Devert, I guess Barry saw your comments re insinuating snake oil, and assumed you were staying clear. In addition to your hint that maybe the effects of Entreq not being easily explained by standard laws of physics. Unless you're open minded to see if your reservations could be challenged, or have a broad sense of humour and are cool to try stuff. No hope for Purite Keith I'm afraid.
In my opinion, I think it's been a massive drawback that this stuff is described in terms of grounding, esp re the ambiguity confusing it w/the electrical ground installation that can't be interfered w/re safety. I'm not sure what term could have been used, but I'm sure for every potential buyer who's open to the concept, there's another who can't get past their skepticism/confusion w/traditional function of electrical grounding. Maybe "impedance matching", or "electrical/RF/EMI sump drainage" might have been more unambiguous (although not as snappy as "grounding").
In my opinion, I think it's been a massive drawback that this stuff is described in terms of grounding, esp re the ambiguity confusing it w/the electrical ground installation that can't be interfered w/re safety. I'm not sure what term could have been used, but I'm sure for every potential buyer who's open to the concept, there's another who can't get past their skepticism/confusion w/traditional function of electrical grounding. Maybe "impedance matching", or "electrical/RF/EMI sump drainage" might have been more unambiguous (although not as snappy as "grounding").