This being a business, I don't want to impose my own views of future of disc playback and hence this thread. I am trying to find out if there is a class of people who at least in the next 12 months, would be buying a high-end transport instead of their current one being the last, and next being a server.
All my SACDs are gathering dust. I'm re-building some of that collection from high-rez downloads.
Music servers are still too tweaky to operate for most people
and in multichannel!Guess you'll have to find someone to rip all of those SACDs.....
That's what I used to say years ago. Then some smart kid in Germany wrote EAC and gave it away free - exactaudiocopy.de - and it mattered far, far less. Now, with dBPowerAmp which is even better than EAC, I rip on any old thing I can find. If it reports accurate with the AccurateRip database, it is bit perfect.
Will repeat that I think Squeezebox and Sonos too make music server setup pretty easy. Most of the process is automated.
Being a business, you may have no choice but to show the ML so as not to alienate any potential customers who are expecting to see a high-end piece. If someone brought in a SACD and all you had was a cheap DVD player to demo it off, you instantly lose credibility.
It is a circular question. I am trying to see if any of you would come to our shop looking for a transport .
It costs us dollars to inventory showroom gear. Right now, we only have cheap DVD players as transports and the CD slot in our touchscreen PC. Question is if we should show the Mark Levinson No 512 SACD/CD player.
The reviews are good. And the sound I heard is also very good. The only reason I see value for it personally is SACD as mentioned.
Even if you had a copy of my disc on your server (or offered to load it) I would still be a bit skeptical. I know that music servers can sound great, but I also know that the devil is in the details of server, application, DAC, cables, ripping method, etc. For me it's way too many variables to take into consideration in the context of an audition.
I understand your point, but also consider that for many audiophiles these variables are part of a "game" that is fun to play. There's many audio aficionados that are very into cables (sometimes more than into music...), choosing a DAC is like choosing a CD player, and even the annoying part of CD upload is, in the end, re-paid by the overall comfort of having everything reachable by a single finger touch!
I guess that explains the marketing logic behind the Lexicon universal player.What I was getting at is what if I stopped into Amir's store to audition the Revel Salons. He's got them setup with some nice Levinson amplifiers and preamp and when I present the stack of my reference discs that I brought in with me I'm presented with a "cheap DVD transport" on which to play them. Regardless of any realities of the situation my perception is going to be that the playback chain is flawed and that will likely have an effect on my own mental evaluation of the Salons.
Later on I head into a competing dealer and evaluate Wilson Sophia 3s connected to a full ARC system. In that case I likely won't have the same perception issue and ultimately may give what I hear at the competing dealer more credence.... which may ultimately result in Amir losing a sale (no matter how good they sounded).
I am in agreement with what others have said:
So #2 still rules
- The CD/SACD transport is dead - the bridge between a transport and a DAC has now been optimized
- CD/SACD players will continue to exist until the music server is as easy to use
- Music servers are still too tweaky to operate for most people, even something like the Mach2Music:
- If building your own, good luck, and you need a good soundcard and software - configuration hell
- If your DAC doesn't have a USB input, you need a bridge
- Not all bridges were created equal; we are back to the old days of evaluating transports and DACs and the quality of the interface between them
- You need a monitor or an iP*d
- You need to get an app for the iP*d
- You need to charge the iP*d
- If your iP*d is in use by others in the household, you can't do much
- Placing a monitor on our racks is a pain for some of us
- You may need to set up wireless for your server to get artwork
- Integrated servers like Sooloos solve some of these problems, but too expensive and too small in capacity
(...)
Later on I head into a competing dealer and evaluate Wilson Sophia 3s connected to a full ARC system. In that case I likely won't have the same perception issue and ultimately may give what I hear at the competing dealer more credence.... which may ultimately result in Amir losing a sale (no matter how good they sounded).
IMHO your point is much more important you think that you are stating. System synergy between components is a key point in audiophile systems. I own an all ARC system with a high power VTL amplifier. Recently I borrowed an ARC Ref 110 amplifier - much less power than my big VTLs, but the system gained a coherency and musical drive that the mixed system can not approach.
I have no experience with current ML gear, but my bet is that a ML CD/SACD player should be the optimal complement for an all ML system, unless you are thinking about a much more expensive piece.