Can digital get to vinyl sound and at what price?
- Thread starter ScottK
- Start date
I got to that point a few years ago. Listened to a lot of DACs including those, bought the Playback Designs MPT8 and MPD8. I stopped buying vinyl not long after. Still have my vinyl rig and records but don't listen to it very often.
The only evidence is that people gave up understanding the implementation and the original thread died. Please go on being the only one marching in step. And sorry to see that, as with other people in this forum, you try switching to a battle of insults again.
They use several types of speakers, most of which are well known and used in nearly every studio.
They also use industry standard monitoring headphones.
It's the lack of hearing acuity found with the people of this profession that should be the most troubling.
Republicoftexas69
Well-Known Member
You are right, but the question is that we can't guess what they used in a particularly recording - only exceptionally technical details are listed. In absence of knowledge, we can not claim accuracy.
And then you also have Audio's Circle of Confusion, which puts into question meaningful standardization and with that, claims of "accuracy":
Audio's Circle of Confusion
Audio’s “Circle of Confusion” is a term coined by Floyd Toole [1] that describes the confusion that exists within the audio recording and r...
seanolive.blogspot.com
To circle back to digital vs analog... It seems that vinyl appeals to many because they find it breathes life into the sound, whereas digital seems dull and artificial. I personally don't know why vinyl, when done right, can sound so pleasing, and frankly I don't care to understand. We can argue endlessly about this, with lots of technical information whose significance is hard to evaluate.
My main interest is to see how good digital can sound, consistently across all my recordings. At the end of the day, analog is not a "reference". Why would it be? Who says that's the best we can do?
My main interest is to see how good digital can sound, consistently across all my recordings. At the end of the day, analog is not a "reference". Why would it be? Who says that's the best we can do?
I‘m trying to resist buying new vinyl. Have a rather large collection I bought 20 years ago. Eventually I will tire or be unable to deal with the mechanics of record play. Hopefully when that happens digital will be there?
If you find digital dull, lifeless and artifical, then you have a problem with digital implementation in your system. It's not a problem of digital per se.
I am very happy with the lively, exciting yet also well-flowing music from digital that I hear at home.
Vinyl sounds romantic and "musical " Becaue it has distortion that digital doesn't have
No logical man can think a needle on a spinning plastic plate can be more accurate than digital
No logical man can think a needle on a spinning plastic plate can be more accurate than digital
A) Logic is not the human sense we hear with, so I don't understand what logic has to do with subjectivist audio.
B) I don't know what you mean here by "accurate." (I wonder if even you know what you mean by "accurate.")
Accuracy is not one of our four main objectives of high-end audio. Please consider our starting point list for this topic:
1) recreate the sound of an original musical event,
2) reproduce exactly what is on the master tape,
3) create a sound subjectively pleasing to the audiophile, and
4) create a sound that seems live.
Perhaps by "accurate" you mean "2) reproduce exactly what is on the master tape"?
C) "Analog" means analog; analog does not mean "vinyl." If the mechanism of vinyl reproduction is too old-school for you, then think in terms of analog tape, which is played on a machine with which you might be more comfortable.
D) In this hobby world "musical" is a compliment, not an insult.
Last edited:
You need to have a conversation with Carlos269. I’m sure the two of you can get this sorted out.
My “spinning plastic plate” is made of Delrin and cast iron, and the subplatter of copper, aluminum, and stainless-steel. It weighs 180 lbs. I don't have any needles on my TT, but my wife uses them to sew with.
However, I’m glad that you agree that vinyl sounds both romantic and musical - as it does and it offers such sonic realness and so much more …
I thought that was the most likely candidate for your objective.
then dsd won't cut it. if you bother to compare directly, it will require tape or vinyl.
tape will be equivalent, nearly identical. vinyl will add a little something, but will be musically complete. dsd or pcm will be slightly diminished and by degrees incomplete. this is assuming you are using top level examples of each format.
OTOH digital can sound top notch and be much more access able. just don't expect it to equal the tape and you are golden.
Last edited:
You are using data points reasonably well, but you might benefit by asking different questions. Just my opinion.
For example:
1) If dac chips and opamp chips have been pushing the theoretical boundaries for noise and distortion for 40+ years is everything now, using such or better, the same sonically?
2) what measurements matter?
3) If you have heard great mid century recordings in their native format, played on decent equipment, do they sound 10-100x inferior to modern digital renditions? If not why? They should right?
Digital is there now. My Playback Designs digital is as good or better than my excellent Reed 3C turntable vinyl. Each is about MSRP $40K. I did a comparison again last week because of all the chatter on this thread claiming digital is inferior.
Digital vs analog is ultimately about recordings anyway.
Recordings show performances
Systems show recordings
Recordings show performances
Systems show recordings
Similar threads
