What do you find so special about the sound, Peter?
Not Peter.
It has an authority and confidence unlike most reproductions.
What do you find so special about the sound, Peter?
Not Peter.
It has an authority and confidence unlike most reproductions.
Not Peter.
It has an authority and confidence unlike most reproductions.
That makes sense. There's much to the sound that I find problematic, but this is a good point.
This but also there is an ease, an effortlessness to the presentation. There is no strain, no spotlighting, no thinness. The balance seems right and my attention goes right to the music rather than to the system.
I would disagree about thinness. I hear some washed-out bleakness and thinness in the brass.
I don’t know if it's the recording (unfortunately, the original video poster did not provide enough information about it) or if it's how the video was recorded. But compare the brass to this, for example, much more color and saturation of sound on this one:
A recording of a live concert generally sounds much different from a phone recording of a stereo playing a recording, just as a live performance generally sounds very different from a stereo.
Do you have an actual system video to share that makes your point about thinness in the brass?
I like the sound of the WE system, but to me it shares the same phone video in a small room acoustic that all room vids suffer from to one degree or another. But it's really impressive-- and better than many we hear on the threads.A recording of a live concert generally sounds much different from a phone recording of a stereo playing a recording, just as a live performance generally sounds very different from a stereo.
Do you have an actual system video to share that makes your point about thinness in the brass?
So you agree about the difference in sound then, and that the WE horn sound (at least how the video is recorded) is problematic in the way I described.
I am just focusing on the issues with the sound I am hearing from the video as such, aside from whatever problems with and excuses about system videos there may be.
You claimed there was no thinness, I pointed out that there is. It's really that simple. No Ifs and Buts.
No, I don't agree with you. There are distinct differences in the recordings themselves. However, going back again to the video I posted I don't think those horns sound particularly thin...I think you are looking for nits to pick.So you agree about the difference in sound then, and that the WE horn sound (at least how the video is recorded) is problematic in the way I described.
I am just focusing on the issues with the sound I am hearing from the video as such, aside from whatever problems with and excuses about system videos there may be.
You claimed there was no thinness, I pointed out that there is. It's really that simple. No Ifs and Buts.
You would almost be certainly correct...it is a professional recording. Also, it has not gone through a studio processing with all that entails. It would be interesting to play the live YT recording (not compressed with YT algorithm) through that WE system and THEN see what is lacking. For sure it's not perfect, but as you noted, it is still really impressive for a system recording.I like the sound of the WE system, but to me it shares the same phone video in a small room acoustic that all room vids suffer from to one degree or another. But it's really impressive-- and better than many we hear on the threads.
The YT recording's not better because it's a live performance recording. I'm assuming the WE is probably also a recording of a live performance. The YT recording sounds more like a performance of live music and lacks some of the harshness and hifi signature I hear in the WE.
Maybe the YT recording is done with much better mics than our iPhones -- I'm guessing?
I like the sound of the WE system, but to me it shares the same phone video in a small room acoustic that all room vids suffer from to one degree or another. But it's really impressive-- and better than many we hear on the threads.
The YT recording's not better because it's a live performance recording. I'm assuming the WE is probably also a recording of a live performance. The YT recording sounds more like a performance of live music and lacks some of the harshness and hifi signature I hear in the WE.
Maybe the YT recording is done with much better mics than our iPhones -- I'm guessing?
No, I don't agree with you. There are distinct differences in the recordings themselves. However, going back again to the video I posted I don't think those horns sound particularly thin...I think you are looking for nits to pick.
Yes, that is clear from the video and while I there is nothing wrong to remind of the standard, it has to be clear that no stereo system lives 100% to that standard...Al is comparing the sound of a stereo system to the sound of real musicians playing in a live orchestra. It’s a very high standard, and I think the WE system does pretty well. Better in fact than the vast majority of other systems, IMO.
Al is comparing the sound of a stereo system to the sound of real musicians playing in a live orchestra. It’s a very high standard, and I think the WE system does pretty well. Better in fact than the vast majority of other systems, IMO.
The YT recording's not better because it's a live performance recording. I'm assuming the WE is probably also a recording of a live performance. The YT recording sounds more like a performance of live music and lacks some of the harshness and hifi signature I hear in the WE.
Excuses, excuses, excuses. That's what I hear from you and others here.
Fact is, you claimed there was no thinness, and there is on the brass in the WE video. I don't care what the reason is for that, but there is thinness, no doubt.
Does any modern speaker/amp combination sound like this?
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |