There are too many threads pertaining to Mike Lavigne’s system to know exactly where to post this, so I’ll post it here as the next installment called:
ONE AMIGO RETURNS TO SEATTLE TO HEAR MIKE LAVIGNE’S SYSTEM.
For those of you that might want to get caught up on some of Mike’s trials and tribulations, you may want to refer to these before further reading:
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...FC-(R)-outlets-this-morning&highlight=lavigne
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...ree-and-4-inches-the-final-1&highlight=amigos
The past few days found me in beautiful Seattle attending a scientific meeting, but I thought I might make even better use of my time by asking Mike if I could stop by for listen. For those of you who do not know Mike, he is not just an enthusiastic audiophile but an unbelievable host who welcomes the opportunity for serious audiophiles to listen to a system that he has masterfully assembled, and which he uses to great effect in the service of being a great ambassador for high end audio.
Before I get started I want to emphasize that the traveling audiophile road show (which, as near as I can tell, has provided Ked with enough frequent flyer miles in the past few years to earn free passage around the world) is one of the great privileges of our hobby by affording like-minded hobbyists the ability to learn and share both music, information (and even techno-babble) among us. OK, enough with the advertisement to encourage more of these trips among WBF readers. On to the adventure.
I have been fortunate to hear Mike’s system 3 times now. What impresses me the most is not the sound Mike manages to coax from his system, which is always superb, but the efforts he has made over the years constantly making incremental improvements that most of us mere mortals simply might never entertain because they are tedious and hard. I’d also suggest that most of us probably would not think that making time-consuming small changes frankly would be worth the effort. But not Mike.
I last visited Mike a bit over a year ago, and while his sound was enviable as usual, I actually may have had some nits to pick which I kept quietly and politely to myself. And in fact, Mike posted a few weeks after our visit, that he too had some nits that he thought could be easily addressed by moving his listening chair up about 4” Is it any wonder that I was looking forward to a re-visit? Not surprisingly, when I visited Mike’s familiar liar last night, it mostly looked the same. But Mike proceeded to point out a litany of small things (some not so small like his new DartZeel pre-amplifier) that included some changes in gear as well as room acoustics. Some of these changes looked deceptively simple, like replacing some fabric segments in his ceiling and wall, but if you know Mike, you can bet they were time consuming and done after careful trial and error evaluations.
I don’t really need not go into all of the changes he described (how much time do you have anyway?), but I will go into some detail about what I heard. To cut to the chase, the sound was simply exquisite and as far as I was concerned, the nits I thought I heard last time were gone. We played vinyl of course, but a fair amount of digital as well using the venerable Lampizator DSD DAC. We basically ran out of time which is why I didn't hear tape on this visit, but that was of little consequence. I know what tape offers and while it wasn't on the menu this time there's always a good reason now for a return visit! Besides, I was having a pretty damn good time listening to vinyl to even think about what I might have heard with tape. I think the phrase Mike used as it applied to the vinyl experience was both apt and poignant. He called the system a “space machine” and indeed it is. The view of the soundstage was a modestly forward one, say row F-H of a good hall, but left no uncertainty about image localization. Let’s put it this way, if the second violinist farted, you knew it was the second violinist and not the first violinist. Am I making my point?
More importantly, for all intent and purposes, musical enjoyment reached the heights of what I think home reproduction is capable of achieving in so many significant areas; (i.e. relatively flat frequency response, good dynamics (micro and micro), low distortion, timbral accuracy, imaging etc.). The net result was simply a very joyful experience listening to music. His system was truly impressive in the ability to suspend belief that what you are hearing was coming from a machine hooked up to a bunch of powered electronics. And isn’t that what it’s all about?
Mike isn’t particularly motivated to change anything because he says he has reached a state of satisfaction. I can certainly understand this since there is great truth in the adage “if it ain’t broken, don’t fix it”. But I wouldn’t be surprised if my next visit there was met with yet something new simply because Mike has been relentless in his pursuit of the finest home music reproduction possible and my sense is that this just isn’t going to change. You can call is crazy, or you can call it a genetic defect, or use any other modifier you wish. But not only do I understand it (it takes one to know one) but I respect it enormously.
It was not easy to know in advance what small token of appreciation I might bring to accompany my visit. Certainly not an LP as there are none that he would want that he doesn’t already have. A CD? C’mon folks, let’s get real. So I chose a little token* which is just my way of saying how much work- real time consuming and hard work- it takes to get to where he is with this hobby and why he is a most deserving recipient. From reading his contributions over the years it’s obvious that his tireless efforts are just something to be admired for what they have achieved, which is nothing more than a music reproduction system that first and foremost, makes him happy. That it also happens to be truly world class and in rarified company is a plus that I actually don’t think Mike cares about nearly as much. This is all the more reason I genuinely admire his impressive accomplishment.
Marty
* It was a small trophy that said "world's greatest audiophile". However in chatting with Mike by phone he is so darned modest that his preference was to keep it on his shelf, rather than make a pic public, where its intent might be misinterpreted. How can you refuse humility like that? So I took down the photo of the trophy.