Will it be easy to change between these “discovery” and “concert” modes? Does being in concert mode mean editing the order of the playlist (queue) is not possible?
Concert Mode means that you cannot change the order of the playback queue. You can, however, append tracks. Changing between the two modes will be as simple as flicking a switch in the XDMS app.Will it be easy to change between these “discovery” and “concert” modes? Does being in concert mode mean editing the order of the playlist (queue) is not possible?
Well not good news for me. After undergoing the operation of TAS! I was expecting a player with high sound quality and only one mode, not Serial Play , or Batch Play or Concert Play or Discovery Play.XDMS has two playback modes
Concert Mode which is truly Gapless, but you are restricted to playing the queue ( with a very large track limit) and not jumping around
Discovery Mode, where you can jump around as much as you like, but there are gaps
I understand your concern, but as Edward indicates, there shouldn't be a SQ difference between the two modes. Please note that there are no functionality limitations when using Concert Mode other than playback queue editing.Oh! that will be fine if both modes have the same sound quality, but I'm afraid it happens like with TAS that there is a noticeable difference between Serial and Batch. Gapless playback is naturally vital to me in a Player at this price point. What they are subliminally saying with two playback modes is that we choose between a player with the functions of any of those on the market or one with better sound, but it is not without pauses. After everything we've been told about XDMS, this wasn't what I expected.
As Christian explained.......Oh! that will be fine if both modes have the same sound quality, but I'm afraid it happens like with TAS that there is a noticeable difference between Serial and Batch. Gapless playback is naturally vital to me in a Player at this price point. What they are subliminally saying with two playback modes is that we choose between a player with the functions of any of those on the market or one with better sound, but it is not without pauses. After everything we've been told about XDMS, this wasn't what I expected.
Patience is a virtue. It will happenBut as Edward mentioned, a combined function is being worked on for release at a later time. For launch, we will have these two modes. Please bear with us, XDMS will start out great and it will only get better!
AFAIK XDMS will be released as version 2 as Wilson has rewritten the entire programI am exceedingly understanding what it takes to write a player, we did it back when I was with PortalPlayer (the startup I worked at in the early ’aughts). With a very skilled team its a huge effort, with a few less skilled folks it gets much worse. Then if you add some really diabolical test engineers hell-bent on breaking things (yours truly) the process takes even longer, but hopefully more bug free, stable, and reliable.
And as good as v1 may be, only after its been rolled out and bashed on by the installed base, and refined from there, will it evolve into a mature player. Recognizing this evolutionary nature of development, I hope folks are patient and understanding.
That said, seeing how team Taiko approaches things, I expect there will be a lot of sore jaws when XDMS is released. And a few dents in the floor!
Question to team Taiko… will you be localizing the app in the future?
Localizing: I'm not sure, but I suspect so. Maybe Edward can confirm.I am exceedingly understanding what it takes to write a player, we did it back when I was with PortalPlayer (the startup I worked at in the early ’aughts). With a very skilled team its a huge effort, with a few less skilled folks it gets much worse. Then if you add some really diabolical test engineers hell-bent on breaking things (yours truly) the process takes even longer, but hopefully more bug free, stable, and reliable.
And as good as v1 may be, only after its been rolled out and bashed on by the installed base, and refined from there, will it evolve into a mature player. Recognizing this evolutionary nature of development, I hope folks are patient and understanding.
That said, seeing how team Taiko approaches things, I expect there will be a lot of sore jaws when XDMS is released. And a few dents in the floor!
Question to team Taiko… will you be localizing the app in the future?
The "player" at this price point is free. The Extreme platform when introduced would play Roon but the customer had to purchase their own license, either independently or at the time of Extreme purchase.Oh! that will be fine if both modes have the same sound quality, but I'm afraid it happens like with TAS that there is a noticeable difference between Serial and Batch. Gapless playback is naturally vital to me in a Player at this price point. What they are subliminally saying with two playback modes is that we choose between a player with the functions of any of those on the market or one with better sound, but it is not without pauses. After everything we've been told about XDMS, this wasn't what I expected.
Post 10,106:Well, maybe I misunderstood the information that was passed on to us at WBT. I understood that we had to be patient with TAS since XDMS was not only going to have a better sound (and TAS is already very good), but it was going to end TAS's problems as a player. What I wanted to understand today is that if I want the best sound quality I will have to continue to endure the stops between movements of, for example, a concert, which is a PITA, but if the movement is also “attacca” it is a double PITA . But perhaps I have not understood it well and this is not so, I hope so.
Question to team Taiko… will you be localizing the app in the future?
Well, it has also been stated that there really shouldn't be a big difference between Serial Play and Batch Play in the current TAS and there is a difference in sound.Post 10,106:
Christaan offered that there are two modes with a sound quality difference between the two. Ed quickly set the record straight on that. Ed is the Project Manager for the XDMS player.
Steve Z
Well, it has also been stated that there really shouldn't be a big difference between Serial Play and Batch Play in the current TAS and there is a difference in sound.
As I am one of those who do not hear a sound quality difference between Direct and Batch Play, and you do I guess we'll just have to wait until XDMS is actually released and hear for ourselves. I prefer not to speculate and in the past Ed has always given out accurate information. But the proof will be in the listening.Well, it has also been stated that there really shouldn't be a big difference between Serial Play and Batch Play in the current TAS and there is a difference in sound.
Well, it has also been stated that there really shouldn't be a big difference between Serial Play and Batch Play in the current TAS and there is a difference in sound.
We do have another Extreme Owner / TAS user who detects a SQ difference between Serial Play and Gapless, and prefers Gapless. We have some theories about what might cause this, but as TAS is "end of life" we have not delved into this.
The Audio Player architecture of XDMS 2.0 is completely different from the Players which were coded for TAS. I would expect the SQ Delta between Concert and Discovery mode to be smaller and harder to detect, time will tell.
Rest assured we do have a exploration map to find and implement further improvements to Sound Quality of XDMS.
There will be no resting on Laurels
Thank you for pointing this out, I have edited the post accordinglyI think you mean Serial Play and Batch since there is no true gapless in TAS.