Err the point was the glass and the marble floor not the fact that the same vendor made even more money by selling them silly priced cables and racks. Imho ymmv.
Looks like a Wilson marketing photo, where I never see speaker cables. Maybe they drill a hole in the floor? Speakers can look pretty great when you omit the realities that can impact the WAF.
Didn’t someone above say “then he un-gets them!”
Again, do a proper search before joking ... Besides WAMMs I think I see our member Bill Peugh in Phillipe Demarret enormous and fantastic sounding room, he will be able to tell us how it sounded.
Looks like a Wilson marketing photo, where I never see speaker cables. Maybe they drill a hole in the floor? Speakers can look pretty great when you omit the realities that can impact the WAF.
Didn’t someone above say “then he un-gets them!”
I am being mean now but I wouldn’t be surprised if this demographic asked whether they do a WiFi dongle version of the WAMM lol
It is okay. No need for more propaganda. Let’s let other members make their own minds up on the demographic.
Looks like a Wilson marketing photo, where I never see speaker cables. Maybe they drill a hole in the floor? Speakers can look pretty great when you omit the realities that can impact the WAF.
Didn’t someone above say “then he un-gets them!”
Yes, several drills in the floor, like one more WBF Wilson Audio owner I envy on this aspect
, as I hate seeing cables. Besides the cables were not Transparent Audio, other brands are also used by WAMM onwers.OK, I supply the data, you supply the jokes. A perfect pairing to let members making their own minds.
http://www.theaudiobeat.com/visits/ead_wamm_mc.htm
And i thought all french royalty had been be headed
Each to their own and I’ll bow out from the thread now. This is more what I see as a fully dedicated billionaire audiophile system.
View attachment 66258
Propaganda
View attachment 66258
OK, I supply the data, you supply the jokes. A perfect pairing to let members making their own minds.
Propaganda
Attachments
Look at that collection of telephoto lens collection on the right. Very cool.
OTOH if he/she/they actually used those lenses they would be scratched and have camo lens covers on them.
it's a trophy house with trophy toys. nothing wrong with that, just a different part of both hobbies than i participate in. i had a trophy car myself, loved looking at it, but sold it since i rarely used it.
But isn't the question we all want to know the answer to is...what cable is he using from this laptap to his preamp?
More like an advertising shot than an actual living space.
david
+100
Just eye bowling it, I would say that bonzo75 has more posts on this thread than anyone else.
None are empirical in nature, in fact, the only time he addresses the product specs, he mistook the midrange sensitivity to 120db (!!), which would have been a revelatory achievement for sure (I don’t think that is physically possible), still, he finds flaws in that imaginary miracle as well. It seems like the better speaker it is (empirically), the more hate it gets. Not a fun place for a Magico fan, for sure.
No. And they were to stop people commenting on sonics which were not empirical in nature.
Yup, Andrew Jones is the first person who came to mind when I read Jeffrey's post.
BUT note that he has experience designing uberspeakers for Pioneer's TAD division, and what he learned there (and perhaps previously at KEF) may well have "trickled down".
Is that Peter McGrath's head in the bottom left corner? He must be doing the setup. Might explain the laptop and cable. While probably not going to the the "best" sound, I'm sure McGrath will get the most out of the speakers considering the limitations.
Horse and course ..!
Loudspeakers are tools for engineers not for emotion like audiophiles . The recording engineer uses the tool that allows him to do his trade , nothing to do with perceived sound quality and emotion like when selecting your favorite speakers..
Similar threads
