Not really , He is being defensive and combative because most comments are insinuating he’s a fool for buying an XVX , worse liking the WA sound..
Sad really ...!
Sad really ...!
Same with Rockport Arrakis...I remember reading Andy Payor also preferred the narrow baffle and also found the coupling in the bass with the room was different when the woofers are side firing.Less wide frontbaffle, compact stiff design
Plus i can move the woofer higher then with a front mount, point source
Plus it sounds great it couples to the room differently then with a low woofer front mount
Im not constrained by economics i can make what i want
The best example was the Audiophysic Virgo in a small room where the bass was boosted by the close walls down to 25hz it sounded divine. In large rooms the bass was barely noticeable. The distance from the wall is the magic with side-mounted bass drivers. A low bass coupling makes it impossible to locate it, your front driver midwoofer must go down low my opinion.Same with Rockport Arrakis...I remember reading Andy Payor also preferred the narrow baffle and also found the coupling in the bass with the room was different when the woofers are side firing.
Interesting...thanks!The best example was the Audiophysic Virgo in a small room where the bass was boosted by the close walls down to 25hz it sounded divine. In large rooms the bass was barely noticeable. The distance from the wall is the magic with side-mounted bass drivers. A low bass coupling makes it impossible to locate it, your front driver midwoofer must go down low my opinion.
Huh? I haven’t heard Asian speakers..do you have brands in mind?Does that make the Asian sound then small, unassuming with a lack of realistic dynamics? ;-)
Well I did not mean to imply either. I like the XVX and he bought what he liked most so good for him. My objection is his aggressive explicit comments that those who disagree with him are uninformed “novices”. The whole point of this forum is for people to share their subjective opinions about audio. Each of us seeks something slightly different so we make different choices based upon the design philosophy of the makers. Each choice will come with a set of compromises which we accept when we buy a speaker. It’s ok to point them out when explaining why we made a different choice. In fact that is the most nuanced appropriate way to explain your own choice. Stating childishly simplistic comments like “not in the same league “ and name calling are not thoughtful ways of doing so and gives no one here any basis for further learning.Not really , He is being defensive and combative because most comments are insinuating he’s a fool for buying an XVX , worse liking the WA sound..
Sad really ...!
I never heard a good sounding speaker with a side firing bass. Absolutely a wrong choice IMHO.Same with Rockport Arrakis...I remember reading Andy Payor also preferred the narrow baffle and also found the coupling in the bass with the room was different when the woofers are side firing.
I heard the XVX now many times .
XVX full range .... wonder why they put a sub in the room .
LYRA is more coherent / more revealing / better soundstage / better balanced /
Better cabinet
Simply lets you hear the music flow more naturally without faults / distractions.
Wilsons on VTL / ARC / CAT makes them much better imo , but not LYRA level
Yes, Wilson Audio is a brilliant company. That is a different point.I find it quite interesting that in this entire discussion I am the one of the few who recognizes that the XVX is not only the speaker of the decade but this half of the century, and Wilson is by far the most prestigious well thought off loudspeaker company of the last 30 years.
Having read this entire thread, I don’t see anyone attacking Wilson Audio or any of their products. The worst I’ve read might be my post that I just don’t like them but truly enjoy Rockport Technology speakers. But, I also said I have friends who love WA and more power to them. Don’t get defensive and enjoy listening to music you enjoy on the gear that makes your heart go “aah.”I find it quite interesting that in this entire discussion I am the one of the few who recognizes that the XVX is not only the speaker of the decade but this half of the century, and Wilson is by far the most prestigious well thought off loudspeaker company of the last 30 years. it's their flagship statement speaker. I believe that I meant that your posts were novice, not the persons. You are not novices. Jimi you are quite negative toward the XVX as is Elliott and most of the rest of you. It seems your are on a mission to condemn it. I would be extremely surprised if you found anything other than to condemn it by faint praise. Why waste your time since I already know how you feel. As far as my knowledge of the high end is concerned, somehow I have managed to wind up my 50 plus years of high end with an XVX/Thor MC2.1KW An, 1.25KW (2), MC3500 (2), MCD12000 An, and C-12000 An, exactly the gear I wanted and highly respect. This whole thread began with the novice assertion that the Lyra was "better" than an XVX as verified by anecdotal evidence. This is and remains a ridiculous assertion. A forum like WBF is well established and has well established members that know each other and gang up on new folks who totally disagree with them. They are surprised and offended when someone new stands their ground as I have. But I am afraid that you have chosen a losing position, by asserting that the Lyra is a "better" speaker than an XVX. It's just not, and no amount of trips to hear it, etc., can change this fact.
You all haven't addressed the Lyra's advanced age, its small size, the discontinuation of the Arrakis in favor of a much smaller speaker that is almost a decade old. You haven't addressed RH's opinion of it or MF's other than to brush them aside. You haven't addressed MC extensive review and numerous other extremely positive glowing reviews. And you have dismissed me and my opinion that it is hands down the finest loudspeaker that I have heard. So by all means go hear the XVX in the million plus dollar setup. It won't change your mind but just give you more ammunition to condemn it. You have chosen a weak horse to race in your assertion that the Lyra is a "better" speaker than an XVX.
I am weighing the option of buying a new speaker. The choices have narrowed down to Wilson Alexx V and Rockport Orion. Has anyone had the chance to compare the two?
Not ..... true lol .This whole thread began with the novice assertion that the Lyra was "better" than an XVX as verified by anecdotal evidence. This is and remains a ridiculous assertion
You are digging yourself into a deeper and evermore ludicrous and intellectually indefensible hole. You are highlighting more and more starkly your lack of understanding of the nature of this hobby.
I di d not say anything negative about the product or the company only that the posters reasons are all marketing , review clips and boiler plate . None of these reasons mean it is better than everything and some pinnacle of audio nirvana. You like it you buy it and hopefully you enjoy it period. I don't need to be convinced but it sounds like he does.I don't think Elliot is being negative on WA products , he was a WA dealer for years many moons back ..
I heard the XVX now many times .
XVX full range .... wonder why they put a sub in the room .
LYRA is more coherent / more revealing / better soundstage / better balanced /
Better cabinet
Simply lets you hear the music flow more naturally without faults / distractions.
Wilsons on VTL / ARC / CAT makes them much better imo , but not LYRA level