Looks like Mike is going the extra mile
We salute you
Mike, my journey cannot extend down the "actively isolate rack, then actively isolate each component" route
For me this would mean insanity and financial ruin LOL NOT!
No, my q is purely one based on the fact that these active platforms deal w conflicting tech in tower lab equipment like scanning microscopes w many moving parts and sensitive circuits
And one platform does the job
So, on this premise, surely one active platform under a single rack w multiple components stacked above, as long as tolerance limit for the whole shebang is not breached, should be just as effective as a single platform under each component on each tier of the rack
I can't for the life of me see how it wouldn't be as effective
And in terms of affordability, 4 active platforms (in my case, one to: tt, phono, phono psu, one to cdp, pre, pre psu, one to both monos, one to bpt) instead of 8 to isolate 8 components is a whole lot more approachable
We salute you
Mike, my journey cannot extend down the "actively isolate rack, then actively isolate each component" route
For me this would mean insanity and financial ruin LOL NOT!
No, my q is purely one based on the fact that these active platforms deal w conflicting tech in tower lab equipment like scanning microscopes w many moving parts and sensitive circuits
And one platform does the job
So, on this premise, surely one active platform under a single rack w multiple components stacked above, as long as tolerance limit for the whole shebang is not breached, should be just as effective as a single platform under each component on each tier of the rack
I can't for the life of me see how it wouldn't be as effective
And in terms of affordability, 4 active platforms (in my case, one to: tt, phono, phono psu, one to cdp, pre, pre psu, one to both monos, one to bpt) instead of 8 to isolate 8 components is a whole lot more approachable