Regarding the original question, I have a Hifi Rose RS130 streamer and paired it with a RD160 dac by SPF connection, and I thought I heard clear improvements using SPF over any other cable. My RS130 received a SPF fiber optic connection for its internet connection as well. Then, Hifi Rose introduced the RS151, allegedly the RS130 and RD160 in one box. I bought the RS151 also. It was only the cost of one box, a 50 percent savings and more room on my rack . However, the RS151 lacks a master clock input and a SPF fiber optic internet connection input. So, what's my point ? While the one box saves money, it seems like at least with Hifi Rose you lose the ability to use an external clock and a fiber optic SPF connection. Do I think that matters? Yes , because I have my RS130 streamer, Gustard network switch, and DAC that are all running off the same Esoteric clock . And, I prefer a fiber optic SPF internet connection to my streamer where possible . The all-in-one solution eliminates the advantage of a SPF fiber optic connection between the streamer and DAC. Moreover, value-wise, the RS151 one-box solution will be very hard to beat for 5k-ish as the ability to synchronize a streamer, dac, and network switch with a master clock, and use a SPF fiber optic connection to the streamer may just be marginal improvements not significant enough for justification, but the jury remains out.