Hello and good morning
I am not an Taiko Extreme user, not because I don’t think it’s a great product, but because I’m having a lot of fun tramping my own path to audio Nirvana, which involves a very different approach, so my reply is not biased by any pride of ownership or loyalty.
Thanks for your take on this, I really appreciate an answer like this. May I ask which different approach you are going for? You can message me privately if you don’t want to write it here.
But I do pay careful attention to developments at Taiko for the simple reason that there are very few companies doing true R&D into digital audio streaming. As a company Taiko has a fairly simple approach, which is to engineer the very best sound quality they can, without compromise. This involves identifying sonic shortcomings with the current state of the art, doing the research to discover the causes of those shortcomings, doing the development and experimentation to resolve those shortcomings then doing the engineering to build commercial solutions. When you look at a Taiko Extreme, what you see is a ‘fancy‘ computer.
So “engineer” meaning mix and try components back and forth etc.
Yeah, this I understand, but it´s the “best sound” in their ears so to speak, I´m guessing that they are measuring as well.
What you are actually looking at is an instrument designed from the ground up to produce the finest sonics possible within the realms of current technology. This search for perfection is what drives Taiko. Every component in an Extreme has been carefully evaluated against multiple alternatives in order to discover which produces the finest sonics.
“multiple alternatives”, that would be different configuration with computer parts and/or other streaming solutons/products that are on the market?
When you work at this level of perfection, the first thing you find is that everything truly does matter. Nothing in a Taiko Extreme is there because it reduces cost, is a standard engineering solution or because its cosmetically appealing. A decent engineer could probably reduce the build cost of a Taiko by 50%, likely more, but at the same time they’d also reduce the sound quality by a very significant degree. There are several current owners of Taiko Extremes who formerly belonged to the DIY ‘lunatic fringe’.
This is interesting, so hardcore fanatics that used to build their own systems are jumping on the Taikowagon? This is a good sign, I would love to talk 2-3people that chose Taiko instead of their own builds.
These are guys who have tremendous depth of knowledge in IT engineering AND hi-fi, who have access to pretty much every commercial product required to build a state of the art server and are far from ‘fund limited‘ but despite several heroic efforts, they all ended up buying an Extreme because they simply could not reproduce the same level of obsessive care, knowledge, dedication and engineering that goes into an Extreme.
So what‘s in an Extreme that’s so special? Well actually everything. And what does ‘special‘ mean….well if you listed the parts in an Extreme, the chances are you‘d be unable to obtain the vast majority, being either ’built in house’ or built by third party specialist suppliers. Obviously there are some ’standard’ components but then you are typically talking about the finest components from highly specialized manufacturers .
So this is what I wanted to know, so are you saying that the parts that is in the Taiko, is NOT standard RAM, CPU etc.? Are the modfied? What is actually standard and what is not? That is what I want to know. If all Is standard then I still say that it´s overpriced, but if mods are being done of parts are custombuilt, then it´s another thing. That would mean that I cant get the parts myself.
So in my opinion, compared to other highly respected hi-fi components, is the Taiko Extreme worth its asking price? My background is in science and high tech manufacturing and I would answer, without hesitation definitely. But there’s more. Since people bought their Extreme there have been a string of developments in both hardware and software domains that have continued to refine sound quality, some were free and some productised, so what Taiko customers are listening to today is quite superior to what they actually bought, so the value of their purchase in terms of its most important deliverable, sound quality, has actually Increased.
Finally, you listed a couple of references, Roon Labs and Audio Sciences Forums. I am not a Roon user because their goals (commercial success) and mine (best sound quality) are not congruent.
What is mine? I have no experience from Roon, but I know what it is. I know HQplayer is very popular with its different oversampling possibilities.
Audio Sciences positions itself as a more scientific, measurements based website. Unfortunately the science is in name alone and nothing I read would pass even rudimentary scrutiny by scientific journals. Of the 3 articles I read, all contained uncontrolled for confounding variables that better explained the conclusions presented. For example, measuring the noise output from a DAC in order to compare its output with and without a network switch. The noise remain unchanged leading them to conclude that the switch had no effect, without controlling to see if the unaltered noise was actually coming from the DAC.
Could Halo May Audio be a great match for Taiko?
I would conclude by saying that compared to an Extreme, there are several somewhat lower cost alternatives known to provide excellent sound quality and offering various engineering ways of ‘skinning the cat’, but I would judge all to represent similar value for money, relative to each other and to other hi-fi components
Thanks for all your feedback.
Another thing; regarding the disks SSD; how easy is it to change them yourself? This must be a possibility, otherwise it´s a dealbreaker.