Does Tonal Balance Affect Perceived Pace and Perceived Resolution?
- Thread starter Ron Resnick
- Start date
Thanks for posting this!
I was going to post something similar as I have lived with both types of room and it is the biggest factor effecting performance.
I think it helps to explain why many American audiophiles don't get PRAT and are obsessed with bass.
Last edited:
You are not alone.
I think most audiophiles don't know what it is and very few systems are able to portray it properly. It is something you have to be highly aware of and go after.
Obsession with frequency extension, imaging and detail is at odds with reproducing it.
I get your point. Good rhythm and timing are essential for a natural presentation and involvement. I also like good quality over quantity of bass. My father is American of English decent. My mother is from Saxony.
Because it is Really difficult to have both. You either go after one or the other.
The systems that I have heard that do PRAT have always been relatively simple - not massive and ambitious. The speakers have been single driver (full range) or two way with limited bass extension (maybe 35 to 50hz). I have heard the occasional 3 way system that did it, but it was a lot more work.
If you are after PRAT, imaging and detail are distractions. They are things that follow (the tail rather than the dog)
Frequency extension is very difficult to achieve because it adds complexity. At a minimum you need a 3 way, but probably 4+.
i think throwing stones at system aspirations as somehow exclusionary and negative is just wrong. it seems like it's more an excuse to ignore musical information that is on the recording. and rationalize system limitations.
like you are proud and happily elitist for limiting particular things. i want to hear all types of music at it's best. and hear all aspects of the music that is possible to hear.
it's more challenging to attain it all for sure and not lose important parts. and trade-offs do occur on the road to system optimization.
just my 2 cents.
Thank you.
Do you think the best, or perhaps the only, way to achieve PRaT is with high sensitivity speakers and SET amplifiers?
I believe it is concrete board.
(I covered my sidewalls with it underneath 1" of insulation before the insulation was covered with three-quarter inch walnut planks.)
Hardee backer is cement board, think of a piece f plywood made of cement with embedded mesh. We used it around a shower enclosure to apply subway tile. James Hardee also makes cement based siding which our house is clad in. This stuff lasts!
Don't get me wrong, I am not throwing stones or criticizing other peoples aspirations!
I am just explaining an observation. I have no problem with people enjoying whatever they like in whatever way they like.
I will not tell people what they should like or what they should listen to - hence my reluctance to participate in format war threads.
I lived in England for 16 years and became exposed to PRAT.
Living in Australia with housing construction similar to America I have found VERY difficult to get any of this. I have also found that my rooms chosen for audio reproduction are so leaky in the bass that it one is almost forced to add subwoofers.
It’s quite possible you got exposed to PRAT over 16 years. You are going to get some new exposure in 16 years, irrespective of where you live. It might have happened elsewhere too. For example, I got exposed to analog living in London. Can’t conclude the city caused it. It was just time for the next step
Hmmmm , Now who might that remind me of ?And some times sell them a pair of speakers !
Same tape, same performance, two recordings that sound different from one another. I probably misunderstood.
I think that high sensitivity is certainly helpful, and lower powered simpler amplifiers whether valve or solid state are often at the heart of systems with PRAT. I would not say that there is only one way to achieve it, or that there is a best way. I have heard many different combinations of equipment achieve it.
It was a combination of the places I lived (Cambridge and London) and the people I met. I would never had understood PRAT if someone hadn't hit me over the head with it.
thanks, sorry if i overreacted and appreciate you not doing that.
generalizations with a negative bend can seem to be more pointed than intended. no doubt some systems succeed at peripheral things, but miss the musical connection and not be engaging by degrees. it can happen. but one needs to hear it to know.
i don't subscribe to locations being evidence of any particular result with a particular system; but it's fair to recognize the plus's and minus's of styles of living.
i grew up in a home built in 1917 with heavy lath and plaster walls. but the rooms were quite small. never had any serious hifi there, but i am familiar with different type construction than more recent homes here. and that it "can" be an asset built in that newer homes might need to do some work to achieve. but that work can be done. old buildings do not have any singular right to good sound. even pictures rarely tell much of the story.
Similar threads
- Sticky
