Magico M6 and Tube Amp?

Thats full Strawman , none of it was in isolation , Peter was running on Davids vast experience, it was not a shot in the dark, he already did all the vetting ...!
David knew the amp first, which is why he pushed Lamm (not the only valid choice but his choice) and then once Peter had a taste of a proper amp then found a fit with the speakers... Same thing with TimA...who already had Lamm hybrids but had to hear that the pure SET one was better...then he needed the speaker to get the best from...wait for it...the amp. Just because it wasn't Peter doing the homework doesn't make it any different the order of events.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tima and Argonaut
Bonzo agreed , think about that, lack of understand match ..

By definition what was said is academic, or you can go ahead and try your favorite effects box 3 watter on your favorite apogee , while listening to recordings of your Ex at 60db , listening levels necessary to avoid the usual clipping ..
Never tried a 3 watt amp on an Apogee...not that I wouldn't at least experiment to see what happened... I was actually using an amp that was 280 watts into 4 ohms and over 400 watts into 2 ohms (Sphinx Project 14 mkIII) but let's not let the facts get in the way of you spinning a good yarn!

Once I decided SET amps were the way to go, it should be noted that I made a steady move away from hard(ish) to drive speakers (such as Apogees, Electrostats, Genesis...then Odeon bookshelf then Ref 3A, which are also very pretty easy to drive) towards easier and easier ones... culminating in 97dB Odeons and 98dB Hornings...and 100dB DIY...I walk the walk...
 
Its deeper than this , Peter still has the lamms and not the original speakers the lamm could not drive ..

David already knew the amp for the load ..

Well, I had the Lamm M1.1s with the Magico and the Lamm ML2 with the horns. Both combinations were excellent, but I chose the ML2 SETS once I heard them on the Magicos and then contacted David for the horns that I had heard before at his place. I sent the M1.1 back to David, and I sold the Magicos.
 
Thats full Strawman , none of it was in isolation , Peter was running on Davids vast experience, it was not a shot in the dark, he already did all the vetting ...!

Right, it was not in isolation. It was direct experience in Utah and in my own listening room. I was comparing the two amps on the speakers I had and taking into account what I heard in Utah. David's experience was a guide too. The ML2 and horns are a combination, but Brad's point is that I preferred the Lamm SET to the hybrid and made that choice first. The right speakers then followed. In the end, it all worked out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tima
Never tried a 3 watt amp on an Apogee...not that I wouldn't at least experiment to see what happened... I was actually using an amp that was 280 watts into 4 ohms and over 400 watts into 2 ohms (Sphinx Project 14 mkIII) but let's not let the facts get in the way of you spinning a good yarn!

Once I decided SET amps were the way to go, it should be noted that I made a steady move away from hard(ish) to drive speakers (such as Apogees, Electrostats, Genesis...then Odeon bookshelf then Ref 3A, which are also very pretty easy to drive) towards easier and easier ones... culminating in 97dB Odeons and 98dB Hornings...and 100dB DIY...I walk the walk...

Hahahaha, Your projected Irony is so unbecoming ..

Its academic Brad , indirectly proportional, you choose to use an under powered SET amp for it’s sound , so then had to find the loudspeakers ( load) best suited for it , its iso-diametrically the same ..

The obvious way is to find the speakers which meet your criteria , then amp for the load you can inverse , its the same , ok Mr walk the walk ..

In Peter’s case David selected the amp for the load , the Hybrid , Peter preferred the SET tone but not the load , David already knew Peter would be back ..

:)
 
Last edited:
Hahahaha, Your projected Irony is so unbecoming ..

Its academic Brad , indirectly proportional, you choose to use an under powered SET amp for it’s sound , so then had to find the loudspeakers ( load) best suited for it , its iso-diametrically the same ..

The obvious way is to find the speakers which meet your criteria , then amp for the load you can inverse , its the same , ok Mr walk the walk ..

In Peter’s case David selected the amp for the load , the Hybrid , Peter preferred the SET tone but not the load , David already knew Peter would be back ..

:)
First of all it’s INVERSELY proportional not indirectly, which doesn’t even make sense…

I didn’t have the 3 watt SET until MUCH after I started out my SET journey…started with 30 watt ones. Now I have something different again …a 20 watt single stage amp. So, chose the amp type and migrated to easier and easier to drive speakers until had ones that coukd allow a 3 watt amp to shine.

Your amp for load advocacy ignores the obvious problem with difficult loads… 1) you need poor sounding amps to drive them 2) more power doesn’t solve thermal compression issues.
 
Micro focused and silly as usual , more strawman arguments , explain thermal compression in a domestic setting ..

Lost chap ..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: morricab
Would make for a great compare .....
My take - from non-direct compares are both will have great tone. CAT will be more linear and have better attack and dynamics. VAC will be more rounded. Both excellent
 
David knew the amp first, which is why he pushed Lamm (not the only valid choice but his choice) and then once Peter had a taste of a proper amp then found a fit with the speakers... Same thing with TimA...who already had Lamm hybrids but had to hear that the pure SET one was better...then he needed the speaker to get the best from...wait for it...the amp. Just because it wasn't Peter doing the homework doesn't make it any different the order of events.

Yes. Brad, you have this right.

I was reviewing, using and owning Lamm components well before I knew David or Peter. Likewise for my appreciation of natural sound though I did not call it that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morricab
Hello!

Does anybody have any experience using tube amplifiers to drive Magico M6 loudspeakers?

Let's look at this question in the original post from a different perspective. If one owns tube amplifiers, does anybody have experience driving Magico M6 loudspeakers? Some choose speakers first, others choose amplifiers first. Some consider only specific pairings.

My dealer asked Vladimir Lamm which speakers he would recommend for his SET amplifier. Ron, perhaps you should ask Alon Wolf what tube amplifier he recommends for his M6 speakers.
 
Let's look at this question in the original post from a different perspective. If one owns tube amplifiers, does anybody have experience driving Magico M6 loudspeakers? Some choose speakers first, others choose amplifiers first. Some consider only specific pairings.

My dealer asked Vladimir Lamm which speakers he would recommend for his SET amplifier. Ron, perhaps you should ask Alon Wolf what tube amplifier he recommends for his M6 speakers.
Alon's answer is likely, "none".
 
I just read this whole thread. I am not sure I understand some of the back and forth.

The OP is what tube amp would work with an M6 (or really almost any Magico). I am not much of a tube person but I think we can all agree that is not going to be a simple SET. Maybe somethig with a pair of 211's could drive them but likely not on bombastic music at higher volumes. So we are left with high power push pull designs. There are several to choose from CAT, ARC, VAC all have high power amps. In fact, as someone pointed out Magico sets up with CAT at shows frequently. I believe the Lamm hybrid amp would drive Magico but I have not heard that combination.
 
Why not try the AUDIO RESEARCH 330 M.
sounded very good on the S3 mk2 in munich .

I honestly havent heard a good sounding M6 yet.

Forget about large commercial speakers get a wiilson sasha or magico S3 mk2.
Most have integration issues

Wilson XVX .... all fall in the category " trophy sound '
Can you explain what you mean by "commercial speakers"? They are all consumer products, not commercial.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu