It appears to me that you like to have a battle and that doesn't interest me. The topic here is the OP and the article within. It is not related to me personally.
I'm sorry that you take it this way, Amir but it appears to me that your experience of vinyl is limited & hence your arguments are unduly limited & biased by that experience.
It is a good example of exactly what is being stated in this thread - it's all about implementation - good implementations in both vinyl & digital are what need to be compared to evaluate them.
You seem to be overly concerned with pops, clicks & groove noise as one reason why vinyl is inferior sounding & it now appears that your exposure to vinyl listening is limited to these lower quality implementations.
This is not a battle, Amir - it's the standard way I approach everyone's anecdotal listening experiences - finding out what their points of sonic reference are - as often this can be the most important aspect in evaluating the relevance of their impressions.
If you had stated that you had a good vinyl implementation beside a good digital implementation & you compared them side by side, then the value of your impressions would be greatly elevated, IMO
Last edited: