I could start another thread titled "It's All a Compromise."
Didn't know we had a marriage forum
I could start another thread titled "It's All a Compromise."
Do you think Frantz that all the drivers and parts in the xover work exactly as described and there aren't ANY tradeoffs esp. of the mutually exclusive persuasion, in the design of electronics and speakers? C'mon. It's always a balancing act between one area (now not to be exact but an example) eg. say dynamics and another say FR.
You know if it all worked as envisioned, we'd be a lot closer to the sound of live music.
Myles
We're back ! I was losing faith with you and I agreeing on the Basketball thread .. ... You are repeating my points ... That is why I mentioned that we can't attain our goal perfectly .. so in a nutshell the goal is to do the least harm to the signal leave it alone as much as possible ... Seems to work rather well doesn't it?
Well I guess I see it another way Frantz. Each high-end designer puts their mark on their own design by making it sound like they think real music sounds like. That's the difference between high-end and mass market. And they are doing less damage since untouched, it's not going to sound right.
That's why every piece of gear whether it's from Krell, Burmester, VAC, cj, ARC, Rowland all have a "house" sound. No two amplifiers sound the same. No two cartridges sound the same. No two DACs sound the same. And so on and so on. That house sound represents that designers signature. Take DEV's favorite amp, the VAC 450. Kevin voices every amplifier that leaves the factory.
One of the nagging questions for me is: "How comfortable would I be in buying one of these three loudspeakers ($100K+) when I couldn't compare them in the same room and system on the same day?" The impracticalities of home audition with products of this size and weight are obvious, but it seems to come down to faith and some "intangible" confidence that you receive with one brand. Anyone care to elaborate on this?
Lee
Interesting that so many of the posts in this thread are by people who would never buy either of these speakers and haven't heard them. Many posts are by someone with no listening room or speakers.;-)
It reminds me of an old story where a man is asked why he reads Playboy.
His answer: I read Playboy for the same reason that I read National Geographic,
they both have beautiful color pictures of places I'm never going to get a chance to visit.
One of the nagging questions for me is: "How comfortable would I be in buying one of these three loudspeakers ($100K+) when I couldn't compare them in the same room and system on the same day?" The impracticalities of home audition with products of this size and weight are obvious, but it seems to come down to faith and some "intangible" confidence that you receive with one brand. Anyone care to elaborate on this?
Lee
Very astute observation Lee
Many of us are attracted to something intangible that a particular brand seems to be good at. I know for a fact that I like Lexus cars better than say. Mercedes .... Wha is it that make me like these ? Same with Steve, very comfortable with Wilson ... Brand Loyalty does change though ...
I will audition very carefully The Aida in May, I will try to have repeat listening there is a dealer in my neck of the wood. There is IMO a change of phiosophy at Sonus Faber .. One toward neutrality without sacrificing what makes the brand as for the XLF maybe one day at a friend's in California ...
you must have another friend in California because it won't be me
Just kind of surprised that for this kind of money that more people aren't seriously looking at the Rockport Arrakis - or the Altair for half the money. Both have more sophisticated drivers and cabinets than all of the speakers previously mentioned.
should be plenty of series 2 Wilsons coming on the market - and prices should be dropping as more of them hit the used market. Doubt you'll find very many used Arrakis.