So the inevitable questions from a big fan of deep house, who uses the system when the family watches a big action flick...That is actually pretty nice, they can be very close to the archway corners, even touch them, the 1.2 meter minimum only applies to the front wall, not the sidewall.
BTW:
A 15” woofer has a sfa of 1134cm2
A Botticelli woofer panel 4544cm2
A Carvaggio single 5376cm2
A Carvaggio full 10752cm2 (9.5 * a 15” woofer)
1. how propulsive is the Caravaggio single?
- For orchestral
- for deep house/synthesizer
- ...and for T-Rex?
2. Does the surface area of panels equate to the surface area of cones? I believe the dispersion of cones can be upwards of 2-3 inches...in the case of your panel is a significant 2cm (nearly 1 inch).
The reason that cones are often used (i believe as a non-techie) is the efficiency of their cubic volume to deliver massive punch. I remember well the Apogee Stages of old and how good a punch they had for Ray Charles...but I never got the chance to test them on deep house or movies which have electronic deep propulsive bass and compare them with cones.
I loook at the Gryphon Pendragon, the Genesis 1.2, the Martin Logan Statements...all big panels with tower subs using cones...and have to ask. Thanks for all your time in answering these questions patiently and so thoroughly!
Last edited: