candidates to spend some money on WBF. From today's report:http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57544716-83/your-vote-costs-obama-and-romney-about-$22/

"If you're an average online American, you're worth about $22 to the U.S. presidential campaigns, at least in terms of ad cost per vote. .... The Obama and Romney campaigns have spent about $5 billion on online advertising so far but people are no longer receptive to traditional text or banner ads, says Abine privacy attorney and privacy advocate Sarah Downey....."

I think we should pass a new law that says 1% of what they spend should be given to a fact checking group which puts their opinion at the end of each ad! The money they spent would create 250,000 jobs paying $20K for one year!!!
 
We should have the candidates to spend some money on WBF. From today's report:http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57544716-83/your-vote-costs-obama-and-romney-about-$22/

"If you're an average online American, you're worth about $22 to the U.S. presidential campaigns, at least in terms of ad cost per vote. .... The Obama and Romney campaigns have spent about $5 billion on online advertising so far but people are no longer receptive to traditional text or banner ads, says Abine privacy attorney and privacy advocate Sarah Downey....."

I think we should pass a new law that says 1% of what they spend should be given to a fact checking group which puts their opinion at the end of each ad! The money they spent would create 250,000 jobs paying $20K for one year!!!
Can we retool this site to be about 'green' power? That would generate some money. Sorry, I don't want to risk getting banned. :)- I'm guessing I'm a little borderline here.
 
I think we should pass a new law that says 1% of what they spend should be given to a fact checking group which puts their opinion at the end of each ad! The money they spent would create 250,000 jobs paying $20K for one year!!!

Re-visiting The World Is Flat Amir? :)
 
Actually, the girl's circumstance of birth changes everything because it goes to the core issue of how to help those who desperately need our attention.

Assuming her situation is brought on by her environment, exactly what conditions caused her environment? That is a pertinent questions because a problem cannot be properly addressed unless we know what caused it. Then, who do we trust to fix it best?

Bear in mind that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, and also bear in mind that unintended consequences are possible. Also, remember that we are dealing with individuals, not things.


I won't get into the living on candy part! :D


By the way, I don't have a clue how to fix society, and I'm not so sure that anyone else does, either.

Agree with all of what your saying (especially the last sentence). My only point was that the root causes of why a child is in need of help should have no bearing on whether she should have access to (publicly funded) help. However, how to most effectively help the girl may vary greatly depending on these root causes.
 
Obama seems to have early voter lead in key states

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama heads toward Election Day with an apparent lead over Republican Mitt Romney among early voters in key states that could decide the election.

Obama's advantage, however, isn't as big as the one he had over John McCain four years ago, giving Romney's campaign hope that the former Massachusetts governor can erase the gap when people vote on Tuesday.

About 25 million people already have voted in 34 states and the District of Columbia. No votes will be counted until Election Day but several battleground states are releasing the party affiliation of people who have voted early.

So far, Democratic voters outnumber Republicans in Florida, Iowa, Nevada, North Carolina and Ohio — five states that could decide the election, if they voted the same way. Republicans have the edge in Colorado, which Obama won in 2008.

Obama dominated early voting in 2008, building up such big leads in Colorado, Florida, Iowa and North Carolina that he won each state despite losing the Election Day vote, according to voting data compiled by The Associated Press.

"In 2008, the McCain campaign didn't have any mobilization in place to really do early voting," said Michael McDonald, an early voting expert at George Mason University who tallies voting statistics for the United States Elections Project. "This time around the Romney campaign is not making the same mistake as the McCain campaign did."

McDonald said he sees a shift toward Republicans among early voters, which could make a difference in North Carolina, which Obama won by the slimmest of margins in 2008, only 14,000 votes. The Republican shift, however, might not be enough to wipe out Obama's advantage in Iowa and Nevada, which Obama won more comfortably in 2008.

In Colorado, Florida and Ohio, get ready for a long night of vote counting on Tuesday.

Romney's campaign aides say they are doing so much better than McCain did four years ago that Romney is in great shape to overtake Obama in many of the most competitive states.

"They are underperforming what their 2008 numbers were and we are overperforming where we were in 2008," said Rich Beeson, Romney's political director. "We feel very good heading into the Tuesday election."

Obama's campaign counters that Romney can't win the presidency simply by doing better than McCain.

"It's not about whether or not they're doing better than John McCain did," said Jeremy Bird, Obama's national field director. "It's about whether or not they're doing better than us."

About 35 percent of voters are expected to cast ballots before Tuesday, either by mail or in person.

Voters always can cross party lines when they vote for any office, and there are enough independent voters in many states to swing the election, if enough of them vote the same way. Still, both campaigns are following the early voting numbers closely, using them to gauge their progress and plan their Election Day strategies.

A look at early voting in the tightest states:

___

Colorado

About 1.5 million people have voted, and Republicans outnumber Democrats 37 percent to 35 percent. Those numbers are a reversal from four years ago at this time. Inevitably, Obama won the early vote by 9 percentage points in 2008, giving him a big enough cushion to win the state, despite narrowly losing the Election Day vote.

Early voting in Colorado is expected to account for about 80 percent of all votes cast, giving it more weight than in other states.

___

Florida

About 3.5 million people have voted, and 43 percent were Democrats and 40 percent were Republicans. For years ago at this time, Democratic early voters had a 9 percentage point lead over Republicans.

Obama won Florida's early vote by 10 percentage points in 2008, getting 400,000 more early votes than McCain, enough to offset McCain's advantage on Election Day.

In Florida, Republicans have historically done better among people who vote by mail, while Democrats have done better among people who vote early in person. For 2012, Florida's Republican-led Legislature reduced the number of in-person early voting days from 14 to eight.

The Obama campaign responded by encouraging more supporters to vote by mail, and Democrats were able to narrow the gap among mail ballots. Democrats quickly took the lead among all early voters, once in-person early voting started. But the margins are slim.

The Obama campaign acknowledges it must do better among Florida's Election Day voters than Obama did on 2008, when McCain won the Election Day vote by 5 percentage points.

___

Iowa

About 584,000 people have voted, already exceeding Iowa's total number of early votes in 2008. So far this year, 43 percent of early voters were Democrats and 32 percent were Republicans.

Four years ago, Obama won the early vote in Iowa by a whopping 27 percentage points, 63 percent to 36 percent. McCain, meanwhile, won the Election Day vote by about 1,800 votes — less than a percentage point. Together, they added up to a 10-point victory for Obama.

Romney's campaign argues that Democrats always do better among early voters in Iowa while Republicans do better among Election Day voters, even when President George W. Bush narrowly carried the state in 2004.

Obama's campaign counters that with early voting on the rise, Romney will be left with fewer Election Day voters to make up the difference.

___

Nevada

About 627,000 people have voted, and 44 percent were Democrats and 37 percent were Republicans. Four years ago, Obama won Nevada's early vote big, 59 percent to 39 percent. Obama also won Nevada's Election Day vote on his way to a comfortable 13-point win over McCain.

The Romney campaign argues that Obama isn't doing nearly as well among early voters in Nevada as he did in 2008. The Obama campaign argues that it doesn't have to.

___

North Carolina

About 2.3 million people have voted, and 48 percent of them were Democrats and 32 percent of them were Republicans. Four years ago at this time, Democrats had a slightly larger lead over Republicans, and Obama won the early vote by 11 percentage points.

Obama lost the Election Day Vote by 17 percentage points in 2008. But the early vote was much bigger than the Election Day vote, resulting in Obama's narrow win.

Obama's campaign cites the big lead for Democrats among early voters, while Romney's campaign argues that even a small shift toward the Republicans could flip the state to Romney.

___

Ohio

About 1.3 million people have voted, and 29 percent were Democrats and 23 percent were Republicans. Forty-seven percent were unaffiliated, more than enough voters to swing the state to either candidate.

Ohio may once again be pivotal in the race for the presidency. Unfortunately, Ohio's early voting data is limited. Party affiliation in Ohio is based on the last primary in which a voter participated, so new voters and those who don't vote in primaries are listed as unaffiliated.

In 2008, Obama won Ohio by 5 percentage points.
 
Gee a 9 pt. lead for Obama on WBF...big surprise there
 
Poll results at the top of the page....Barack misspelled and Romney in italics. What are we to conclude from that?
 
Didn't Maureen Dowd have some scenario in which, if the real election actually resulted in a tie, that it could be Romney, Pres and Biden, V-P? Now that would be worth paying for. :)
 
Poll results at the top of the page....Barack misspelled and Romney in italics. What are we to conclude from that?

Hello, es347. You are the second person to mention the italics. Weird. When I first saw the thread, neither was in italics. Same as when I log out and view the thread. It is only when I log in that one is italicized and that is the one whom received my vote. As for the misspelling? Wasn't me. :)

Tom
 
Hello, es347. You are the second person to mention the italics. Weird. When I first saw the thread, neither was in italics. Same as when I log out and view the thread. It is only when I log in that one is italicized and that is the one whom received my vote. As for the misspelling? Wasn't me. :)

Tom
Indeed. Forum software will italicize the one you voted for.
 
Well on another note it appears this poll will not be representative of the final outcome. Interesting !

---- We're still 45 votes short for statistically representing (reflecting) a scientific approximation of probability. ...A fair average. :b
 
Gee a 9 pt. lead for Obama on WBF...big surprise there

---- 10 point lead now. :b

Poll results at the top of the page....Barack misspelled and Romney in italics. What are we to conclude from that?

---- That, and a few other things too, but it's all fun anyway.
No big deal, we are very clement of our friend's mizpelling. :b
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu