Wilson Alexx V vs Rockport Orion

depends on the music and SPL's. small rooms well set up can handle tip top gear with reduced large music expectations. small rooms can be SOTA with small music. but those small rooms get exposed the more you push them. horses for courses.

i had a small room with top gear and got top intimate sound, but it was limiting to try to get that level of performance with larger music.

sure, there are particular weird sounding small rooms.
Funny, I just read this after my reply. Great minds.. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Lavigne
It is not an exaggeration. Spend several hours watching an expert work. Listen/ hear for yourself. Some people don’t believe it because no matter how much they spend the “experts” probably aren’t experts. Yes it’s true that larger rooms are not as subject to low frequency issues so you can “ push the horses” but that’s only one aspect of it. Each and every millimeter counts. The goal is to remove the room asap from the equation. It starts with locking in one speaker. There is no set 25% this 38% that equilateral the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCAudiophile
Riddle me this ?
How come the M9 didn't make it to RH? Could it be something.... I dont know .......maybe.......political. Don't want to be a conspiracy theorist I leave that to Caesar but its ::::::::::::::::very interesting:::::::::::
Hi Elliot,
Not sure what conspiracy theories you are talking about. But I do agree with you that transparency in this industry would be nice. Lack of information makes people speculate, as you are doing... Specifically, why is "Worthless to the Audio Fans and Malignant to the Hobby " Harley holding on the Wilsons for so long? Did it have anything to do - directly or indirectly - with a recent executive at the Analytical Sound who was a real wilson fan boy. Trying to please the boss? Sign a contract with Wilson? .... would be good to know the truth...

Also, why hasn't Malignant Harley compared the wilsons compared them to the alsyvoxes, rockports, and whatever else he reviewed? (will get too nauseated to look up his reviews)
 
It is not an exaggeration. Spend several hours watching an expert work. Listen/ hear for yourself. Some people don’t believe it because no matter how much they spend the “experts” probably aren’t experts. Yes it’s true that larger rooms are not as subject to low frequency issues so you can “ push the horses” but that’s only one aspect of it. Each and every millimeter counts. The goal is to remove the room asap from the equation. It starts with locking in one speaker. There is no set 25% this 38% that equilateral the other.
Anyone who thinks they've removed their room is fooling themselves. You work within your room to launch the sound waves as constructively as possible while minimizing the negative ramifications.

Also, I've heard rooms before and after experts' efforts. Some were better, some worse, mostly different. If you have the patience you can do as good if not better because you have the advantage of time. And you can tweak as needed as you change equipment, especially speakers. All the information is out there (Get Better Sound, Sound Reproduction, videos, forums like this one, etc.). And if you are moderately technical, REW is free and is an invaluable tool to help guide you.

As always, Happy Listening!
 
Last edited:
Get better sound doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface. Of course you can’t remove the room but you can do as much as possible and live with the rest. All the information is not out there. I agree most efforts are so so. You’re basically saying a lot of people out there aren’t very good at it which actually makes my point. Measurements are necessary but insufficient . When you say “ different” that is an important point in the discussion. Because we both agree we can and do make things different in a meaningful way it’s impossible to fully account for this when reviewing or listening to different speakers under different conditions. The sound will be different but is it the speakers? That question was the basis of my original post.
 
First, it's all subjective. For example, what you might see as acceptable performance might very well be a much higher bar than what others do. I would argue that's the case for most of us at WBF.

Second, a room's performance capability IME is mostly limited / most challenging in the bass region. I'd argue most people have not heard what truly accurate bass sounds like so they don't know what they're missing, which gets back to #1. But at the end of the day, I'd wager for most folks that walk through audio shows, they don't know what they're missing and as such, they don't realize the magnitude of deleterious effects of poor rooms / poor room setup, so much is a wash from their perspective and as a result, the system matters most.

Final thought - over the years, I've experimented with my office system of the moment in my main 2 - channel well set up / room treated room and of course, the system sounds better in the larger treated room, but is it transformed to be better than it's price? No. In fact, the larger room requires high playback level (distortion) for the same SPL and bass impact is greatly diminished. There is no free lunch.

It’s not just the dimensions or materials in the room. It’s proper speaker placement and that affects highs, mids, and bass.
 
Anyone who thinks they've removed their room is fooling themselves. You work within your room to launch the sound waves as constructively as possible while minimizing the negative ramifications.

Also, I've heard rooms before and after experts' efforts. Some were better, some worse, mostly different. If you have the patience you can do as good if not better because you have the advantage of time. And you can tweak as needed as you change equipment, especially speakers. All the information is out there (Get Better Sound, Sound Reproduction, videos, forums like this one, etc.). And if you are moderately technical, REW is free and is an invaluable tool to help guide you.

As always, Happy Listening!

That’s not true. It takes setting up hundreds and even thousands of systems to have the knowledge that a Jim Smith or Stirling Trayle have. REW and a bit of time are no substitute for experience. And REW doesn’t measure musical engagement. There are subjective elements to optimal setup.
 
Riddle me this ?
How come the M9 didn't make it to RH? Could it be something.... I dont know .......maybe.......political. Don't want to be a conspiracy theorist I leave that to Caesar but its ::::::::::::::::very interesting:::::::::::
He already said "The Magico M9 is the best-sounding loudspeaker I’ve heard" :cool:

 
Scanspeak revelator series are the woofers
scan speak 26w/4878t00 10.5"
scan speak 32w/4878t00 12.5"

What’s the cost of these drivers?
 
What’s the cost of these drivers?
500 and-700 € per piece, the revelator series are really good drivers, but the evolution is unstoppable. Scan Speak is busy the new ellipticor series burn them in ashes after lisening for minute in comparison.
 
500 and-700 € per piece, the revelator series are really good drivers, but the evolution is unstoppable. Scan Speak is busy the new ellipticor series burn them in ashes after lisening for minute in comparison.
Ok, so quite low priced parts compared to horn drivers, as I imagined. So low priced parts, high margins, is what these guys are paying for.
 
Ok, so quite low priced parts compared to horn drivers, as I imagined. So low priced parts, high margins, is what these guys are paying for.
Let's put it this way, there are much more expensive drivers that aren't as good as Revelators.If you build it yourself you can use something better, but a company needs a reliable supply chain that can produce high quantities and consistent quality. Scanspeak can do that, and they sound very balanced because of the cone material (carbon reinforced paper)
 
Let's put it this way, there are much more expensive drivers that aren't as good as Revelators.If you build it yourself you can use something better, but a company needs a reliable supply chain that can produce high quantities and consistent quality. Scanspeak can do that, and they sound very balanced because of the cone material (carbon reinforced paper)

Yes there is always more expensive stuff that isn't as good. But a company can make its own drivers instead of sourcing lower priced ones just because they are easily available, and I doubt the people paying the retail (or retail discounted) cost are aware of the margins. And then there are vintage drivers which are higher cost, better quality, very low margin. Cessaro used TAD drivers and is now, after making money over time, trying to replace with their own drivers. Irrespective of what you think of their sound, you can't argue that Cessaro used expensive, high quality drivers.
 
Yes there is always more expensive stuff that isn't as good. But a company can make its own drivers instead of sourcing lower priced ones just because they are easily available, and I doubt the people paying the retail (or retail discounted) cost are aware of the margins. And then there are vintage drivers which are higher cost, better quality, very low margin. Cessaro used TAD drivers and is now, after making money over time, trying to replace with their own drivers. Irrespective of what you think of their sound, you can't argue that Cessaro used expensive, high quality drivers.
Yes, of course you can develop your own drivers, but 85% of all loudspeaker manufacturers get their drivers from here. They have been building drivers for e.g. Klangfilm, Telefunken, Scan Speak, Accuton, Magico, etc. for almost 100 years.

In-house development would caused the prices for loudspeakers to explode. No one can afford good loudspeakers if you can't build them themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marty
Yes, of course you can develop your own drivers, but 85% of all loudspeaker manufacturers get their drivers from here. They have been building drivers for e.g. Klangfilm, Telefunken, Scan Speak, Accuton, Magico, etc. for almost 100 years.
And the inflation in Scan speak prices compared to the inflation in the speakers it goes into?

In-house development has caused the prices for loudspeakers to explode.
Lol yes, I forgot that sourcing drivers externally has kept hifi prices low.
 
And the inflation in Scan speak prices compared to the inflation in the speakers it goes into?


Lol yes, I forgot that sourcing drivers externally has kept hifi prices low.
I think if the manufacturer only sold directly, without distribution chains, the prices would be even cheaper today. If they had to develop it themselves, they would need someone who could do it and a lot of machines. Nobody who wants to run a profitable company does that anymore. It is rare enthusiasts, usually with small quantities of products, who do something like that. Just look at what a good speaker cabinet costs these days. I think it costs more than the drivers, in my opinion.
 
I think if the manufacturer only sold directly, without distribution chains, the prices would be even cheaper today. If they had to develop it themselves, they would need someone who could do it and a lot of machines. Nobody who wants to run a profitable company does that anymore. It is rare enthusiasts, usually with small quantities of products, who do something like that. Just look at what a good speaker cabinet costs these days. I think it costs more than the drivers, in my opinion.

What a manufacturer should do is very different from what a consumer should do
 
I dont see your point if Cessaro is making transducers with TAD units its apparently OK
And if somebody else make LS with off the shelf units from scanspeak its suddenly overpriced and a rip off.

There is much more to LS design then the type of units that are used , its about the total execution of the design .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Audiohertz2
I dont see your point if Cessaro is making transducers with TAD units its apparently OK
And if somebody else make LS with off the shelf units from scanspeak it suddenly its overpriced and a rip off.

My point was the cost and quality of drivers being used among the ones commercially available. Both have high margins. hORNs use Radian beryllium. There are many other high quality, high priced drivers currently in use. Surely the enthusiastic audiophiles know them, those not interested should just go by retail price rather than do research.
 
I would give the Continuum Caliburn as an example of LDR not being accurate. As a $150K turntable, it is engineered well to remove noise and it makes for an exhilirating source that is super quiet and extracts everything out of the grooves. Is it incremental to a $50K TechDas Airforce 3PS? No. The AF3PS is an amazing table and I would be happy with that, but the Caliburn is a level above.

The danger of something like the Law of Diminishing Returns is that it “feels true” and many maybe don’t get an opportunity to hear the M9s or other expensive gear that counters the LDR myth.

I felt LDR was probably accurate until I got to hear some really nice systems. Now I think it’s a fugazi.

And if you still believe it to be true, what’s the level where diminishing returns kick in?

And shouldn’t there be a speaker that matches or almost matches the Magico M9? If so, what is it?
candidly, the bigger the system the bigger the problems is usually the result.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu