Altough I do not consider myself as "opposition" - I say it is really what really happened. Most people keep their preferred tweaks (irrespective of price) . But yes, we also have different views on what are tweaks, we had a good thread on this subject.
Your answer including "energy management vs energy absorption" proves my point. A speech with plenty of ambiguity there, so that we can include or exclude anything.
Francisco, again this is not quite right. Isn’t the criticism about what I have done in my system with my tweaks and how I describe the effect? We’re not talking about most people and what they decide to do with most of their tweaks.
Energy absorption is pretty simple. I just removed the audio file room acoustic treatments in my room because it overdamped my room and sucked the life out of the system. The pneumatic isolation platforms did the same thing. The absorbed energy by over dampening the components.
Deciding what to keep and want to remove, managing the reflections versus the absorptions and how the speakers interact with the room boundaries, that is all about managing the energy.
David did not have to describe much to me. He used these simple terms and I understood right away what he meant. I do not see where the confusion or ambiguity comes from.
A short conversation, an email actually, taught me more than lots of posts, videos and books I have read on the subject. It did require a lot of listening and experimentation on my part to get it to where it is now, but that is likely simply because of my lack of experience.