Fair point, but at least for the older generations, HP still has credibility, and frankly, the Absolute Sound has been generally awful in the last couple years. If some of the less august online magazines can get review samples, I gotta believe good ol' Harry P. can too.
Agreed on TAS. HP still has a large following in Asia.
Deleted this accidentally. Jack's post above is a reply I believe.
A good friend of mine who subscribes to TAS until today told me he wonders why HP, in his last few years at TAS, has not reviewed any SOTA speakers from Magico, Wilson, or Rockport, among others, and those speakers were assigned to Valin or Harley. In his own site, will we see HP's opinion on these brands?
Imo, speakers or products under reviewed should be reviewed by at least 2-3 different reviewers , especially where there is no product testing taking place...
Stereophile used to do so many moons go , even while testing , not all the times but some products where listened to by more than one reviewer ...
Imo, speakers or products under reviewed should be reviewed by at least 2-3 different reviewers , especially where there is no product testing taking place...
Stereophile used to do so many moons go , even while testing , not all the times but some products where listened to by more than one reviewer ...
Why do you think this stopped?
Don't you think it has to do with publication deadlines, and the time involved in schlepping the product from one reviewer to another for evaluation before a set of reviews on a single product could be completed?
Also, given the need to get content written, I suspect the magazines want more coverage of different products, rather than an extensive focus on one- though you still see articles where a review is accompanied by a companion piece, like an interview with the designer or tour of the factory.
Don't you think it has to do with publication deadlines, and the time involved in schlepping the product from one reviewer to another for evaluation before a set of reviews on a single product could be completed?
Also, given the need to get content written, I suspect the magazines want more coverage of different products, rather than an extensive focus on one- though you still see articles where a review is accompanied by a companion piece, like an interview with the designer or tour of the factory.
Ohh, There is no way or reason for a product reviewed by 2 different reviewers to take a year to make it to press ....
Imo, speakers or products under reviewed should be reviewed by at least 2-3 different reviewers , especially where there is no product testing taking place...
Stereophile used to do so many moons go , even while testing , not all the times but some products where listened to by more than one reviewer ...
UHF Mag in Canada does this and always has.
Only one month?? I think it's at least 6-8 weeks from review submission to arrival in reader's mailbox, possibly more.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |