In your reply to my post you somehow ignored my point 8., which clearly states that I selected my PranaFidelity Dhyana speakers being keenly aware of the problem of speakers often being too big for a given room. No one looking at the modest speaker dimensions I cited would reasonably suggest that they are too large for my room (24 ft x 12 ft x 8.5 ft).
I had first heard them at a show in a hotel room considerably smaller than my room, with no bass traps whatsoever and both bass reflex ports of the speakers open (maximum bass output). Never was there too much bass; in fact, on some music I would have preferred adding a subwoofer.
So the bass problem in my room is really specific to the room, not the speaker *). I was able to plug one of the two bass reflex ports without affecting driver excursion, which helped considerably in my room (I love that flexibility of the speakers), but a basic problem of the 70-Hz hump, typical of many rooms, still remained. My room unfortunately also has a bad ratio, a straight 1:2 ratio width to length (12 ft:24 ft). This is just what it is, I can't change that and have to work with what I have.
A 60-80 Hz hump is very common for rooms; there are even programs online where you can plug in room dimensions and what often comes out is a hump somewhere in the bass region. You cannot wish that away, and to suggest that in every room you can fix all problems with just speaker positioning while completely foregoing bass traps in all cases, or to suggest that bass traps are the "enemy", or to suggest that "non-audiophile" room furnishings are the solution to everything, is just nothing but inexperience and/or strong bias and goes against hard physics.
Yet even the article does not say that. It states (emphasis added):
Begin by removing all artificial treatments from the room, such as panels, corner traps, and diffusers, especially if they have been arbitrarily put up and not based on measured room acoustics. If the room sounds muffled or has a “recording studio” quality when you speak, it indicates that the room’s tonality is off. These treatments may not address the root cause of the issue, so it’s best to remove them and then slowly add them back, only when deemed appropriate. Many treatments primarily absorb high frequencies, offering little to no help with bass, which is often the main problem.
The paragraph implies that sometimes you may indeed need treatments. Yet contra his last sentence in the paragraph, ASC TubeTraps are extraordinarily effective in fighting bass problems, with a comparably moderate effect on damping of high frequencies.
Also the big room at Goodwin's High End has severe bass issues, with a pronounced hump at 70 Hz. They usually take care of that very efficiently with ASC TubeTraps. Yet once I auditioned Rockport Lyra speakers in the room, and the Rockport people had chosen to remove the ASC Tubetraps in favor of more liveliness of the room. Annoyingly, I had to sit through that 70-Hz hump on much material, which very much dimmed my enjoyment of the session. Here the "remedy" of removing the TubeTraps was clearly worse than the "illness" that the Rockport people wanted to cure. If you ask me, it was a silly mistake by them. The TubeTraps should have remained in the room.
***
Yes, I had to fight bass issues with my floor standers because of my specific room, but I would not go back to monitors, as I used to have, just because of that problem. For my personal preferences, I made the right choice buying those speakers.
_______________________________________
*) It's not my tube amp with its damping factor either. I have tested two SS amps with my speakers in my room, and the difference in bass amount and bass control to my tube amp was minimal.