In fact I appreciate your views and really enjoy reading your opinions. Thumbs up showed it, even if we show some disagreement. But in fact I consider transparency a must in this hobby and I find this "optimization" issues a nebulous affair, that IMO benefit from proper discussion - it is why I answered to your posts. BTW, I had no problem with cross posting in threads - on the contrary I consider it a positive aspect of WBF.
Although not directly or intentionally, strong accusations against the high-end in general are being made when someone considers the numbers and status of poor setting up that you refer. When people find that they are not free to say what other people do in their systems and consider set up proprietary, I feel really sad. Probably others disagree, but it is my way of looking at high-end. And I am very cautious with "unique" messianic people that can't be scrutinized - I don't doubt they do excellent work, but can't see them as the model for this hobby.
I have no doubts that mysticism is part of high-end - we can't have rationale explanations for everything. I exclude some paths in the hobby because of it. But I hope that speaker placement is not part of it - we can't have high-end systems without it.