I can concur with having tried this ourselves under the Helix One!In fact, Helmut Thiele, who is using a special version of our Reactio for his own turntable "Thiele TT01", is doing exactly the way you suggest: one turntable directly on the rack, a second one on his active (Seismion) platform. For all his auditions at distributors and dealers, the audience was immediately aware of the huge improvement due to the isolation. We have also witnessed it once, and honestly: it exceeded all our expectations!
We also know of some people who tried our isolator under a Dohmann Helix One turntable. As you might know, this turntable uses the passive isolation system from MinusK. After placing our Reactio below, a further improvement was clearly achieved.
Marcus
i can tell you that is a very good match, had my NVS on active for 8 years. zero apparent self noise from the NVS (according to the Herzan read-out) so optimal boost from active. exceptional micro dynamics, focus and bass articulation. lack of smearing dynamic peaks. show conditions and noise levels are not the ideal place to hear everything this combo can do, but i'm sure it will do some fun stuff.Seismion will be accompanying The Audio Association at T.H.E. Show this upcoming weekend in Cosa Mesa in the Bristol 1 room. I believe it will be used under the Wave Kinetics NVS turntable at T.H.E. Show. @TheAudioAssociation @Seismion
I painstakingly (with help from my partner) compared all of my gears on and off Seismion. That comparison (A/B/A) included HRS, and CMS TT footers (and bunch of others). The difference was readily apparent (in favor of Seismion), also confirmed by partner - she has better ears than I do.I answered this on #201
Unfortunately that's not the correct way of evaluating it. The correct way is: component over Seismion and it's on vs component over the rack/platform or on the floor.
I'm happy for them. I hope they didn't just turn Seismion on and off when reaching the above conclusion.
I've had similar sonic benefits using Seismion tables under all of my components, but I have not gone to great lengths for comparison to other footers and passive devices (was using Herzan tables before). I'm curious: what LPS's are you using to power your Seismion's? That's my next step.I painstakingly (with help from my partner) compared all of my gears on and off Seismion. That comparison (A/B/A) included HRS, and CMS TT footers (and bunch of others). The difference was readily apparent (in favor of Seismion), also confirmed by partner - she has better ears than I do.
The dynamics, aliveness, resolution, jump factor, transparency with relaxation, undistorted realism, etc everything increased with Seismion without affecting tonality. passive devices I tried although good on their own way, were colored.
I don’t know if some electronics are tuned to be vibrated like some BBC/thin walled speakers are. But better isolation turn into better sound in my case. I’ve 4 Seismions in my system add the cumulative effect has been more than their sum. I plan to add more Seismion when budget allows. In all honesty, this has been one of the best audio investment I’ve made in recent years.
Btw, my floors are wood over concrete. Rack is from Core Audio Design. I use linear power supply with Cardas DC cables. All the thick cables connecting the gears resting on top of Seismion have vibration dampening cable elevators to reduce strain and minimize vibration transmission.
back when i first acquired my Tana/Herzan platforms, i did exactly this experiment under my darTZeel amplifiers; i asked a couple of local friends to come over and we went through the pain of trying the amps on and off my passive amp stands, and on the active devices. then we compared the active devices on the active shelf turned on and off. the active device turned off was better than the floor or my Box Furniture amp stands. but turned on was better than the others in a very special way.I painstakingly (with help from my partner) compared all of my gears on and off Seismion. That comparison (A/B/A) included HRS, and CMS TT footers (and bunch of others). The difference was readily apparent (in favor of Seismion), also confirmed by partner - she has better ears than I do.
The dynamics, aliveness, resolution, jump factor, transparency with relaxation, undistorted realism, etc everything increased with Seismion without affecting tonality. passive devices I tried although good on their own way, were colored.
I don’t know if some electronics are tuned to be vibrated like some BBC/thin walled speakers are. But better isolation turn into better sound in my case. I’ve 4 Seismions in my system add the cumulative effect has been more than their sum. I plan to add more Seismion when budget allows. In all honesty, this has been one of the best audio investment I’ve made in recent years.
Btw, my floors are wood over concrete. Rack is from Core Audio Design. I use linear power supply with Cardas DC cables. All the thick cables connecting the gears resting on top of Seismion have vibration dampening cable elevators to reduce strain and minimize vibration transmission.
Sure you mean the Reactio plus and not the initial Reactio? Sebastian said, isolation performance of the plus and the 2.0 is the same.twice the isolation capability of the PLUS (543 and 653 models)
The isolation performance is too complex to be described by just one value. In fact, it is at least a frequency dependent parameter, as you can see in below figure.Sure you mean the Reactio plus and not the initial Reactio? Sebastian said, isolation performance of the plus and the 2.0 is the same.
Fully agree with David's report, I was in his room last weekend when he demonstrated the changes he mentioned. The tension in the suspension springs can affect the sound which is audible. User can adjust it to his preference. It is quite time consuming but very valuable to advanced user.Sharing my experience with Reactio Plus under Esoteric Grandioso T1. In a nutshell - needs patience to fine-tune setup to get the most out of the Reactio Plus, but worth the time and effort.
First setup following the instructions had the springy suspension set to about 1.5mm from the lowest level (instructions tell you to have at least 1.5mm movement up/down). I A/B/A tested a number of records and genres (see pictures) to get a better understanding of how the Reactio Plus affected dynamics, soundstage, musicality, etc
With the first setup, the Reactio Plus had a positive impact on soundstage, bass and separation. For example:
Cantate Domino - track A1
However, I felt there was a reduction in fast transients - making some pieces sound less musical. For example:
- Organ deeper more oomph
- Trumpet more expanded
- more separation, richer voices (hear around the edges)
Last Emperor - track B1
- Less attack and seemingly slower pace / dynamics during the first 30 seconds
Second setup - I adjusted the platform such that there was now 1.5mm movement from the highest level, making the suspension stiffer. I hoped that this would yield better dynamics (like driving a sports car with stiffer suspension to get a more responsive ride).
With this setup, each track improved in musicality with faster transients. But perhaps also some reduction in the other positive attributes from setup 1.
So what to do? I called Sebastian (Seismion) to share my experience and to get a better understanding of what was happening. Sebastian explained that there is a 5mm movement between upper / lower level, and setting the level with 2.5mm up/down movement should be optimal.
So third setup (2.5mm up/down movement) ...
Voila - improvements all round.
In summary, the Reactio Plus does a good job as an isolation platform even when switched off. It is an improvement over just placing my T1 on the top shelf of the FE rack. With it switched on, the major improvements are wider / deeper soundstage, deeper bass, better instrument separation and positioning, vocals more present, and more "you are there-3D" sound. Especially good if you listen to a lot of large scale orchestral music.
Other callouts:
- Different tomearm/cartridges behave slightly differently. FR66s/DaVa Soul and Tosca/ATMC2022 benefit more from the platform switched on, whilst Analog Technik DST15 Ice Age had marginal benefits
- Changing the stock feet on the Reactio Plus to Revopods further improved the sound for me
- For fine-tuning performance, place the platform with TT/component on some short (2 inches sufficient) blocks to make it easier to adjust level. Measure the height of the platform at the lowest and highest levels using callipers, and adjust to 2.5mm up/down movement. Once done, remove the blocks and position correctly
(Sigh.) Well, thanks for instilling more audiophilia nervosa on this. I had set a Reactio Plus under my Esoteric T1 in April and considered myself set, with some excellent results, but now I see that I have to fiddle with things to tune them into the sweet spot. Being lazy, I did simply mic the play I have under the table as I set it up, and it's 2.7mm, as chance would have it. I do recall spending the time to get it centered in the range for the Seismion table during my one set up session. I'm leaving it at that, especially since it's in pretty good agreement with what you report, and that I'm really digging my table now that I got a proper cartridge match onto my Safir 9 two weeks ago (Air Tight Opus 1 - - damned good cartridge!).Sharing my experience with Reactio Plus under Esoteric Grandioso T1. In a nutshell - needs patience to fine-tune setup to get the most out of the Reactio Plus, but worth the time and effort.
First setup following the instructions had the springy suspension set to about 1.5mm from the lowest level (instructions tell you to have at least 1.5mm movement up/down). I A/B/A tested a number of records and genres (see pictures) to get a better understanding of how the Reactio Plus affected dynamics, soundstage, musicality, etc
With the first setup, the Reactio Plus had a positive impact on soundstage, bass and separation. For example:
Cantate Domino - track A1
However, I felt there was a reduction in fast transients - making some pieces sound less musical. For example:
- Organ deeper more oomph
- Trumpet more expanded
- more separation, richer voices (hear around the edges)
Last Emperor - track B1
- Less attack and seemingly slower pace / dynamics during the first 30 seconds
Second setup - I adjusted the platform such that there was now 1.5mm movement from the highest level, making the suspension stiffer. I hoped that this would yield better dynamics (like driving a sports car with stiffer suspension to get a more responsive ride).
With this setup, each track improved in musicality with faster transients. But perhaps also some reduction in the other positive attributes from setup 1.
So what to do? I called Sebastian (Seismion) to share my experience and to get a better understanding of what was happening. Sebastian explained that there is a 5mm movement between upper / lower level, and setting the level with 2.5mm up/down movement should be optimal.
So third setup (2.5mm up/down movement) ...
Voila - improvements all round.
In summary, the Reactio Plus does a good job as an isolation platform even when switched off. It is an improvement over just placing my T1 on the top shelf of the FE rack. With it switched on, the major improvements are wider / deeper soundstage, deeper bass, better instrument separation and positioning, vocals more present, and more "you are there-3D" sound. Especially good if you listen to a lot of large scale orchestral music.
Other callouts:
- Different tomearm/cartridges behave slightly differently. FR66s/DaVa Soul and Tosca/ATMC2022 benefit more from the platform switched on, whilst Analog Technik DST15 Ice Age had marginal benefits
- Changing the stock feet on the Reactio Plus to Revopods further improved the sound for me
- For fine-tuning performance, place the platform with TT/component on some short (2 inches sufficient) blocks to make it easier to adjust level. Measure the height of the platform at the lowest and highest levels using callipers, and adjust to 2.5mm up/down movement. Once done, remove the blocks and position correctly
I did and this was my final preference.Interesting that you’ve placed the Seismion above the Daiza. I have my Daiza on top of the Seismion. Did you try it this way?
Sounds like you tried the Seismion with its supplied power supply and with some LPSU's. Can you please comment on what you heard with this change? I'm a multiple Seismion owner that is "LPSU curious". Thanks!UK Seismion Reactio Plus owner here!
In June, my dealer, Studio AV, Chobham, Surrey, asked me if I wanted to have a Seismion Reactio Plus 543 on extended home loan, together with an Aurender N30 SA (I have owned an N20 since January 2023).
My interest was instantly piqued, placing a high priority on vibration control as one of the key foundations of my audio system.
Over the following few weeks, I put the Seismion active isolation platform through it’s paces, with the supplied 12v 8.5amp power supply, as well as a couple of 12v LPSU’s that I use in my system (PliXir Elite BDC and Coherent QP2).
My Aurender N20 was supported by a trio of Quiescent Apex 50 Couplers, on a Taiko Audio Daizo passive platform, on the top grid level of one of my two Stillpoints ESS racks, used to accommodate my multi-box system.
The Seismion active platform was inserted into the system, as an additional level between Daiza and Apex Couplers and initially The Seismion was supported by it’s own footers, although I did experiment with Stillpoints (Ultra SS and Ultra 5’s) as well as Taiko’s own panzerholz footers as the interface with the Daiza platform.
I eventually settled on Taiko’s own footers, which seemed to me to offer the right balance in this vibration-combatting array!
I was so impressed with the added performance provided by the Seismion Reactio Plus, that I purchased it from my dealer, who is now awaiting the Seismion Reactio 2.0, which I am eager to audition under my D’Agostino Momentum S250 MxV power amp.
Although, due to limited availability in the UK, I have not auditioned many competing products, I am confident enough to proclaim the Seismion platform as a major enhancement to the enjoyment I get from my system.
Before anyone asks, no, I haven’t yet tried it under my turntable (digital is my primary source), but I anticipate that a further Seismion purchase will result, when I have tried a second platform under the power amp!
View attachment 135654
Me too!Sounds like you tried the Seismion with its supplied power supply and with some LPSU's. Can you please comment on what you heard with this change? I'm a multiple Seismion owner that is "LPSU curious". Thanks!