I have a friend who is an audio file and he made his living as a technician. Around half of his work back in the day was replacing lasers in Sony transports.
Mark Levinson No:31 is a great transport but for me CEC TL0 and 47 Labs PiTracer are the best. I also listened Oracle and Rice Cd players. They’re good but just another CDM Pro2 transports, that’s all. Second best thing to CEC and 47 Labs are Philips CDM 1 or Industrial. Even CDM 4 is great to my ears. More importantly infamously unreliable Philips capacitors play a major role on the final sound of those transports. If you happen to find a Studer or Revox variant it even sounds better and more unreliable with German (Franco) capacitors. Studer A727 and A730 sound great, not as detailed as Esoteric but much more listenable.
I used to have Pioneer PD-91 and BOW ZZ-8 and they were great transports too.
BTW I never liked Esoteric top transports or Sony transports.
They use cheap laser from sanyo sfp 1 ~ 70$ if it sounds distorted, usually belts have to be changed.I have CEC TL0 3.0, it is far from all other transports. The difference is high
If you judge CD transports by their specification then you are in the road to the hell.They use cheap laser from sanyo sfp 1 ~ 70$ if it sounds distorted, usually belts have to be changed.
the digital signal does not look like a square wave but more like a shark fin that creates the analogue sound. similar signature to audiomedcca transport in the past
I judge by what I get for my money, not what magazines say.If you judge CD transports by their specification then you are in the road to the hell.
If you judge audio equipments by magazine reviews then you are in the road to the hell.
CEC is the best CD transport ever made. The bass is far from all other transports.
The Pace and timing is far better than other transports.
The dynamic and huge amount of information is far from other transports.
If you do not like it then it means your DAC and your system is wrong.
I listened to this player and also to the top level of complete burmester ($500k) audio system.I judge by what I get for my money, not what magazines say.
I'm more of a fan of the inventor of the belt drive system Udo Besser from Burmester. You get a higher quality of workmanship for your money. Direct, resistor and transformer coupled digital output with an almost perfect jitter-free signal. I adjust my sound with a DAC, the Burmester provides an excellent basis for high-quality digital sound.
This is a masterpiece in mechanical engineering and sound and worth every penny. My opion
View attachment 143294
Sounds like a setup problem or a disc problemI listened to this player and also to the top level of complete burmester ($500k) audio system.
The sound is dead .
I think so too.Sounds like a setup problem or a disc problem
No, I listened to Burmester many times.Sounds like a setup problem or a disc problem
that's your opinion, the 069 without question for me is the belt player on the market, 089 is might good as wellNo, I listened to Burmester many times.
If you compare CEC TL0 vs Burmester Transport in a reference system you will see the CEC is far from Burmester.
Your ears can tell you every thing about it.
There is no smart thinking in your description, just only negative marketing comment.I think so too.
The best statement from Stereophile magazine for the CEC transport was the external power supply. The transformer and the massive filtering of the voltage impressed us. Then there are only three fuses, a switch, a transformer and two sockets. They must have a special device and they completely forgot to measure the device.I know why
View attachment 143298
Marketing commentthat's your opinion, the 069 without question for me is the belt player on the market, 089 is might good as well
so my opinion is marketing and yours is fact, BS. I have heard the CEC, fine in its day, it is not better than the 069 IMO and many others agree. that's not marketing, that's listening to them and making a decisionMarketing comment
Isn't the TL 1x supposed to be better (for the money)?I have CEC TL0 3.0, it is far from all other transports. The difference is high
The square digital wave is not a spec but rather a forensic test. CEC is great, and like for the heavily flywheel driven by a weak motor via belt, so it sort of smooths out the rotation. The best transport mechanisms seem to have heavy rotors and weak motors, eg VRDS and CDM-1. CEC TL 1x seems to be best value play.If you judge CD transports by their specification then you are in the road to the hell.
If you judge audio equipments by magazine reviews then you are in the road to the hell.
CEC is the best CD transport ever made. The bass is far from all other transports.
The Pace and timing is far better than other transports.
The dynamic and huge amount of information is far from other transports.
If you do not like it then it means your DAC and your system is wrong.
Big fan of Kalista Ref Transport. It was the only one I seriously considered when I had only the Zanden DAC. Another buyer went further than I wanted to and got it. Then I came across a latest spec 4-box Zanden (transport and DAC) and traded in for it. Never looked back. And after 18 years, 12 of the owners I know who own one still own it. Even Audiocrack who had it for many many years has kept the Transport even as he has moved from Zanden DAC (and also DCS) to Wadax Ref.I had Burmester 969 transport and 970 dac and also CecTL 0 with Kondo DAC and Kalista
Also Kalista and Wadia S7I used like transport and Barclay Cabernet
The best for me was
1) Kalista
2) Burmester
3) Cec TL0
4) Wadia and Barclay
I just like TL0 3.0Isn't the TL 1x supposed to be better (for the money)?