Puron vs Nordost QK1 cont'd... By coincidence, the local opera company is staging an excellent Rigoletto this weekend. The mid- or (so far) provincial level soprano playing Giselda has excellent technique, purity of tone and quite the range, hitting one high note after another dead on, up the scale. A real crowd pleaser. It's just that her voice doesn't leave me swooning or feeling for her, with no little to no warmth, unlike her main male counterparts. She brings back memories of the critique of Wynton Marsalis in the 1990's: great technique but lacking soul; all the notes expertly played but w/o reaching the feeling of the music (young acolytes of his took it even further -- technically proficient, boring as hell).
Why these thoughts here? At 302 hours now, the last 13 in the receptacle where it would be used -- see my previous post -- the effect of the Puron in my system is similar: great clarity, pace and deep, clean bass, the best I’ve heard here, but...well, the words that come to mind are dry and flat, if not occasionally a bit sour in pitch. Everything, and I mean everything, has a “cool” flavor or perspective (think Miles Davis), somewhat removed. Its sense of presence is gained from clarity and the transparency of detail not tone. Major keys often don't sound major, giving a sense of being just short of resolving. With Cécile McLorin Salvant's "The Sweetest Sounds" (The Window), there isn't a gram of sweetness. With that, the Puron's great clarity comes without a sense of delicacy (e.g., piano). The Nordost unit does unmistakably bring these latter qualities, but in absolute terms it's not about a comparison but engagement with the music itself (your listening tastes may well be different). Unless a transformation occurs in the next 50-100 hours, the Puron is not something I would want to live with, Nordost or not.